If Thanos had, instead of randomly wiping out 50% of all living things, he had instead in each species wiped out only the dumbest 50% what would the reaction of each avenger have been?

He talked about how he thought that supposedly objective IQ tests were generally a series of gates designed by people already considered intelligent to keep themselves in power, and that they totally disregarded huge swaths of indispensable human knowledge and talent.

Modern psychology supports this, too. IQ tests are bullshit, and intelligence is not something that can be reasonably quantified in any meaningful sense without an insane amount of asterisks.

Also...are we counting kids? Because you'd probably find kids are consistently beneath the 50% line on any generic intelligence measuring criteria someone makes up.

I love the entire story, then your very solid and succinct answer

The dumbest 50% is everyone but me.

Ahhhh the GOAT. Seriously, as a smart kid everything else about me was ignored. Something wrong at school? You CAN do it, so just do it. D&D breaks up mental stats, but there's even more out there. Int, Wis, Cha to start. Then there's motivation, happiness, and empathy, and more. The mind is super complex and an int score of 18 being all that matters is like the saying "this hammer solves my nail problem, it will surely solve my window problem."

Lol dude is asking for scientific way to define "dumbness" in a world with infinity stones and flying people

Love the tag.

and good Asimov story thanks

So Thanos could eat them more easily?

I really appreciate Asimov’s thoughts. Ethical hat off for a second - I would suggest removing the most destructive 50%. If someone is truly stupid they might just as well be harmless. However, removing the swathe of the population that engage in violence, greed, etc. would be a far better use of the finger snap than some metric of stupidity.

Even with the classic definition of intelligence it's just useless - not predictive or indicative of anything.

A student without the skills to learn isn't going to learn much regardless of whether they're intelligent.

The definition for intelligence changed over the last 2 centuries because we keep discovering how an animal can fit the definition, and intelligence was used to separate humans from animals. Now it's even worse because people are trying to separate AI from humans.

I like the concept laid out by Delany: in a novel he describe 3 levels of intelligence based on the understanding of various point of views, but it's not a ranking.

The first stage is simplex: people don't understand the science of the world, so everything is kind of magical but this concept of magic make the world hold itself and they can grasp everything and use everything with this conception of magic.

Second stage is complex: people have an understanding of science and they can explain many things, but not everything. And when they can't explain something, they can't cope with it, because they don't have the conceptual tools for it. Thus they will either deny this thing existence of plug it into their existing concepts by ignoring the feature that can't fit.

Third and last stage is multiplex : people can accept that there are theories different than the ones they know, ideas also. Point of views can shape the way you see the world, and even the scientific theories you have to explain the world can be seen as a point of view on the world, so changing this point of view can bring a new or different understanding of a phenomenon or thing or person. These points of view all coexist at the same time, none of them is more true than the other. Like the concept of magic, this allows to grasp, use or accept even the ununderstandable and the unknown, but with a better ability to understand than the simplex stage.

I like this model. But it's more a model for open-mindedness than intelligence. But maybe that's the thing.

Good questions from Asimov. But just like with car repair, he didn’t know this subject. It has been a field of study for a while, and researchers have worked directly on this core problem defining general intelligence distinct from specific knowledge.

This Veritassium video is a balanced overview of the topic: https://youtu.be/FkKPsLxgpuY?si=iY7QBEQK1DkzNhxI

Needless to say, no, the IQ test is not a conspiracy by people who are good at number sequence problems to keep themselves in charge of the world.

And that's why Thanos should have made everybody half as large as they once were.

Holy cow. However intelligence is defined, you're smarter than I am. That would have been a really short film.

...and I'm just realizing that universe would look pretty much exactly like those little kid Marvel Adventures shows...

Do you happen to know where Asimov published this opinion and what its title was?

sorry to stop the circlejerk, but this is dumb. an intelligent person could learn to repair the car more easily and have more insight than a moron. intelligence exists and we all experience it everyday. the wais-r is a relatively good test, but no there is never going to be a perfect way to measure intelligence. you can say intelligence is just what the test measures which is really pretty non biased, but that's reducing things too much. y'all know morons and people that are crazy fucking smart. experience in different subjects is distributed, but the ability to gain experience quickly is the biggest difference.

rip grandma

cougheugenicscough

I'd bet good money that most republicans are smarter than AOC

I mean, the average newborn is smarter than the average politician, so maybe it's not as bad as we think.

I'm frankly astonished anyone could genuinely think the Avengers would ever somehow be more ok with letting Thanos kill "only the stupid people". Like...that's a very strange read on these characters to think they'd ever react any differently in this scenario.

But even if they were so morally and ethically bankrupt to think it may not be such a bad idea, the truth is killing "the dumber 50%" is still causing catastrophic secondary effects. People would lose loved ones. That's enough of a reason to go Avenging.

Hell, how are we defining "dumb"? Because you may have just murdered every child under a certain age.

You think none of the Avengers is in the "dumb" 50%?

Deep cut

And given that they'd be at full strength they'd probably find a way to stop him and reverse things faster than they did in OTL

Good point. But I dunno. Thor is a big power loss, and unless Captain America gets a free pass for emotional intelligence counting, they're short in leadership, too.

You see the Avengers are super big into eugenics. It's in the subtext mate

This message was brought to you by the Rabbits in Australia

He was called mad because he wanted to return earth to it's 1970 population

I think he should have cut the pregnancy rate to a third of what it is now. No one would notice. No one would die or be missed. There'd just be a lot less people within fifty years.

I think he should have made everyone half size. Then they would have only needed half as many resources plus there's a little tiny, angry Spiderman jumping around.

That wouldn't have impressed death. He is into goth girls.

Actually a good point. He should have just done that.

Yeah, Dan Brown dealt with it in a much better manner.

Thor, Starlord, Drax, and Mantis would all be toast. Steve, Bucky, and Falcon are tossups because I think their intelligence is supposed to be about average.

Not necessarily any Avengers would be gone.

Yup. His movie motivation was dumbed down. The whole resources thing is stupid for exactly this reason.

In the comics, Thanos became infatuated with the Marvel Universe incarnation of Death. ...And naturally he figured that if he killed half the universe at once, he'd get her attention. (cause girls love it when a boy makes a huge amount of work for them...)

Anyway, his plan was still moronic, but "manchild does stupid thing to impress girl" is a classic for a reason.

It wasn't just humans, it was the whole universe. He wasn't concerned with how each individual species' populations would fluctuate, he just had a solution in his head and went with it.

Ya know, the "mad Titan" thing.

There is an addendum to his plan that might have made it make sense. If he had said something like "I'm giving the universe the chance to make better decisions", suddenly having half as many people means (probably a little more than) half resource consumption, half the carbon emission, and more time to figure out and implement solutions to these problems. I'm not sure how the housing crisis would pan out, I expect it would get worse. It also makes more sense that he destroys the stones after "I gave the universe its chance, now the ball is in its court".

This also solves the doubling resource problem. His motives are to pressure people to change their ways. Giving them more stuff might cut hunger, but you'll just have that hunger again in 50 years and we'd probably increase carbon output to boot, and destroy more environment to get these doubled resources.

I don't know enough about the stones to say whether "infinite resources" or whatever cheat code would have worked, but they certainly could have dropped a line that it wasn't possible, or that it would cause more problems than it solved (how does chemistry even work in this universe? If nothing ever gets used in reactions then the chemistry that makes our bodies work is borked)

But anyway, as the Russos did not put this line in, the premise was flawed

His method was stupid

He would be part of the dumbest 50%.

I think that the motive should be allowed to be dumb, and their mistake was making Thanos appear lucid and competent. They really should have leaned into "the mad titan" thing and made him act more like an unhinged despot.

But then you don't get to massacre people

Too slow

Has to be more than that. People can have multiple children and probably would have more just because they can. It'd need to be cut to at least one third or less.

Non-zero chance that the distribution of infertility does not match the distributions of male to female. Could result in complete population collapse pretty quickly.

Sorry that's not exciting enough.

Yep. That's actually what at least one version of Reed Richards does with the gauntlet.

Hulk is not dumb, he just was born 30 years later than Banner.

We know that given the time Hulk also proves to Bea genius of his own.

Isn't the hulk a scientist?

He could have literally just wished for the best, most ethical solution to happen without even coming up with one and had the stones figure it out for him (i mean, one of the infinitely powerful magical space crystals is the mind stone after all, could totally just say it's capable of thought)

I agree that Thanos is dumb, but he's well written. He's supposed to be stupidly short sighted; that's his whole deal. He experienced a problem with his own society, and invented an idiotic solution that was readily rejected (rightly) by his own people. He saw the downfall after that and said to himself that the cause was that they didn't listen to him.

When he grew powerful enough to do it, wanting nobody else to suffer the loss of their entire society like he did, forces the universe to participate in his little exercise with little to no regard for the losses people suffer, nor the long term consequences of his plan.

He has no ability to think beyond the small scope of time that encompasses his plan.

Sure, resources will be far less scarce for people in the short term, but, as you've correctly pointed out, in the long term, he's simply delaying the inevitable, which is why his statement near the end of endgame is so poignant: "I am inevitable". Then he snaps, and nothing happens because Tony stole the infinity stones, proving he's not inevitable and underneath it all, he's not thinking of the inevitable outcome of his plan (which is only delaying things at best, and is an actual war crime).

He's convinced himself so throughly that his way is the only way that he refuses to even entertain the idea that there may be other solutions, which bluntly, other solutions may have an actual effect in the long run (more than 100 years out).

He's meant to be fanatical about it being the only option and unable to be convinced otherwise. He's written perfectly for that role.

Other means of population control should be considered, but he'll have none of it. I see it as analogous to so many humans in real life that deny long term damages to the planet and to future generations because of short sighted "freedoms" or benefits that they may reap in their lifetime. A whole "fuck the distant future for immediate gains" kind of mentality; something that, quite bluntly, is the prevailing mindset of most capitalist businesses. It's all about maximizing the present and damn the consequences.

Thanos is a literary tool to describe problems we have right here and right now, on a fundamental level. People do convinced that their way is the only way that they will do immense harm to their fellow humans (and/or other living beings) just to do what they think is in the best interest of themselves and others, without considering evidence or any discourse that may prove that their way may not work out long term.

That's because they tried to make him some sort of noble villain in the movies when he was just horny for Death in the comics and wanted to impress her

I can't think of an Avenger or even sidekick who I would put in the bottom 50% of the earth's population. Even the dumbest are probably in the top 10-15%.

Edit: I didn't really think of GotG as "Avengers", but yeah, Drax and Mantis are probably gone, unless they're somehow smart for their species. Or unless emotional intelligence is enough to save Mantis. I don't know if we ever find out enough about Groot to know, but I'd assume he's in the top of his species. I still think everyone else survives (Hulk survives via Banner, or at least Banner survives).

@[email protected]

Banner is still around, but Hulk is gone.

Maybe Thor, too.

Quinn definitely is gone. So is Drax and many characters from GOTG.

There are plenty of dumb avengers, though a lot of them have not been featured in the movies yet.

It wouldn't shock me if Hawkeye disappeared. But then again who'd notice?

Keep in mind that people are part of the eco being terrorismed

See this is why I hate when people are like "just watch this 20 minute long video!" The video just restates what you said in one sentence that took me 5 seconds to read. It states it over and over again, slowly, interspersed with reading long quotes, slowly, for 20+ minutes.

Entertaining how to react to fictional atrocities is useful in shaping our real-world responses to actual atrocities.

Pls touch grass