¯\_(ツ)_/¯ piracy is better anyway, I want full bitrate digital copies not compressed garbage.
Such a shame high bitrate full quality movies/TV shows will semi fade away as these asshole companies only stream their movies at 7 gigs an hour and never release physical media.
40GB Pirates of the Caribbean just hits differently. The black pearl coming out of an actual mist and not layers of gray that slowly recede because of compression is very awesome. FullHD with proper bitrate is enough for my 2m projector image, too.
I remember when an older netflix ceo talked about never having ads on the platform, there was some high and mighty principle about it... But then money!
Audiobooks as well. My wife only ever listens to audiobooks she can stream from the library and she has yet to run out of things to listen to after years of doing so.
Libraries are less likely to do movie streaming because the service costs them a lot more, but it's definitely worth checking.
Sadly, though, this may not be helpful for much longer.
Some films are beginning to completely forego physical release in favor of digital only, and we're veering back towards "You need a dedicated set-top box for movies" territory with computers and game consoles trying to do away with disc drives.
Devil's Advocate here, but I wonder if that could be a choice made by the creatives or the production company - like, "we hate advertising and don't want it shown during our show, so that's the kind of licence we will agree to".
I think a lot of people would applaud that sentiment of refusing to have ads in their show.
Unfortunately the result would be that for noble, purity of the art, reasons they end up accidentally screwing people in your situation.
Yeah, I feel like there is a lot at play even in terms of how the content is paid for. Maybe netflix only gets the ad money and not the creatives, in which case they don’t want their content on the ad version. Either way, the customer suffers.
I'm at lemmy.dbzer0.com - run by an anarchist but you don't have to be an anarchist to join, this instance is pro-piracy, and the instace where [email protected] is hosted. Only spam instances and lemmygrad is blocked, but hexbear isn't blocked
sopuli.xyz - run by a Finnish person - blocks both lemmygrad and hexbear, and spam instances
lemmy.ca - run by Canadians? (I think?) - also blocks both lemmygrad and hexbear, and spam instances
sh.itjust.works - this one seems like the only one that has no application the last time I checked I just checked and theres no application - also blocks lemmygrad and hexbear, and spam instances
lemmy.sdf.org - has zero blocks, so they federate with spam instances and possibly illegal content (CSAM) from other instances
lemm.ee - federates with all except 3: (threads.net) (lemmy.burger.rodeo) (burggit.moe)
Edit: I actually am worried about the instances that have low or zero blocks, there are CSAM everywhere, its kinda risky to federate with all.
I went back to sailing 6 months ago and dropped Netflix and Prime. I can get free shipping most anywhere now, but it's usually slow to get here. When I tried to watch a show on Prime and got ads as frequently as basic cable I was done.
My original reason to get Prime was that I was building a PC and the no-fuss returns policy seemed like good insurance against faulty parts. Some sellers blame problems on the customer or otherwise drag their feet on returns. TBH I hardly watch Prime anymore, but the ads really are annoying. It's like "Oh sorry, the pitted olives will have pits from now on."
For one you can read the article. But it's a long standing thing. When you license a film or show for streaming, you don't inherently get the right to show ads during it. Some studios specifically exclude the right, some charge more, some don't care. The deals made for some of the Netflix originals don't even allow it, so they can't show their "own" shows with ads. The reality is often times streaming services aren't even making their original shows, they're just paying a bunch of money for exclusive distribution in one or more markets. So, older deals especially, Netflix didn't negotiate for ad rights because they weren't showing ads back then. Some production companies don't want ads running during their prestige show.
"Netflix Originals" are content that is produced, co-produced, or distributed exclusively by Netflix. Note that last type. Anything they have exclusive distribution rights for can be labeled an original, even things they didn't make.
I've come to the conclusion that some people would be satisfied with an entertainment technology that does nothing but display ads. And it probably like 10% of the population.
This has existed for decades in the form of a game show called "The Price is Right". It's obscene that they break away to commercials when the show itself is just an endless parade of consumer products presented by beautiful humans.
Waiting 20 minutes through unskippable trailers, 4-5 different 30s logos, a 2-3 minute menu intro then a menu that takes 2-3 seconds to respond per arrow press?
Because a single movie costs like 3 months of ad-tier Netflix.
Have you looked at blu-ray prices lately? Shit is cheap af. I've been amassing a collection of Criterion Collection blu-rays, usually $30-50 each, on Amazon for ~$15 a piece, on sale consistently. Sometimes even cheaper (Blue is the Warmest Color Criterion Collection Blu-Ray was just on sale for $12.49 on Amazon). The sales seem to change regularly, so I just check every few weeks. And you get a ton of really cool extra shit on top of an amazing film transfer.
And that's for Criterion Collection. Regular blu-rays are often $7-10
Players can be expensive, but the most significant reason is probably having to get up and switch discs to watch something else. The vast majority of consumers have no idea how to rip a disc, nor the know-how required to set up a media server.
A good % of blu-rays these days come with a code that you can use to get a digital copy. I have never actually used one, so I'm not sure how it works or what bitrate/filetype, etc.