Some media outlets still use Twitter/X as a source for news and opinion, otherwise I wouldn't go near the site. Seeing some of the replies to a trailer for the upcoming Doctor who xmas special, I wonder why somebody feels the need to actively shit on a show they so clearly dislike:
Like most #DrWho fans, I won’t be watching. #DrWho is dead. The doctor is now black and gay, Sir Isaac Newton is now Indian, and the character of Rose is being played by a man wearing women’s clothing. #RIPDoctorWho #DefundTheBBC #DiversityHire
That quote alone has too many levels of wrong to pick over, but it will never not surprise me how little of the show's humanist messages these people have taken to heart.
Edit: Thanks for the "duh, Twitter" responses. I do think it's low hanging fruit to just blame the platform (which is, inarguably, a dumpster fire). Let's talk about reactionary fans instead, yeah?
That's true, but it's really deteriorated beyond its former lows. I assume the sensible voices that used to even it out got the hell out of Dodge when Musk took over.
There are some who remain there, but only interact with their own “bubble” of people that they’ve cultivated over the years. So whatever sensible people are there wouldn’t be responding to hashtags and getting involved in this sort of conversation.
Always good advice, as I said I'm only viewing tweets (through nitter) to make heads and tails of news items. The link above is also to a nitter instance so you guys don't have to visit twitter either.
I gets it my dude. Imo it's not about how you view the content, it's consuming the content at all. It's not that the site is bad, it's just that it seems nowadays everyone involved with Twitter is just kinda shit. Again - my opinion.
I am not on Twitter. I did find the first episode of the specials way too heavy-handed, but I absolutely loved the other two episodes. I love when Doctor Who has progressive messages but I want them to feel more organic and less like a morality tale.
I love the appearance of the new doctor and I hope they will not do the preachiness in the same way in the coming seasons.
Don't forget that Chibnall is just bad, and that letting him showrun the first female Doctor was a horrible idea. Genuine discontent allows for biggots to more easily insert their own agenda and steer the course of discussion.
I need to say, Chibnall wasn't bad bad. He just looks that way following runs by RTD and Moffat and, honestly, so would most other showrunners in the scifi/fantasy genre.
He did some middling series with a couple of clunker episodes, that's all. We've just been spoilt for quality in Doctor who post-2005!
Basically if the doctor isn’t a straight, white and cisgender man people lose their minds.
Oh, for sure. The funny thing is how they feel the need to bolster their position by claiming that "all" or "most" viewers share their bigotry. And that's not just Twitter, you see the same on r/DoctorWho when people need to convince themselves that {female Doctor bad|Timeless Child ruined Who|Chibnall is the great beast} 🙄
I went there once to talk about an episode I liked, just like "I really enjoyed tonights ep for X, Y and Z reasons"
All the replies were explaining to me how I didn't actually like it, or how if I did it was cause I hadn't watched the show before,, or just generally a hater. It was so odd. It's a toxic place.
This is super common among racists. You'll often hear them say "I'm just saying what everyone is thinking" or "I just have the balls to say it" that's how they justify it to themselves.
I never liked the announcement of not participating. If I stop playing a game or watching a show I just do it. I don't announce it. I think they have some idea in their head that they are going to get the creators to see how right they are and fix their issues with whatever it is. Its not gonna happen.
I haven't kept up with the series and I'm probably not going to start again right now, but is the doctor canonically gay? Like did he regenerate gay, or is the actor just very obviously gay and they don't address it otherwise?
So the new actor, Ncuti, is IRL "gay"- David Tennant is not, he has a wife and children and there's a whole Doctor Who story behind that too. But the Doctor has never been "straight", at least not for NuWho ( but there was some serious flamboyance in the classic series too). Jack and the Doctor kiss in the first season of NuWho and 13 fell in hard like with Yaz, her female companion. Plus there are scattered remarks throught the show that would make one question the Doctors sexuality if it mattered.
The Doctor is essentially omni-sexual. They fall in love with a personality not genitals or species.
No, it has not been writ in stone that the Doctor is now "gay". Ncuti Gatwa is queer although not public about what that entails afaik. In a recent special, David Tennant's Doctor did (somewhat to his own surprise) note that another man was "hot", but Donna commented that his queerness "was never that far from the surface, mate".
When it comes down to canon, the Doctor is a millennia old, time travelling alien that changes face every couple of years. If viewers are able to accept that and the other wild concepts of the show, they shouldn't have any trouble coming to terms with down-to-earth, real life things like the Doctor not being totally straight.
"duh,X" but hear me out. The signal to noise ratio on Twitter has always hovered around 50%. Ever since the upheaval, anyone with any sense has already left the platform. It's fully expected that on any topic, the toxic responses will be louder than reason.
I'm still watching doctor who, and I have to say that I love it, its the only show that keeps the story original without rebooting with 100 series.
edit: judge on your own, dont only read others stuff on twitter and go with it. Bots can be used easy now days to change opinion on something.