They're coming for the doctor's next

That's my initial take as well. Legalize reducing costs for the insurance corps yet further..

Before she died, my mother would always prescribe me ketamine before bed. I can't sleep because I miss her so much, can you do that for me?

Yup, exactly this. Insurance companies don’t want to keep doctors on their payroll, because they’re expensive and inconvenient when the doctor occasionally says that medical care is necessary. But they want to be able to back up their claim denials, so they’ll need to keep some whipped doctors around who will go in front of an appeal and say “nah this person doesn’t actually need chemo. They’ll be fine without it. It’s not medically necessary.”

Now they’ll be able to just spin up an AI, get it licensed, and then never let it actually say care is necessary. Boom, now they’re able to deny 100% of claims if they want, because they’re expensive have a “licensed” AI saying that care is never necessary.

2025 food pyramid: glue, microplastic, lead, and larvae of our brainworm overlords.

Whilst that's a good point, it's not my top concern by a huge margin.

Didn’t take the Hippocratic oath either

That's their plan...

Did someone order a Luigi?

A real world response to denied claims and prior authorizations is to ask a few qualifying questions during the appeals process. Submit claims and prior authorizations with the full expectation that they will be denied, because the shareholders must have caviar, right?

Anecdotal case in-point:

You desperately need a knee surgery to prevent a potential worse condition. The Prior Authorization is denied.

You have the right to appeal that ruling, and you can ask what are the credentials for the doctor who gave the ruling. If, per se, a psychologist says that a knee surgery isn't medically necessary, you can ask them which specialized training they have received in the field of psychiatry that brought them to that conclusion.

I'm really interested in seeing the full text whenever that comes out, I agree and think this would be one of the first places they would use it.

So this means a few lines of code will get all the benefits of being a practitioner and bear none of the responsibilities.

This algo told me to over charge rent, I am not price fixing...

This is the new business tactic to extract while avoiding liability.

There is no recourse any person has here either. And the government is too corrupt to protect the taxpayers.

We are so fucked.

Through the hoof?

"Grok is your doctor now, and if you die we can make up the reason why"

But all this could be done without ai, or any sort of machine learning. If it is a simple positive negative test why not have a machine that vends and reads a colorful dots?

I’ll use myself as an even better example.

I have to take medicine for a chronic condition

• there is almost no chance of that changing, and the medicine wouldn’t be dangerous
• it’s not addictive
• not expensive
• can’t be abused
• it’s a common medicine with no black market value

Yet every 30 days, the doctor needs to write a refill. I never talk to him, there are no tests, I just leave a voicemail and they send it to the pharmacy the next day. That doctor adds no value.

Most of us would say I should at least be able to get 90 day supply or automatic renewal by the pharmacy. However a way to save the cost of that useless doctor without actually fixing anything is to have an “ai” do it. Or a cron job

I could replace doctors with rubber ducks super easy, too. It would even provide about the same level of care as an AI doctor.

that's unpopular take because it's wildly wrong