If a kid was able to do this by saving his allowance, then it can't possibly be very much compared to resources of a school or its surrounding tax base. Give the kids their food.
It's a news article from 2019 for Ryan Kirkpatrick at Westpark Elementary School (a public school in Irvine California). He paid off the debt for only his 3rd grade class (not the whole school, not the whole 3rd grade, just his class). It was a total of $74.50. However, the school still serves hot lunches to kids with a negative balance on their account.
Apparently he paid it anonymously. (???)
Just stating facts above, but yeah, my opinion is that all public school lunches should be free.
Every time I read about this I remind people of the Iowa governor.
The feds offered free money to help clear Iowa kids lunch debt.
Iowa governor Kim Reynolds turned it down because "we are in an obesity epidemic".
Read that a couple of times to yourself just to let it sink in. Conservatives are about hurting people just so they can get a couple of easy points in the polls, even if it means literally letting innocent children of poor families go hungry.
Obesity can actually be caused by not eating enough
No really, your body thinks you're in a time of famine and holds onto EVERYTHING it can... You also get more stressed which causes your body to store your adrealine as extra fat.
Wait what if everyone just paid a little bit of money so that kids could eat. Even people without kids would pay and it would just be taken out of their pay… or kids can go hungry…
I make my kids lunches every day. I still would if they were free, and school lunch should be free.
I wish I could comprehend why some people think hungry kids is OK. At the same time... I kind of don't want to understand them. I want them to not be selfish pieces of shit instead.
I am extremely cynical about the semi-frequent "fun runs" to raise money for cancer research or whatever in my city. It's usually upper middle / upper class people feeling good about themselves for raising a couple of hundred bucks each, and diverting traffic and trams on the weekend (when this affected me I was a cafe worker commuting on the weekends).
You know how else we could fund this cancer research, and way more than your feel-good bullshit? Oh yeah, we could tax you properly. No more capital gains discount, etc.
I feel the same about Movember and my company promoting it. You know how else we could raise money for men's health, company, you could pay more in tax. Just like a tiny bit more would be waaaaay more than the piddly little tax free donation you're kicking in.
Charity fund-raising is only necessary because of the failure of the state, mostly. In my opinion.
I really doubt his parents specifically are the problem. They seem more than willing to give him enough money to do so, usually if my kids give me a financial goal I can afford I try and make it easier for them to get that amount of money.
Long story short, because giving students lunch on taxpayer money would be socialist, the USA decided to charge children to eat food made by the school cafeteria.
In theory this is good if you want to send your kid to school with food to eat, you don't have to pay for lunches that your kid won't eat, whether directly, or indirectly, through taxes.
In reality, kids, or more accurately, their parents, either can't or won't pay for the food that their kids eat from the school cafeteria, most notably the former.
Instead of simply not feeding the kids, they just accrue debt for eating the food prepared by the school for them.
Thus, school lunch debt represents the worst of capitalism. The kids, and/or their parents are being billed for the children eating food.
It's weird to me because I didn't go to a school with a working cafeteria (one that makes food) until highschool, and it was basically just a cafe in the school, you paid for what you wanted when you bought it from the cafeteria. No money, no food.
I was always sent to school from grade 1, with a lunch in hand because of this. I understand the convenience of having a school able to prepare and serve lunch to the kids, but I'm not aware of any where I am that do that. To be fair, I haven't been in school that wasn't a college/uni, for over 25 years. Maybe things have changed here? IDK.
it is when the parents cant pay for a kids lunch at school, they have some leeway to go into the negatives but after a while if it still isnt paid the kids are denied the usual lunch and are given a cheese sandwich
happened to me on the ONE day they had fried chicken for lunch (and they never had it again for the rest of my school days). as a football player it was absolutely horrible because i refused to eat the shitty ass dry ass cheese sandwich and then i had zero energy for practice after school. school lunches shouldnt even be fucking charged its just a way for the school to squeeze some more money into their pockets
its just a way for the school to squeeze some more money into their pockets
It's not even necessarily that, it's usually just that the entire funding structure for the school doesn't allow them to re-allocate city/state funds to paying for lunches, and even if they did have excess funds they could switch over, it would then result in key programs needed for kids to graduate being cut, because they're so underfunded as is.
This is coming from someone who actively managed my prior high school's yearly budget, and had numerous instances of district officials willfully ignoring emails and calls until being contacted by a higher-up dispute resolution office because they, in the end, didn't have the resources to even stop serving illegally prepared (undercooked, not meeting nutritious standards, still frozen, etc) food.
That was even with nearly every student paying for lunch out of their own pocket. Our entire model for funding schools in this country is a disgrace from top to bottom.
Americans hate women, it's simple. Who is disproportionately affected by hungry children? Who has limited bodily autonomy? We can point to the Republicans for wearing that hate publicly, but Democrats haven't done their part to sign laws that would fix this. Women in America hate women too, it's weird.
I had never heard of free lunch before the US. Don't get me wrong, this is awesome but that was not something where I grew up (Europe). That being said, all education and higher education was basically free. No free lunches, but no crazy tuitions.
Where I live in norway it is not like you could buy lunch either. People made lunch at home and took to school. Usualy a piece of bread and slice of brown cheese. May be different in huge schools.
And anyways if someone had forgot, the teachers had a backup solution, for free.
Training them to be good little wage slaves of the future. Already indoctrinated into a system of oppression that they'll just accept because that's how they were raised and they think it's normal to owe money to everyone and never be able to be free.
Or, just maybe, he realizes he's in a better position than most of those around him, and is willing to give extra so their lives would be better. You know, socialism.
But in the past two years, child labor laws have entered the crosshairs of some lawmakers. At least 10 states have introduced or passed legislation loosening child labor protections, including New Hampshire. Now, Granite State children as young as 14 can work around alcohol and 16-year-olds can work an almost 40-hour week.
Because it exists somewhere doesn’t mean I assume it happens everywhere. But that doesn’t matter, I hate that it’s a thing in America and I would hate it if it were a thing in another country. I hate it here and I’d hate it there, I’d hate it anywhere.