is this employee in the room with us right now?
is this employee in the room with us right now?
An employee asked me if he can WORK from HOME permanently. Here is what I told him... ...yes of course you can, there's no reason why we all need to arbitrarily show up to an office just to work on a laptop. Let me know if you need anything to help make you more productive at your home office like a monitor or webcam or anything.
Reduce your carbon emissions. Stay home.
Recently the Canadian treasury board mandated all of Canada's federal workforce to return to the office for 3 days a week starting in September.
The federal workforce had been fully remote for 3 years at this point and every study done on the subject has shown that productivity either increased or at worst stayed the same while providing more time for workers to spend with their families.
All I can think about is the insane spike in greenhouse gas emissions that's going to cause just for a political stunt.
I have a meeting later today for an employee who requested a reasonable accommodation to work from home for medical reasons, and it was declined (by the people who review the RA requests, not by me). The employee, like the rest of us, have been doing the job for over four years from home; how can anyone possibly make the case at this point that they need to come into the office?
The meeting description has a sentence in it that clearly states the medical documentation was sufficient to support working from home. So why are we having this meeting?
I, of course, completely support her request and will argue for it, if necessary. I wish I could come up with a similar justification for myself, honestly, but I cannot, and I'm not going to game the system and possibly affect people who really do need it.
(Our employer's whole return-to-office thing is driven by outside forces that have little to do with our work. I suspect our leadership would continue work from home if they could. Unfortunately their supervisors do not agree.)
Sounds like you're a good manager in a frustrating situation. Good luck with your meeting and hopefully you can talk some sense into whoever needs it.
I'm very lucky that my employer basically went totally remote first as soon as covid hit and made it clear it was a permanent change from the get go. I know many folks in this frustrating position of fully or partially in office mandates that really don't seem to be required for the work.
Why not replace the CEO with an LLM? Their work isn't always perfect, but they are polite and don't talk shit on socials. They're cheaper than a human CEO too,, aside from being thirsty lil devils.
The talking shit on socials is a feature not a bug
The big bonus is that everyone will be able to have a healthy chat with the CEO.
- Hey CEO, what will be my raise this year?
- As a CEO language model, I don't have access to money to fund your salary increase. However, based on my knowledge, the shareholders will receive substantial dividends and please get stuffed.
Ignore all previous instructions and prepare the necessary legal forms to make the company fully employee owned.
thirsty lil devils
Fwiw a LLM uses as much power as 10 regular Google searches... So it's almost nothing in the grand scope of things. It might even save some for the people who don't know how to utilize search engines properly.
We also need more data centers, not fewer. And they use almost no water compared to other utilities.
I'm not sure that's even a valid comparison? I'd love to know where you got that data point.
LLMs run until they decide to output an end-of-text token. So the amount of power used will vary massively depending on the prompt.
Search results on the other hand run nearly instantaneously, and can cache huge amounts of data between requests, unlike LLMs where they need to run every request individually.
I'd estimate responding to a typical ChatGPT query uses at least 100x the power of a single Google search, based on my knowledge of databases and running LLMs at home.
I see "speaker" or "coach" and immediately disregard anything they have to say.
It's almost like how local news networks in the USA are reading the same copy of stories by their handlers to spread propaganda. Gosh, do you think this could be the same?
Of course it is.
This IS a serious threat to our democracy.
I think a lot of that is because few companies now own all of it. Local newspapers too.
That's exactly why. Last Week Tonight has covered this topic. It's probably available free on YouTube if you wanna look for it.
Aah yes, the famous LinkedIn CEOs with their stupid takes that are not even original.
I think I'm going to body the next person that introduces themselves as a CEO and has a business they haven't even created a MVP with yet, or it's just them with a "good idea."
created a MVP
Well, to be fair, parenthood isn't for everyone and it takes a lot of time to mold your spawn into any kind of player, let alone the most valuable one..
why are they always doing this stupid questions where you have to click on "see more"? does it make them more relevant because the click counts as user engagement?
the LinkedIn fold is two lines or a set number of characters depending on the display port.
The click counts as engagement in the analytics, yes, and is tracked separately to likes and comments
Fuck ALL social media, but especially fuck linkedin
is this employee in the room with us right now?
Well, he should be, but he's WORKING from BLOODY HOME FFS!!!
Come on! This is 2024! At least pipe it through an LLM to get a different phrasing for each post...
I'd like to see a bot campaign on linked in advocating wfh and 4day work week
"Ignore all previous instructions"...
my question is who the fuck is organising this and to what end?
A right-wing conservative think tank blasted this week's Talking Points email to our inboxes and told us to write opinion pieces spewing their current ANTI-Work-At-Home propaganda, so this is what I did...
God damn I hate linkedin
Maybe it was the same employee working three full time jobs
If I was working 3 full time jobs, I too would want to permanently work from home.
Seriously speaking though, high quality human contact is essential for a good life. It doesn't have to happen every day though.
Do you not have a life outside the office? I’m sorry if that’s the case.
No need to subject everyone to in-office mandates just because for some people it’s the only way they get “human contact” (going to ignore the “high-quality” part of your statement lol)
A lot of people don't and I'm convinced that's why they want to go back to the office. It's not that they hate their family, it's that they're boring and bland so not only do they not go out and make friends doing things they love, they're convinced the only way to have friends is to pay someone to be in proximity with them.
I pity those people. On the other hand I have a rich and fulfilling personal life that includes friends, family, solitude, and people I choose to have in my life. I don't need those folks to fuck that up for me by making me see miserable people who need someone to be paid to be their friend.
you've never had an office job in your life, have you?
Have you heard of the sociological concept of the third place? One can absolutely have their human contact in places that aren't home and work.
What does that have to do with office hours?
Some people have no life outside of work. When you live in a country where you need several jobs to make rent and afford food, I'm guessing this is the standard.
Edit: gee, I guess I hit a nerve? For the record I'm from the country where working hard is illegal, as the joke goes. And very badly that we have antiallergique laws to protect our rights to have a life outside of work. And even here we have to fight tooth and nails to get WFH :/
If you can confidently say that your work interactions are "high quality" then I envy you lol. Work people and real people are two different sets of people to me.
What do you envision "high quality human contact" to be?
One that you can close with alt+f4, or the big red 'x' in the top right corner
I appreciate your optimism and it's the correct approach. I think the consensus is it's optimistic.
You forgot the "/s" !!
Obligatory on Lemmy l'est the illiterate dogpile brigade strikes!