Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)ME
mechoman444 @lemmy.world

I am live.

Posts 0
Comments 563
Those of you who don't vote, why?
  • I don't like either candidate. I don't believe either one is better than the other so I have no stake either way.

    Also the electoral college I don't trust my representative will vote the way I want.

    Also this country has been bought and paid for a long time ago. Most political affiliations are garnered by lobbyists employed by massive bureaucratic corporations.

    Just look at the supreme Court.

    You want change? Revolution is the only way. The tree of liberty should be fertilized by the blood of Patriots and tyrants from time to time.

  • If everyone is fired by AI, who's going to buy the products and services made by the companies if no one has money anymore?
  • The meaning of the term "Artificial General Intelligence" (AGI) has indeed evolved in recent years. Initially, AGI was conceptualized as a form of intelligence that could understand, learn, and apply knowledge across a wide range of tasks, much like a human. This notion dates back to the mid-20th century, rooted in foundational neural network algorithms and deliberative reasoning hypotheses from the 1950s and 1960s

    https://www.justthink.ai/artificial-general-intelligence/history-and-evolution-of-agi-tracing-its-development-from-theoretical-concept-to-current-state

    https://luceit.com/blog/artificial-intelligence/evolution-of-artificial-intelligence-ai-generative-ai-and-agi/

    In recent times, the definition and understanding of AGI have been influenced by advancements in specialized AI technologies. Modern discussions often revolve around the practicalities and challenges of achieving AGI, with a focus on the limitations of current AI systems, which excel in narrow tasks but struggle with generalizing across different domains. For example, while models like GPT-3 have shown some cross-contextual learning abilities, they still lack the comprehensive reasoning, emotional intelligence, and transparency required for true AGI

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_general_intelligence

    https://www.justthink.ai/artificial-general-intelligence/history-and-evolution-of-agi-tracing-its-development-from-theoretical-concept-to-current-state

    AI always meant human level intelligence.

    What you fail to understand is with recent understanding of such concepts AI will far, far surpass human level everything.

    (The above statement was generated by GPT4 sources have been provided. This response was prompted by the poster of this response.)

  • If everyone is fired by AI, who's going to buy the products and services made by the companies if no one has money anymore?
  • An llm will never be able to do this. Unfortunately the word AI has been hijacked by companies and marketeers. Ai now means just about anything really.

    They're actually coming up with new words to describe what AI used to mean such as AGI, which stands for artificial general intelligence.

    To elaborate on the premise of this post, The boost that we're going to get from an actual artificial intelligence one that is perhaps sentient will be so much that the tasks that were once performed Will become so mundane and menial that it will not make any difference who performs those tasks or if they're even being paid to do so.

    In the same sense that the printing press removed the necessity for scribes, at least for the majority. Or the firearm displaced the bow and arrow as the dominant weapon.

    Eventually, what general artificial intelligence will give us is a world free of our Faith-Based monetary system currently dominating the world.

    In essence, we shouldn't need money after general artificial intelligence is implemented.

  • What to know about Louisiana's new surgical castration law
  • The aspects to this issue are... Interesting. On one hand sex offenders are considered the lowest the low so who cares how they're treated on the other hand it's cruel and unusual on every level.

    Then, if they do consent to the surgery the state and tax payers don't have to pay to imprison one of these sex offenders but so many human and civil rights, regardless of the crimes committed are being violated and what's worse the supreme Court of this country is downright unless some you can't count on them striking down this down right abysmal in Draconian law.

    Although Hammurabi would be proud.