I thought brave ended up having privacy issues? Is this no longer the case? I just recently switched to ff after being a chrome user for so long (went from FF to chrome long ago)
Some time ago I was tasked with solving some weird Internet Explorer bug. It was the only browser compatible with some governmental web app at the time and the company needed to access it.
When I went online to search for a fix, I encountered plenty of "solutions" saying "just use Chrome bruh" and "Chrome is much better".
Which didn't help a thing since Chrome was not compatible, which was also stated in the question.
I feel the same vibe here. I am an avid Firefox user, but saying to just change to Firefox isn't productive since that isn't always a possibility.
Or mull - made by mullvad, the VPN guys.
It has all the tor privacy without the tor network and gets updates because, unlike tor, it's not based on the ESR.
Fight me but I like how Chrome looks and feels. I also have zero issues with its functionality. Many people here are trying to paint it as if it's a bad browser but the billions using it tell a different story. The issue with chrome isn't chrome itself but the company behind it.
Will I switch if they start blocking AdBlock? Yes, but only because of this.
Just as a note: edge can be hardened to a point (clear almost all data on closing) where it's better than Firefox if you are interested in security over privacy or ease of use. If you are already bound to windows, installing Firefox offers marginal privacy in exchange for more attack surface.