Following President Trump's declarations about changes to the map, Google employees were given the highest level of urgency to reclassify the U.S.
Summary
Google has reclassified the U.S. as a “sensitive country” following Trump’s announcement to rename the Gulf of Mexico as the “Gulf of America” and Mount Denali as Mount McKinley.
The designation, typically reserved for nations with border disputes or strict governments, reflects the growing challenges tech companies face under Trump’s second term.
Google Maps has prioritized updating these name changes, treating them similarly to disputed regions like the Persian Gulf.
The reclassification may impact how Google handles U.S. geographic labels moving forward.
If the president doesn't shy away from using a politically incorrect word like that, then I find it entirely justified to use the same term when talking about him and the country he represents.
Only metaphorically. The snow where it should be, doesn't exist. This year alone, Florida has way more snow than Iowa. If that's not an indicator, I don't know what is.
I would typically roll my eyes at something like this, but in less than two weeks Trump has taken great strides towards destroying the federal civil service, any semblance of a rules-based international order and our relationships abroad, while doing everything but publicly endorsing violence against his political opponents.
The executive order gave something like 3 months for the secretary of interior to rename it. Trump's guy hasnt been confirmed as secretary of interior.
May be an unpopular opinion, but Google is right! It may also be that I’ve only read the headlines and am totally off-base, but ….
It’s not google’s business to decide what to call things, nor would they want any controversies attached to it. Every country and internationally has data with what they want to call things. It’s their right to do so, even snowflake countries trying to erase cultures and history. It’s in Google’s best interest to implement exactly what those official data sources call things, presumably those have gone through whatever due process exists, without regard to what they think is right or wrong. If there’s evidence of the country being a special snowflake, or launching a flurry of changes, it’s in Googles interest to implement those changes more quickly, but NOT to take matters into their own hands
Your comment reminded me of how Hollywood would remove Jewish actors from their films because they didn't want to stand up to the nazis.
Hollywood's decision to accommodate Nazi demands during the 1930s was driven by economic interests, particularly the desire to maintain access to Germany, then a significant film market. Studios made concessions, such as removing Jewish characters and avoiding anti-Nazi themes, to avoid being banned in Germany[1][3][6]. Despite many Jewish studio heads, profit motives often outweighed moral considerations[3][4]. However, this collaboration remains controversial, as it involved suppressing anti-Nazi content and sidelining Jewish actors during a time of rising persecution[6][8].
This is far different than choosing to filter themselves for appeasement. This is deciding to work with international standards and laws, and to stick with it as the best course even if they have an opinion. This is a business of publishing facts and Google should not be the arbiter of the facts
I agree, I don’t want Google deciding place names for anything. We already have processes and organizations that do that. My government may be getting more dysfunctional every day but it is their role
While I oppose these naming changes out of personal spite , oppose that it didn’t respect locals, oppose that it overrode Congress, oppose that it was done outside the law, it would be even worse if Google were part of the decision process. For better or worse there is a legal name and Google should just use whatever it is
This reminds of how when the unicode consortium had to add flag emojis, instead of opening the can of worms on what countries are independent or not, they just noped out of it and let the implementers decide which combinations of regional indicator letters render as country flags.
That's very interesting. Do you know where I could learn more about that decision? I tried searching but its 2025 and any phrases I could think of just returned websites offering nearly identical collections of flag emojis...
I get why you have to do it with China. You need to move on with your life, and you're going to be caught up in endless ridiculous squabbles, and life is short.
You KNOW you don't actually have to do it for Trump.
You're just deciding to. It's like in the movie, "How in the WORLD could this guy take the money, when he knows it's wrong."
Thw rest of the world will still see the original and internationally agreed on name.
If it was an internal waterway, the Americans could rename it whatever they want and everyone else would happily go along with it.
But, since the Gulf of Mexico is partially international waters, and since it has shores on multiple other countries, the US doesn't get to unilaterally decide what everyone else calls it.
Maybe if Google spent more time developing Gemini rather than renaming bodies of water they'd have a better product than the cheaper, more open DeepSeek.