What a completely reasonable and absolutely not wasteful use of police time and resources! "Hello, 911? My house is being robbed!" "Sorry, no officers are available because they're at the Tesla dealership"
Yeah sure...the thin blue line is BS. The police always protect the wealthy property owners and bust up the working class. I believe Netflix has a US police history documentary and who they side with during upheavals.
20-some officers protecting shitty hunks of metal, when there's murderers, rapists, pedofiles, and human traffickers roaming free. This image perfectly sums up their commitment to protecting the Lifestyles of the Rich and Fascist over the rest of us.
no, no, most of the pedophiles and human traffickers were standing in a neat little line with hands by their sides when this photo was taken, not roaming or doing said acts.
edit: wait, chicago, so there are probably a bunch more of them not accounted for in this picture.
Nah, most likely Tesla money. Most often when you see police performing a "private" function like this they're being paid by the requesting party.
Just like cops escorting a funeral procession or directing traffic for a church or private school, they're paid by whoever requested the service. Police departments are like any business. They got payroll to meet, obligations to cover, etc. They can't just yank cops from their normal duties for shit like this. They use off-duty or "*retired" officers.
Say what you will about capital hiring rent-a-cops, but they're probably not doing this on our dime.
* Buddy of mine was briefly a cop, could still strap on the uniform to escort a funeral or the like.
If that's the case... it's better, but I really would rather them not be able to wear the uniform or have police powers off duty outside of an emergency.
Just have some peaceful protesters staying on the other side of the street and have them in shifts, do nothing else. Waste the police resources until they give up and leave.
Their choice is to continue their career as a police officer. Obviously they will need to take some job to support themselves or a family, but there are so many options which don't require them to be a defense force of a harmful system, enforcing broken laws and harassing those who protest against it.
"And here we see Dora the Explorer on an acid trip. Notice how she's completely incapable of resisting licking her monkey, Boots. Even Swiper feels sorry for poor, wet, Boots."
Y'know, you raise a good point. If I was gonna go shopping somewhere and there was a line of cops outside the place I was going, I'm absolutely not going in there lol
Chicago has a pretty big police force unfortunately. Looks like around 12- 13k little piggies (source)
So about 25 cops here leaves... roughly 12- 13k cops in the rest of the city :P
ETA: fun facts, the Chicago Police Dept budget is just below $2 billion. That puts it right below Slovakia's entire military budget. Slovakia's population is ~5.5 million vs. Chicago's 2.7 million people.
Chicago alone has almost as many cops as the entirety of Ireland (which has 14.6k cops for 5.3 million Irish citizens)
That would probably work if there wasn't a ridiculous overabundance of cops in just about all American cities.
As it is, there's enough of them to function as a private security force for billionaires and their property (their primary raison d'être) in greater numbers than usual like this without neglecting any of their usual oppression of minorities, poor people, and especially combinations thereof.
Sure, you gotta still use stealth and planning, but you're dealing with a different level of attention.
Vandalism normally isn't a high priority in the cities I've been in. People report it, and the response time is slow, even in wealthy areas or business centers because it's just not an emergency. They'll dispatch a car or two, or the equivalent, but they won't send bigger numbers, and any kind of riot response is going to be slower because they're held back for the obvious target.
Same with small numbers of people making quick strikes at targets that support the main focus of the actions.
Couple that with coordination at targets and false actions to distract, and you can do some decent amount of work in the time you'll have
Artists, where is the "SSwastikar" where the first two "s" are the Nazi SS logo, the third s is an actual swastika and the "T" is the Tesla logo? I can't draw for shit and the AI generator I use flagged it for inappropriate content...
So i guess liberals are going to attack and burn certain businesses that they morally disagree with and in retaliation conservatives are going to start attacking and burning "woke" businesses. Eventually one side will emerge victorious and can rule over the ashes. Great plan America.
I dont understand targeting the Tesla dealers. Short term, I would think insurance would be a revenue recognition bonanza. Longer term, if violence continues, insurance rates would increase, so there's potential expense drag there.
All I'm saying is that targeting the commodity is misplaced aggression.
Tanking Tesla stock costs Musk a lot. Trashing unsold teslas means Tesla makes a lot of insurance claims. Short term that’s as good as a sale, well not really, the insurance only pays the replacement value which is less than the sell value, so it hurts their profits a bit, but it reduces stock and that does help a little. But if there’s a pattern of Tesla dealerships getting entire fleets destroyed, their insurance rates go up, which hurts their profits a lot more. So they’ll raise prices and sell fewer cars, which hurts their entire business.
Once or twice, it’s no big deal for Tesla. If the pattern keeps up then of going to start to squeeze them.
Musk has been a toxic asset for Tesla for quite some time, even before recent DOGE shit. I’m not sure why they don’t remove him. I get that he has majority shares, but there are still mechanisms for removing him.
Individual acts will never overshadow an organized movement. But individual acts may stoke the public consciousness, though they can also stoke those in power. It's a tightrope to be sure.