Project 2025's unpopularity continues to grow: New poll shows 57% with unfavorable views of it compared to only 4% favorable
Project 2025's unpopularity continues to grow: New poll shows 57% with unfavorable views of it compared to only 4% favorable
According to an NBC News poll published on Sunday, 57 percent of voters view The Hertiage Foundation's document as unfavorable.
At minimum 4% of USA citizens are complete monsters with hate in their hearts. It’s actually much higher, but for sure we say that 4% are awful people.
109 0 Reply33% of a country are always Authoritarians. Those are the people who vote to end democratic rule and install dictatorships.
33 0 ReplyThis sums up the recent election results in the German states Brandenburg, Thüringen and Sachsen, unfortunately.
4 0 ReplyI highly recommend that book. Lays out the problems with RWAs (right wing authoritarians).
3 0 Reply
My current estimate is ~20-40%
15 1 Reply7% of the 40% are the foolish following the dark triads.
5 1 Reply
4% is around the lizardman constant.
12 0 ReplyMore than that, the percentage of voters who opposed ending segregation was surprising.
I suppose we could start with 'the states that literally fought a war and killed their countrymen to keep humans as pets', though there's spillover.
1 0 Reply
4%
That's... That's pretty low.
50 0 ReplyStill too high
40 1 ReplyThere's some info stickers the Harris campaign sells if you want to help lower that for the people around you. Or at least increase the number of unfavorable view of it
https://store.kamalaharris.com/look-up-project-2025/
(Can also make your own stickers like that too)
27 0 ReplyThose are probably just the people who would benefit from it.
7 0 ReplyFalls in line with the lizardman constant https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slate_Star_Codex#Lizardman's_Constant
3 0 Reply
57% is also way too low. That sjould be in the 80s
11 0 ReplyAgreed, but there are a lot of low-information voters out there who have probably never heard of it because they don't follow political news closely.
9 0 Reply
That really depends.. if I gave you a drink with a 4pct chance you'd die an agonizing death.. would you drink it?
2 1 Reply0 0 Reply
We should take that 4% and put them on a remote island. We don't need to bother shipping over food, I'm sure their God will provide it for them and they'll all get to live in a blissful paradise.
40 0 ReplyIf Trump doesn't want to join the next debate it should be Kamala Harris arguing point to point against Project 2025 during the time slot. I would watch that.
39 0 ReplyShe should also spend some time tying Project 2025 to dimbulb donnie, too. He keeps claiming he "doesn't know her" when it comes to Project 2025, but that's nonsense.
15 0 ReplyA great opening segment talking about how it was made by trump staffers.
9 0 Reply"Project 2025 just got the coffee."
3 0 Reply
Project 2025 has a 57% unfavorable rating, but the party that endorses it does not.
Curious.
32 2 ReplyFans of the Leopards Eating Faces Party don't like it when it's their faces being threatened.
(They'll still vote for them, though.)
15 0 ReplyYou hit the nail on the head. Fans.
They support the team even when it loses. Never mind It's their own rights and lives that are being lost. Gang gang gang.
6 1 Reply
Well yeah, they want to eliminate the fucking national weather service. Project 2025 is a plan to stop governing and begin ruling.
27 0 ReplyThe other 39% view it unfavorably but don't have the spine to speak out against their own party when they know the poll results will be publicized.
28 2 ReplyOr they view it favorably, but don't have the spine to say the quiet part out loud because people would correctly label them as fascist monsters.
6 0 Reply
who are the effing 4%? I could see maybe 1% but less than one percent of that group would gain from it.
23 1 ReplyThe 4% are the ones who think it will help them until it is their turn to be the ones shit on.
15 0 Replyits dicks all the way up.
3 0 Reply
Same as the other 39% who apparently have no opinion.
10 1 ReplyLaw enforcement probably
6 0 ReplyIndeed, they wouldn't have to do their jobs. They could just arrest anybody on the assumption their mere existence is a crime... and thanks to Project 25, they'd probably be right.
3 1 Reply
the people who will inevitably cry like this.
4 0 ReplyCruelty is the point with these people.
2 0 Reply
Probably the people that think they'll be helping in the enforcement.
3 0 ReplyThe lizardfolk brigade.
In 2016, 96% of UKIP membership voted for (some version of) Brexit - their raison d'etre. 4% is a typical fraction of any group to be chaotically bonkers.
3 0 Replyoh man I remember brexit. was working with this guy from the UK and gave him so much shit and then just a bit later trump was elected.
1 0 Reply
No link to the poll, data, or polling methodology anywhere in the article. Does Newsweek still hire journalists?
9 0 ReplyNo.
2 0 Reply
more people realizing this would just make the us a dictatorship
7 1 ReplyNewsweek - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Newsweek:
MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.newsweek.com/project-2025-unpopularity-continues-grow-new-poll-1957581
5 12 ReplyAnd yet when piecemealed liberals and Republicans will completely embrace the aspects of project 2025. The same way they're doing KOSA which originated with the HF
10 109 ReplyNot as bad as schilling for the Russian plant Jill Stein— or acting like a traitor to promote a foreign power during an election.
You don’t know anyone like that, do you?
50 7 ReplyYou think everyone that's not voting for Harris is "shilling." Dude, you are shilling for Harris all the time. lol
3 16 ReplyLiberals are so desperate to smear anything that's a threat to their privilege in society and a perceived threat to the breadcrumbs that get tossed to them.
11 68 Reply
This is so self-evidently preposterous I don't even know what I could add to further refute it.
What do you think people hate about it, the name? Come on. Hatred for the proposals in it is the most bipartisan thing I've seen in a decade at least.
32 1 Reply27 4 ReplyNo.
16 2 ReplyKOSA which came from the Heritage Foundation recently passed the Senate 93 - 3
6 32 Reply