Republicans went against their own rules and held a special election in August to stop abortion; they lost.
Republicans then lost in November and abortion rights were enshrined in Ohio's constitution.
Now Republicans are saying no to democracy and laws.
Our problem here is all the Republicans.
They're anti-American. Ship them off to a place that fits them better.
See also the "We're a republic, not a democracy" talking point that swelled a year or two ago (and was even repeated by a senator). It's patently stupid to anyone who knows the meaning of those words, but it was also testing the water for overt anti-democracy rhetoric.
If all the conservatives consented to moving to the same new location uninhabitabed before yet the land provided all the basic needs, how would it work out?
Could not agree more. These dumbasses just cannot grasp the rules in their little club are for them, not for me. Their rules don't apply to me. Any extra-secular claims are completely invalid in our government.
From the party that brought us great hits such as: Don’t Tread on Me, and Small Government! comes their new hit singles: Tread on You and Threateningly Massive Government!
They might be disappointed with some of King Charles' opinions, especially when it comes to the environment. But, you know, God given right and all that!
That's pretty much the only connotation the rest of the world thinks about that word. Until political news from Washington happens because of US-defaultism.
As a non- American, I straight up don't understand how political representatives are not required to action the collective will of the people who elected them. It should be against the law, or subject to legal penalty in some way.
.
I say we make all the gods battle like Pokemon and whichever wins gets bred until they produce a sub-par sequel Universe that lets us collect and battle new gods! It will eventually become a multi-universe franchise but can only be played on the Super Cosmocom - unless you guys prefer collectible card games?
What they say their "god" says does not matter in a secular government. They can go fuck themselves. Whenever anyone talks about their god, in my head, I give it about as much relevance as if they were talking about what Harry Potter demands. Or
Also, I'd like it if more people were to ask these radical right wing religious extremists which god they are talking about. All too often, we give this provincialism - that talking about "God" must mean we have to assume they are talking about Jehovah/Yahweh/Allah - a pass. Make them spell it out.
Hey, don't get the Muslims involved. Their god sanctions abortions (under specific circumstances, though over the years these have mostly evolved to: mother in danger, rape, child will be severely handicapped or the old, we don't have the effing money for one more mouth to feed and may God forgive us and we won't talk to anybody about it).
That's why it baffled me to see Canadian Muslims support their Christian counterparts to ban abortions.
At this point, I have to say that they've never even read their books.
Same with Judaism. The fetus isn't considered alive until it emerges from the woman. Until that point, it's considered potential life and not as important as the woman's actual life. In fact, the fetus is considered part of the woman the same way as her hip bone is part of her body.
In Judaism, getting an abortion isn't considered murder like some Christians think it is. Then again, those Christians don't care what other religions (or people who aren't religious) think. They want their religious views to be the law of the land.
My comment was not about Muslims, it was aimed at xtians and the way the term "God" is provincially just meant to mean theirs. Interestingly enough, they have the same god as Muslims, since they are both Abrahamic religions. Allah = Jehovah.
The last kind of government that claims to have a "God-given right" was a monarchy. Am I out of the loop and have missed the coronation of the King of Ohio?
Some conservatives actually like the idea of a monarchy. It's the ultimate manifestation of 'rich people are rich because they're inherently better', which is all conservatism really is about.
You know what the smart political thing to do here is? Shut up and go along with it. It was an off year and voters chose it in a landslide. Keep quiet, and they'll probably consider the issue settled by 2024.
Instead, they're going to make this an issue persisting into 2024 that drives massive turnout against them. They feel power slipping, so they tighten their hold, but that only makes it slip faster.
We need to start referring to it as it is. Pro-birth or Anti-woman. Continuing to use their name for it is giving them validation for an invalid stance.
That's funny because I believe that it's my god given right to have one. Checkmate religious extremists! Need me to quote a Bible verse on it? Gimme a bit, I'm sure I can misinterpret one somewhere just like you guys do all the time.
"Ordeal of the bitter water" is what you're looking for, from the Book of Numbers I think. But good luck, extremists are happy to ignore scripture that doesn't fit their narrative.
I believe I have the god given right to give access to abortion to everyone. Source? God said so, I believe it, and most importantly, I've given you the exact same arguments as you gave me.
“The Ohio legislature alone will consider what, if any, modifications to make to existing laws based on public hearings and input from legal experts on both sides.”
The strategy Republicans are now proposing would essentially strip Ohio’s courts of the authority to repeal existing abortion restrictions before the new amendment goes into effect on December 7.
“No amendment can overturn the God-given rights with which we were born,” state Rep. Beth Lear (R-Galena) added in the Republican’s statement.
Another representative, Jennifer Gross (R-West Chester), claimed the referendum had only passed due to “foreign election interference.”
Rep. Bill Dean (R-Xenia) said the amendment “doesn’t repeal a single Ohio law,” and that its language is “dangerously vague and unconstrained, and can be weaponized to attack parental rights or defend rapists, pedophiles, and human traffickers.”
Gretchen Whitmer, told The Detroit News that “it shouldn’t be lost on people that these right-wing organizations and radical Republicans in the Michigan Legislature are cherry-picking courts to try to once again overturn a constitutionally guaranteed right because they can’t win with voters.”
The original article contains 387 words, the summary contains 175 words. Saved 55%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
I can't wait until Jennifer Gross has to watch her husband fuck another woman to beget children. Disgusting pick-me traitor to her gender is going to keep fucking around until she finds out that no, these men don't think she's special and no, she hasn't earned an equal place among them by giving away her own rights. There's a special place in the hell she believes in waiting for her one day.
God doesn't give out rights or authority in a secular republic, the people do. When you use the authority delegated by the people to take away some of those people's rights and tell them God gives you that right, it's called bullshitting.
That's always the weakness of a democracy/republic; it's when charlatans convince people to consent to give up their power that they fail into autocracies
Sure, you're born with them, but only if you're born to the right parents, in the right place on a map, at the right time. They're not holy writ, not natural law- they are an expression of a social contract, whereby you get them by upholding and respecting them in others.
That not everybody has the same rights should be a bright signal that they aren't God-given, they're granted by people, and if they're not actively upheld and protected, they're just nice words somewhere that will mean nothing when someone violates them
The reason I'm going to the effort to argue that our rights arise in the social contract is not to pretend they don't exist, it is rather to point out that unless people participate in protecting and upholding them, they can be taken away. My concern with the 'they are God-given' crowd is that they seem to want people to be passive about rights, and that's how they can be taken away.
Rights don't really exist in a meaningful way outside of like humans agreeing on them. They're not like mass that you can measure. If everyone decided "Blue eyed people don't have the right to own property" well then that's the world. Compare with if everyone said "Gravity on earth accelerates at 5 m/s^2"
Rights are agreements. They are aspirational. But they don't just automatically exist in any meaningful way.
Honestly, after two defeats I was a little worried that turnout for Nov 2024 would decrease since protection is now in their state constitution. It's really kind of these folks to keep their losing issue relevant for us.
Person for person, Ohio is pretty evenly split between Republicans and Democrats, but since it's gerrymandered beyond all recognition, Republicans have an sizeable advantage when it comes to electing representatives.