Yeah, it's definitely a good idea to make absolutely sure they have your confirmed identity, just to watch some YouTube videos.
Some people actually care about privacy.
Unfortunately Google requires a phone number, which is linked to my person verified by documents. So it's not really private or anonymous. If you run a normal Android Google knows who you are anyway.
Maybe it's a regional thing, they wanted some way to verify that I was really 18+.
And Google requires a phone number if you want to create a new account, but I did make a couple more before this was a thing.
I gave them my documents with everything except the age blocked out with a black bar. I then digitally altered the birthdate to not be my real one. It worked.
You can, if you pass cookies from your browser to the command line. The easiest way is to specify your browser, e.g. yt-dlp --cookies-from-browser firefox
I try to use YT as little as possible these days. Used to stream a lot of indie music, not talking indie radio guitarists no I mean the REAL indie basement dwellers, but since YT took away play-all buttons I moved to SoundCloud. Just type in a song you know in the genre you want and let it autoplay.
Well the first roadbump you'll run into is that I've never heard of grooveshark. Power to you, those on the Fediverse who persevere will benefit immensely during these early adoption years.
I think greyjay is the best YouTube app. I gave up on Newpipe the moment Firefox for Android reenabled extension support. I didn't like the fact that Newpipe needed a fork just for Sponsor block support.
Well, with newpipes forks are possible in order to implement controversial features, with Grayjay they are unlikely because of its non-open-source license.
I’ve had the same problem, in my case it was that my adblocker was blocking the domains used to track video position, which are mildly tracking-ish in nature.
I don't like having a google account that has google tracking any video I watch. Also... the recommendations are more addicting and with Tubular (NewPipe fork) and Freetube I just imported my subs and follow them a bit. Never had to deal with the shitty youtube website once. Also, ReVanced still uses the proprietary YouTube apk and I prefer free software on my phone
Never got revanced to work on my phone (in spite of reading all the documentation and online advice, doing literally everything that was supposed to make it work short of jail breaking or changing to Graphene) and as for ublock, I use it but I prefer YouTube on a dedicated client to a browser tab since I usually have far too many of the latter open at a time..
Besides, unlike revanced, NewPipe worked perfectly out of the box and it seems like PipePipe still does, so..
have you tried revanced manager? i typically just download revanced manager, pop over to apkmirror and get the recommended version (in this case 19.43.41), downloading the v8 package, going back into revanced manager and clicking storage, selecting the apk, and then letting it run. if you select the custom branding patch you don't have to uninstall the original youtube.
I mean, newpipe is just download install and it works.
Anyone have a tutorial?
(Also how would Revanced bypass age restricted if you need to sign in before youtube even sends the video over to you? Does Revanced use burner accounts like Aurora store?)
I like revanced but it is still the closed source YouTube client and I still don't know what it is doing. Plus you have to connect a Google account for some actions (like history).
OP is a screenshot from newpipe, they are very rigid on adding those things, that's why you need to download other forks to get sponsorblock for example.
It's been a while since I used chrome, but I used to use incognito to avoid that from happening. You can log into your services in the incognito session and when you're done and close the incognito session, the temporary folder with your session stuff will get deleted, leaving the normal chrome browser unaffected.
I had this happen recently with Freetube and the, very strangely, age restricted new trailer for a Darktide update. Hope the big brains figure out a work around. Even invidious fallback wouldn’t play it.
To wit: PipePipe is the only one that works for me now to get past the "log in to confirm you're not a bot" viewing any video. Recent PP releases allow you to log into your YT account (which will also solve this age problem), my ISP uses CGNAT and my IP is shared by millions and changes frequently triggering the YT bot filter for every video. :-/
In this case it was an updated version (even though I specifically searched for the original, but that's a seperate issue) of Michael Jackson's They Don't Care About Us video with some graphic images of war and starvation.
I think it's like this with all age-gated videos, though 😮💨
My most mildly infuriating thing with freetube is that the new player is not aligned with the edges of the video, I reported it initially cause I thought it was a bug
I'm surprised more people don't create fake accounts with fake identities?
Be Goliath Giantman who lives in tinytown, Nebraska. Use the address of a Dominos.
Then Go one step farther. Make a social media profile. Post AI photos of Goliath's family and dog. Assign him the job you wish you had. Sign him up for ancestry .com and create the family tree you want.
I wonder how much effort would be needed for going further?
Create the AI family pictures. You'll need a bunch of different ones. Profile pics, some bar picks. Throw a wedding in there. And some completely random situations.
Can you make a person, and them propt it to always use the same result for different pictures?
Make a resume. You'll want different jobs in the past probably. Maybe they moved around.
They're a legal restriction after all, not a random corporate decision.
That's not true. If it was, the videos would only be age gated in places where it's required by law. That's not the case here in Denmark, to name just one example.
It's 100% corporate "err on the side of censorship" bullshit.
Are you offering a cheaper way or more payout? Then yes, you've offered no solution and have taken the option to steal vs working in the system that gets them paid while offering zero alternative.
Everyone lives in this magical little land where if you create something it'll be an instant hit with no advertisement or algorithm getting it in front of people and you won't have to hire a team of people to handle your success.
Yes, the problem are definitely the few percent of people using ad blockers, but absolutely not the corpos spewing out a few cents while watching creators fight against each other and the algorithm ™️ from their second yacht they bought this week.
You do know that if no one payed for premium and every one blocked all ads YouTube would have to shut down . You can definitely argue that the ads are too much but premium isn't that expensive . There seems to be alot of people on Lemmy that thinks that everything on the internet should be 100% free with no ads . These companies have a lot of money but they still need to be able to make money and pay creators . Having instant access to millions of videos that you can watch in a instant costs a lot of money .
Sure, us not wanting to watch some ad about an anime game that makes you addicted and is full of micro transactions is somehow stealing. Are you out of your mind?
For that matter why is it my business to pay for profit content creators? I do what I please and it is up to them to figure it out. The only creators calling third party clients theft are the ones making millions
Hang on, isn't the idea of theft a legal one (especially "theft" of this type), and don't all governments recommend an ad blocker for safe browsing? So now, do you break governmental decree or corporate decree?
Wait a moment, UK digital misuse act: "Unauthorised Acts with intent to impair, or with recklessness as to impairing the operation of a computer", notice that "recklessness" clause? Would serving ads that encourage PuP or straight up malware downloads be reckless? Damn right it would. Does blocking adblock fall under this - oh my yes ("don't follow established safety regulations" is grounds for recklessness).
Sorry to say this, but the "it's theft to skip ads" argument makes about as much sense as Epstein killing himself (he didn't).
Sync, but for the same of argument, edge is better than Firefox. When Firefox stops sucking I'll use it. Until then it's a third choice browser. Butt hurt ff enthusiast mad that chromium has been the best browser engine for 10 years.
Give me a way to pay them with my money, without financing the 3rd yacht of a middle man. But I don't look at stupid ads. You call it stealing? I don't fucking care, I'll do it anyway. Sue me :)
People would, in general, really love to pay a reasonable subscription to youtube that gets fairly distributed to the video creators they watch the most.
So if there's ever a way to do that, they'll probably use it.