The oldest-serving justice on the current Court has had health issues in the past but participated in arguments.
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, 75, sparked raised eyebrows over his whereabouts when he was absent during oral arguments on Monday, and the Court provided no explanation.
Chief Justice John Roberts addressed Thomas' lack of presence, according to NBC News' Lawrence Hurley, saying that Thomas "is not on the bench today" but would "participate fully" in the two cases being argued based on the briefs and transcripts.
"Context that may or may not be helpful: In the recent past, Justice Thomas phoned into oral arguments when he couldn't attend in person, allowing him to ask questions remotely. He isn't doing so this time," wrote Slate reporter Mark Joseph Stern on X, formerly Twitter.
He's taken the next logical step from "Napping through Oral Arguments" and is now skipping the actual hearings entirely.
He'll show up for five minutes to tell his clerks how to write their opinions, then catch the next flight out to a Bohemian Grove. Unless someone smuggles a syphilitic child into the old people Adrenochrome orgy, dude is going to live for another 70 years.
Moscow? Pfff... dude's chilling in a mega-delux RV in Dallas.
You don't need to fly all the way to Moscow for some plutocrat to pad your wallet. This is America! We took comically corrupt judicial appointments straight from its English roots and juiced it up with 19th century capitalism.
When reached for comment Chief Justice Roberts relayed the events that occurred that morning leading to Justice Thomas's unplanned absence. "I called him up and said, dude, you're on the schedule to work this morning. Where the hell are you? And he said 'bro, I'm like totally hung over. I was partying with these insurrectionists last night at a rooftop rave rolling my balls off. Babe, can you hand me that water bottle? No, that wasn't talking you Bob. Can you, like, call Ruth to cover?' And I'm like 'Hey asshole, I'm tired of covering your damn shifts. Ruth doesn't work here anymore, and you know that. Get your ass in here or I'm marking you as 'unexcused absence'. And he's like 'no can do, bro. I'm Audi 5000 today, see ya!' and then he totally hung up! I swear, I don't even think he wants this job anymore. I wish he'd fuckin' quit already."
Wow, I never knew such drama exists so high in our third brand government. Is this what the framers intended?
The most annoying part of this is that even if he quits wasting our oxygen, it's "too close to the election" for the Senate to do their jobs and confirm the replacement.
Nah, democrats have a majority in the senate and republicans removed the ability to filibuster Supreme Court confirmations in order to seat Gorsuch. The 60 vote requirement was still in place in 2016 when democrats tried to fill scalia’s seat, and enough democrats were unwilling to change the rules to remove that requirement. Now that it’s gone there shouldn’t be any issue confirming a new justice.
"Context that may or may not be helpful: In the recent past, Justice Thomas phoned into oral arguments when he couldn't attend in person, allowing him to ask questions remotely.
His time on the Court has drawn plenty of ridicule, notably in recent years following an April 2023 report by ProPublica that found that he had accepted luxury trips almost annually for more than two decades as the beneficiary of Dallas businessman and Republican mega-donor Harlan Crow and never disclosed them.
Last October, the Democrat-led Senate Judiciary Committee moved to subpoena Crow and other donors, calling it part of a wide-ranging ethics crisis.
Crow told Newsweek via email at the time that any such subpoena would be "nothing more than a stunt aimed at undermining Justice Thomas, but his office would "remain committed to respectful cooperation and a fair resolution."
Thomas received more grief last month after participating in the Supreme Court's decision to put presumptive Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump back on primary ballots in multiple states after he was removed in accordance to Section 3 of the Constitution, which bars former officeholders who "engaged in insurrection" from holding office again.
The justice was encouraged by many to recuse himself based on the ruling and ties with his own wife, whose actions surrounding the last presidential election have been put in the spotlight.
The original article contains 515 words, the summary contains 224 words. Saved 57%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!