Nope. And it wasn't important enough for me to bother finding. I just thought it would be an interesting test of degenerative AI's incapabilities.
I tried to use ChatGPT to find a song that had a particular phrase in it. I could only remember that phrase, not the song or the band.
It hallucinated a band and a song and I almost walked away thinking I knew the answer. Then I remembered this is ChatGPT and it lies. So I looked up through conventional means that band and song.
Neither. Existed.
So I went back to ChatGPT and said "<band> doesn't even exist so they couldn't have written <song> (which also doesn't exist)". It apologized profusely and then said another band and song. This time I was wary and checked right away at which point, naturally, I discovered neither existed.
So I played with ChatGPT instead and said "Huh, those guys look interesting. What other albums have they released and what hits have they written?"
ChatGPT hallucinated an entire release catalogue of albums that don't exist, one of which was published on a label that doesn't exist, citing songs that didn't exist as their hits, even going so far as to say the band never reached higher than #12 on Billboard's list.
ChatGPT is a dangerous tool. It's going to get someone killed sooner, rather than later.
Guns don't kill people. People kill people.
๐
Yep.
I thought it was a great tool.
But I still know how to use paper maps and a compass. Because electronics fail waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more often than paper does.
Get one that uses the right skin products, duh!
I eat most things with chopsticks, so it's a no-brainer to extend that to snack foods.
That works as well, but it's harder to direct in my experience. The fork+spoon method of twirling just works best for me.
Well, when I'm in Canada. Here I eat noodles with chopsticks.
Or learn to twist the spaghetti with your fork against the spoon. It took me all of about ten minutes to learn that.
I use the spoon method for pomegranates.
For watermelon, I like to slice it in a grid with a knife before using a spoon to eat it. Then I don't need a special spoon with serrations.
Wait, genius!? I thought we were talking about Sam Altman?
Thank you! ๐
They recently made the world's strongest suction cup.
I honestly have no idea how they pulled it off.
It has some applications, but far, far, far, far fewer than its advocates hype.
Worst: Using ChatGPT (In French: "chat j'ai pรฉtรฉ") for anything important. I spend more time checking its output and stomping on its hallucinations than it would have taken me to just write things on my own.
Best: Learning to say "no" when people ask you to do things you don't have time to do.
It ... shows the last line!? That's a very weird choice.
Different rices are needed for different uses. Basmati is one of the best for Indian food, for example, but it would suck for making zongzi. You want some kind of glutinous rice (I like Thai glutinous best for this) for that dish. And both would suck for sushi.
Why thank you! ๐
A page from...
- 22 Sep (Sun) - Greg
- 23 Sep (Mon) - Ian
- 24 Sep (Tue) - Greg
- 25 Sep (Wed) - Ian
- 26 Sep (Thur) - Greg
- 27 Sep (Fri) - Ian
- 28 Sep (Sat) - Greg
...the Gregorian calendar!
Thankfully I live a five minute walk away from my favourite restaurant in the world ... which makes Chongqing style hot pot. ๐คฃ
But don't worry, degenerative AI isn't going to result in lost jobs. Any job lost to AI will be replaced by other opportunities. You know, just like how nobody was thrown under the bus with computing; everybody who lost a job just learned to code and did better!
/s
You're missing the point of the exercise. You're meant to spend that billion on you and you alone, one million dollars a day, to show just how ludicrously large a billion dollars is โฆ and then realize that to billionaires it isn't enough.
Surprise, Sparky! I've also been in your nation. (I've likely been in more nations than you have towns.)
My starkly negative opinions of the USA and its toxic attitudes and society comes from direct personal experience.
Another fortnight, another fountain brush.
I already showed one of mine, but here's another. This is a ่ซๅ ฐ่ฟช (Mรฒlรกndรญ) brand and it's ... ah ... decidedly inexpensive. Everything you see in this picture (the brush with suction reservoir, 50 ink cartridges, ten copybook pages for calligraphy practice) cost the equivalent of about $1.40.
After shipping.
That being said, though cheap, the only part that's chintzy is the really badly plated plastic of the brush mount and the little plated plastic disks top and bottom. The cap and barrel are decent metal with fairly good what seems to be electrostatic vapour deposition coloration. (I chose "champagne" coloured.) Disappointingly, though the barrel is long enough for it, something inside of it prevents putting a spare ink cartridge inside of it. It will only hold one.
It has one advantage over the linked one, however: it's long enough that I can use the standard grip for Chinese calligraphy making it a perfect practice pen to carry with me. (Carrying a traditional pen and an inkstone is not practical.) This means I'm likely to start learning how to do it soon.
What is the most bizarre or unusual name for "GM" that a game has ever used?
For me it was "Hollyhock God" from Nobilis.
Why do game designers do this? Does anybody, anywhere, actually use these weird terms while actually playing?
Even when in the same jobs, men are much more likely to turn to the tech
I thought I'd share my current working pens.
This is a Pixelfed post for further information. TL;DR summary: Wooden barrels with machined brass section adapters and caps.
(CMV) The west is ethnocentric and hypocritical in its approach to international relations.
The "ethnocentric" in the title is coded languageยน. It was triggered by a paperยฒ I just stumbled over but is the product of by now over two decades of observation (and, to be fair, festering resentment).
I bring attention to a key phrase in the conclusion of this otherwise meandering and unclear paper:
> Thus, we suggest that policymakers in China consider emphasizing more on the reciprocity benefits and build a collaborative effort across the scientific community.
What. A. Coincidence.
A study published in the (western) journalยณ Humanities and Social Sciences Communications comes to the conclusion that the Chinese government needs to emphasize the benefits of open data sharing.
Yet the very same culture that preaches loudly "open data sharing" and other such nigh-utopian ideals, in a stunning example of "do what I say, not what I do" also practices the precise opposite. For example the Chinese are specifically barred from cooperation in space venturesโด with anything that NASA is affiliated with (which is, essentially, all space ventures and most such conferences).
This is not, however, just the USA and just China. Canada (my nation of citizenship), for example, routinely issues thundering condemnation of any nation that treats indigenous peoples badly (unless that nation is aligned with Canada, in which case Japan's treatment of the Ainu and Taiwan's treatment of their assorted indigenous groups gets passed over with an embarrassed cough) while it treats its own indigenous peoples in ways that are positively shocking even to this day, despite the facade of rapprochement. (Keep in mind that the last of Canada's horrific residential schools was closed in 1997โI was 31 years old at the time!โand that in Canada being a native means you are not a "visible minority", a term fraught with its own weird baggage.)
And you'll find similar ethnocentric, hypocritical bullshit all over the west, even down to all the (well-deserved!) official condemnation of Hamas over the October 2023 attacks while standing by in embarrassed silence as Israel commits open genocide both in and out of Gaza starting well before October 2023 and continuing to this day.
So... My current view is that western powers are a large collection of hypocritical twats whose views can and should be safely ignored by other peoples of the world as far as is possible when so many (chiefly) American guns and bombs are pointed at them threateningly.
Change my view.
---
ยน Decoding it: "white supremacist".
ยฒ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-024-03570-9
ยณ Yes the primary authors are Chinese in Chinese universities. There are reasons for this.
โด The fact that this has backfired, both directly and indirectly, on the USA multiple times is a never-ending source of amusement to me.
I had a little chat with Perplexity.ai
Just in case that URL doesn't replicate the session properly I've added a screenshot of the session to the end.
A few things are obvious here. First the choice to trumpet the "strengths" of degenerative AI while qualifying the weaknesses is clearly a choice made in the programming of the system. In later interactions it claims that this was not specifically programmed into it but, as it says, it's a black box and there's no way to confirm nor deny anything it claims.
Which is, you know, pretty much the reason why degenerative AI can't be trusted.
TIL that Albert Einstein was a real person!
Up until now I thought he was only a theoretical physicist!
Girls, if you visit a guy and he's got a large piece of red cloth tied to a long stick, be very wary!
That's a huge red flag, that is!