On one hand, absolutely. You're not a bad person because you enjoyed a Roman Polanski film. OTOH, if you keep religiously watching The Cosby Show, you might be giving off signals to others you probably don't want to.
We have all sinned, every one of us. Even if we didn't realize it at the time, we see our actions years later and are disgusted with ourselves.
The time for purity tests are over, it's time to admit that deep down the human experience is being a giant piece of shit, but it is also trying to cleanse yourself of such burdensome humanity and grow into something far kinder, far smarter, far more empathetic, far more patient, and above all, far more wonderful than a human being.
it’s time to admit that deep down the human experience is being a giant piece of shit
Well, I'm tempted to say "speak for yourself there, buddy". I'd agree if you said that a lot of people are like that, but you seem to imply that goes for basically everyone?
Look everyone, he without sin!
I mean there's sinned, and there's raped and trafficked people. So it really depends on what the person did and on if you want to support that or not. I don't think refusing to watch works from pedophiles or abusers is a bad thing. I refuse to watch Polanski for what he did, I don't care if his latest movie is good, I won't watch it. But I can watch Guillermo del Toro movies and not feel guilty, despite the fact that he signed a petition to pardon Polanski, but what I can do is not put people in Hollywood on a pedestal so high that it hurts me when I have to remove them from it.
Otherkin rights!!!
I think there's a difference between enjoying the media of a problematic person vs continuing to financially support said person and give their media continued relevance, thereby continuing to give them a platform with which to spew bigotry and hate.
(This comment is about she who shall not be named)
So you're saying that just to be safe we need to pirate everything? Got it.
Anything with Tom Cruise in it gets pirated. No money for Scientology.
I think we'd be hard pressed to find media to enjoy if we needed to make sure we agree on everything with the author...
#however
that cunt is a special case because, it's not just a case of an author having shit views in their personal life or voting a certain way quietly.
she's an activist, whose sole purpose in life has become making life worse for a certain group of people. incredibly vile and full of hate, and very vocal about it. using her platform consistently in the worst possible way.
also she's a bad writer.
she's an activist, whose sole purpose in life has become making life worse for a certain group of people. incredibly vile and full of hate, and very vocal about it. using her platform consistently in the worst possible way.
She's exactly what you'd expect from a 2nd wave radfem. It's why so many of her ideological peers are also 2nd wave radfems. I'd bet if asked she'd tell you about how big an influence someone like Mary Daly was on her views on sex and feminism - Mary Daly was a 2nd wave radfem who likened trans people to Frankenstein's monster and whose teaching career ended because of Title IX complaints related to her refusing to teach male students.
also she's a bad writer.
She's decent at storytelling but painfully awful at world building and thinking through how existing threads from previous stories might interact with the one she wants to tell this time. Her weaknesses wouldn't shine through as much if she were writing individual, disconnected stories instead of multi-part series in a shared universe.
I think we'd be hard pressed to find media to enjoy if we needed to make sure we agree on everything with the author...
You should look up Bloodywood.
In July of the same year, Bloodywood partnered with online counselling site HopeTherapy and released the song "Jee Veerey", dedicated to fighting depression and mental illness.[14][15] On 15 January 2019, the band released "Endurant", a song dealing with the topic of bullying.[4]
Along with the messages included in their songs, the band aims to support various social/charity causes. With the release of the video for their song "Jee Veerey", they gave away pre-paid online counselling sessions.
Upon returning to India from their 2019 European tour, Bloodywood donated the earnings to Posh Foundation, a local NGO that cares for homeless animals, for the purchase of a new ambulance.[22]
I think we’d be hard pressed to find media to enjoy if we needed to make sure we agree on everything with the author…
Just wanted to add that I don't even agree on everything with MYSELF.
Don't give more money to the millionaire mold-brain witch, pirate her shit 🏴☠️
She already have the fame, my enjoyment of her work by pirating will literally do nothing to her.
Oh no! Time to retroactively pretend the thing I liked was always bad.
Oh boy, time to point out the show that was made by a creeper had warning signs all along, but was shutdown when I previously criticized the show.
BTW, the people who wrote Transformers 4 should be investigated.
Right? Like you can still enjoy their shit but not them personally. You can be a talented shit waffle
Yeah, that's completely true. It's up to each person to decide what their standards are and where they draw the line. Like Roman Polanski anally raping a 13 year old and using his money and fame to leave the country and avoid the prison time may be across one person's line while another person says, "Eh, what can you do? It was almost 50 years ago." Also true, but that piece of shit is still alive and making money--from people who like his work at least enough to keep consuming it.
or arguably more annoying - time to pretend me not liking that person's work was always justified!
as if people weren't allowed to dislike things unless it was somehow morally justified
I think Kevin Spacey may be one of the best (most skilled) actors of his generation, and among the best across several generations. A true peer of Dustin Hoffman.
I was shocked by the allegations, and crushed when it became evident (to me) that it wasn't a smear campaign.
In a way it's crazy that I can be so emotionally engaged with someone I've never met, likely never will, and who has no idea I exist. OTOH, it's not surprising when people we respect, or even idolize, turn out to be not only merely human, but morally flawed in particularly inexcusable ways.
I still feel sad and betrayed by Spacey, and it'll forever taint my ability to enjoy his incredible performances.
If you had paid any attention to gossip in the 2000s, you'd have heard about Spacey being a creep. It was an open secret.
Yeah, I didn't, and don't, pay attention to celebrity gossip. In retrospect, when it was first news and it was being covered everywhere, yeah, it seems that it was pretty well known in industry.
I just watch the movies; I don't care about the actor's personal lives.
A lot of us avoid celebrity gossip, because 99% of it is utter drivel.
"Goddammit, he was so good at playing a creep! Why did he have to turn out to be a real creep?"
Yeah, that's how I felt about Jonathan Majors as Kang. "He's great! Got this fun, wild, sensitive vibe, but there's this dark and menacing core lurking beneath." uhuh.
Yeah man, that one hurt for sure...
I was curious about a furry I used to listen to in high school (Two the Griffin) and looked him up the other day to see what happened to him only to discover he became a Nazi pedophile and is why I had not heard of him for so long.
And since he was the furry equivalent of Maddox, I now question if Maddox is/was also a racist pedophile...
2 the Ranting Gryphon? Shit, they fell down hard it seems.
The copium in some of these comments... Keep giving your money to terrible people so they feel rewarded for their acts and can continue to abuse others. I'm sure that will work out for the best.
That's why I pirate all media I engage in. That way I never support horrible people.
I’d make a Woody Allen joke but it just feels too soon… yi.
Just...too soon, and too close to home, you know? 😉
I see what you did there
I think the only actor I absolutely can't stand because of RL actions is Mark Wahlberg.
Dude committed multiple hate crime assaults before he was famous. Then he tried to brush them off as water under the bridge when they surfaced, without even giving reparations to the guy he partially blinded.
And then he repeatedly plays the "misunderstood heart of gold tough guy" in all his movies.
Just can't look past it.
No, say it ain't so, not fawking Marky Mark!!
Feel it, feel it.
Every good person is actually a bad person trying to atone for something horrible they did.
Not sure this is true ... But mainly due to nuance.
I think everyone who has reached adulthood has done bad things worthy of atonement (not because minors can't be bad, just to set a line), regardless of whether that's because they're a bad person or because they made poor decisions. I think of myself as a good person - because I try to better the lives of those around me - but I can think of plenty of bad things I've done (primarily out of ignorance or foolishness - I don't think I've ever acted with the intent of hurting someone).
I'm not trying to atone for those things; once I realized they were bad things, I did my best to fix them and once I did everything I could, I moved on (and hoped the other participants did as well). In some cases, continuing to try to atone for bad acts would have exacerbated the consequences if the other party just wanted to move on.
My mom, who was a big fan of aphorisms, used to say "if you mess up, apologize if you should, fix it if you can, and move on." I try to live by this.
So, to reiterate the nuance: I try to fix bad things I've done if I can; I try to learn from them so I don't do them again; but I don't live my life trying to atone for them.
I do like the sentiment behind your post, in case you think us philosophically opposed.
Fuck me, who told you my secret?
My personal rule, in broadest terms is that if I cancel someone, they are released upon death.
What warrants cancelling is pretty wishy washy, and I'm sure I'm hypocritical at times. But generally speaking, if the person is dead, I feel free to enjoy their body of work.
If the person is ruined, or in jail, it's a grey area.
And if the person is continuing to work, with little to no repercussions. They're banned.
Depending on the media and its importance to me, at a minimum I just ensure the problematic creator is financially dead to me.
Often the media will be ruined by the reveal of the creators nature, I'll see subtext in it I didn't see before. So that fixes itself.
But if I enjoy the media, I'll continue to enjoy the media privately, in my own mind, from my own hard drive, in my own art. I'll keep online engagement to a minimum (don't want the creator getting any benefits from analytic trends) and I'll make sure the creator doesn't directly see a cent from me.
Basically, if I gave them money before I "cancelled" them, I'm going to get that money back in a round about way, they don't deserve it 🏴☠️
People always say, "only the good die young." But that made me think. What if long-lived people are just more likely to do bad stuff over the course of their lives? Because everyone does good and bad stuff.
IMHO whether or not a person will ever be a domestic abuser or rapist is pretty much determined by the time they reach adulthood. It's not like a good man suddenly decides to start beating his wife or raping teenagers.
That you know of. That seems like a pretty broad brush to be painting with. It may be generally true but I'd be extremely surprised if there were no exceptions.
The only counter I have to that is how sensitive our brains are to chemical, mental, and physical trauma.
Drugs, injury, and environmental stress cause easily observable behavior changes, but also changes on the brain measurable in medical imaging. And there's a lot of acknowledgement that these changes can occur in childhood and persist.
I don't think anyone chooses to be cruel, I think it's forced on them in ways they can't do anything about, and as a society we owe it to them to do better and help them.
This reminds me, I should listen to some hardcore rap while my SO is out.
Exactly, imagine separate the book from the writer? Or the software from the developer?
Or painter from the painting(that one is OK actually) Like whaat, who does that?! Message VS messanger ? Pff mumbo jumboLol one of the last things I did on Reddit was get banned for mentioning "death of the author"
I was banned on Lemmy for suggesting that a Japanese beauty contest should be run with Japanese contestants. Instead of Europeans. I was banned for racism. One lemming was even persuading me it's actually impossible to tell who is Japanese and who is East European.
Moral piracy
Willem Dafoe?
right on point. i wonder why people keep believing that any work they enjoy/like/happily consume is made by a good person
Parasocial relationships go brrr
I was gonna say the same thing elsewhere in this post, it's even worse now that social media has made everybody's lives so much more public
though it's still strange because not all of our friends are perfect either. We're all people and we all fuck up, some more than others of course, but let's not forget being famous makes you the perfect target for false allegations & sensitisation of your actions that'll spread like wide fire because patience or fact checking doesn't get clicks
There are issues when the artist puts their problematic views into the media, but people were previously not paying attention. Harry Potter is a good example. Most people didn't really read too much into a children book series, but when JK started talking politics, people started looking more into the subtext of her books and realized all the libertarian politics in them. I personally bailed around book 4 or so because they were annoying me and now I understand why.
Xi liked Harry Potter, but even xi can see the slavery defence was weird. Xi always wondered why the good guys never tried fixing the socioeconomic problems that made the goblins and giants support Voldemort.
Is that a belief you've seen expressed though? Because I have a theory that Social Justice Warriors, and Snooty Moralists in general are somewhat extinct, and more than likely never existed at all.
They're the imagined enemy conjured by the right wing to make everyone have a feeling of having been judged, without any actual judges or judgements having been expressed.
A construct made of whole clothe , with no actual person present underneath, just propaganda pages and a feeling of having been wronged.
Xi is a social justice warrior. Xi is also a dragon rider who uses spells and magic weapons in battle with the forces of evil. Xi would forgive someone who was closed minded enough to think xi doesn't exist.
The only place I've ever seen this be true personally is sports fans. Sports fans love to talk about how they love athletes and how they're good guys. You see it constantly. Usually it's based upon PR stunts. Like there was a big one with current Browns quarterback to Deshaun Watson. Back when he was with the Houston Texans there was this big PR thing where he gave his paycheck to a lunch lady or something. There was a Reddit Thread about how awesome he was and what a good guy he was. Few years later there are like 40 women who are accusing him of rape and or sexual assault.
Sports fans get very invested in their teams Heroes and they think they know them. It's a danger we all face I'm guilty of it sometimes too I'm sure, but it's just real important to know that we don't know these people. It's true of all celebrities.
oh, they exist. but unfortunately they fail to see that the problem is not that the star rhey looked up to is acually a bad person (and therefor their work invalid) but that the very ideal of super-human like stars is the very mechanism that make those people get away with their behavior in the first place.
things wouldn't be half as bad if sexual misconduct of a beloved actor was tried as soon as it happened - and not swept under the carpet for some decades while the behavior continued to happen
Because I have a theory that Social Justice Warriors, and Snooty Moralists in general are somewhat extinct, and more than likely never existed at all.
The loudest, unironic SJWs I know are all performative. The most productive activists/volunteers I know don't make much noise on social media. The performers love saying "separating the art from the artist" type shit. One got really pissed off at me when I pushed him to drop WoW over the suicide and censoring of that tournament winner when he agreed that it was wrong of Blizzard to have done those thing.
The SJW types are absolutely over represented by the anti-Woke crowd. Ragebait all the way down.
