Well, it's in large part dihydrogen monoxide. But it's less DHMO than the low sodium variant. So you've got to decide, do you want sodium chloride or dihydrogen monoxide?
The crazy thing is, most ham that's perfectly shaped isn't using any kind of meat glue or enzyme (it's basically only used on expensive cuts of meat), but just pressed together in that shape and naturally re-adheres during cooking.
"So essentially all boneless hams -- which are restructured products that consist of meat pieces bound together -- don't include meat glue, but rather salt-soluble protein as a binding agent that is extracted from the meat surface during a process called massaging, or tumbling."
Can we not gaslight and invalidate people for asking for less cancer inducing food?
When people say 'processed' or 'chemicals' colloquially, they mean excessive nitrates and nitrites which are carcinogenic. But you already know that. You're just being pedantic so you could kiss the ass of big ham.
It's astounding how effective the marketing was to shrug off regulatory concerns on nitrates and nitrites into an overreaction by 'ma'ams' and other grocery shopping women. Just take any valid concern and pin it onto an already ridiculed demographic and voila, you've made it popular with the internet.
I mean, folks here might not know that. I didn't realize that's what was meant. Of course, someone selling ham should probably be aware of this being one possible meaning...