One candidate promised to murder more and that does make a difference.
You murdered Palestinians. I hope you're happy with your support of Trump's genocide.
If you don't care about reality when declaring moral outrage - sure.
If you gave a shit about reality you'd be aware that Warren has been on the right side of this issue for a long time.
You should see our UBI studies! We've got studies coming out our fucking ears.
No they won't... but rich people who can afford to support themselves while indulging in their love of making poor people suffer will be lined up around the block.
Making a position unpaid is a classic tactic to keep out the poors.
Oh man - health care is absolutely guilty of this. Residents and nurses go through hell to gain their professional credentials.
Well yeah - but technically everything is just algebra.
If it happens on a computer, it can be expressed in s expressions.
Gosh but I heard that all genocide is equal and Biden is literally the devil. Do you mean that having a meaningful impact on whether Palestinians live or die was worth swallowing my pride and voting for Harris? But isn't my ideal that no Palestinian should die more important than actually saving the lives of Palestinians?
/s I absolutely can't fucking stand people who were unable to realize that less harm would, in fact, be less harmful.
Organizations often put new employees through shared trauma to force a feeling of comraderie and submission to management so I don't see why gangs would be any different.
It's extra frustrating for those of us working in companies where ML is actually a useful tool that we've been leveraging for years.
Market Socialism - aka capitalism but debts are non-transferable so the value companies create are owned by their workers.
There's a similar sort of tussle going on in Canada. In Canada abortion is a constitutionally guaranteed freedom but given the shit going on in the US there have been discussions about passing a law to absolutely for sure double enshrine it. However the opinion from Supreme Court jurists among others is that passing a law guaranteeing it may weaken the protections because it'd move it from a universally recognized freedom to a law someone could reverse if the wrong party took power.
It's a really interesting discussion up here because that was essentially the state of affairs in the US (though Roe was a weaker ruling than our understanding up here) until yall had an activist Court that said "Fuck it" and acted illegally. So the question is "is it more likely for us to get chucklefucks in the legislature or the court, and if we're really clear about not passing a law because it's inherently accepted as a human right can we prevent it."
We do have a significant chucklefuck crowd in Canada (thanks American cultural export) so it's a concern but abortion access is extremely popular up here so it hasn't been turned into a wedge issue. (We do have stupid bullshit over trans rights, the environment, and indigenous sovereignty, though - in Canada all the scary stereotypes America has against black people and Mexicans are instead directed at Native Americans).
God fucking dammit. When you start a process like this it gives credence that the ammendment doesn't prohibit non-consecutive terms.
Fuck! This asshole is giving ammunition to Trump.
The UK has been in the grips of extremist conservativism for the past decade.
Fuck off and don't minimize what we fucking go through.
Switch over to only reading communities you opt in to - avoid political ones.
Yup, specifically "You won't have to vote anymore."
BC Pay Transparency Law Goes into Effect Today
The goal is to help address the pay gap between men and women
BC Pay Transparency Goes into Effect Today
The goal is to help address the pay gap between men and women
Fabricated Conversations
Just a sanity check here but... yall ever been mid conversation with someone and confused that they've forgotten a thing you talked about... until you realize that previous conversation took place entirely in your head?