A highly compatible design with no ads, unnecessary images, videos, animations, scripts that goes straight to point delivering you exactly the information you need and nothing else? Something that's easily accessible even with old feature phones allowing older people to get information easily?
Simply something that loads instantly and just works?Who would want that?
304 1 ReplyFound the backend dev. "CUT THIS AESTHETICS NONSENSE! GIMME THE VARIABLE CONTENTS ALREADY! WE'RE 3.54 NANOSECONDS BEHIND!"
121 3 ReplyFrontend: "Come on, this needs at least some flair. This isn't the 90s."
Throws React at it
61 2 Reply
No one who is going to pay you wants that. All they care about is user engagement.
11 1 Reply
The page at the top looks perfectly fine. It's useful, it gets the job done and it's lightweight.
134 2 Replyalmost as good as the motherfucking website. :D
54 2 ReplyI like the better motherfucking website
43 4 Reply
It's almost fine. It needs to include units for the measurements.
19 0 ReplyYou sound like a backend developer.
16 0 Replymaybe 🤣
5 0 Reply
Oh thank goodness my browser doesn’t have to download hundreds of js and assets just to use a damn calculator
4 0 Reply
Good, that we have specialists for both and nobody is advocating that everyone should be doing full-stack work... oh wait.
110 1 ReplyFull-stack development and devops: When you need an entire IT department but only want to pay for one person.
51 0 ReplyAs a full stack developer I can assure you I can easily produce the result displayed in both those panels in the image 😏
40 0 ReplyIn fact, I probably will make both of those first intentionally or not.
3 0 Reply
"Full-stack" is just a term invented by stingy employers who try to get 2 for the price of 1
12 0 ReplySpecialists, ah I wish I could experience that. Maybe then I would be able to see my long lost love c++ again. Instead, I must give my love freely. Javascript, Java, Kubernetes, Go, many names flit through when profit is the goal. Someday maybe, hopefully, ChatGPT will end my tired soul.
5 0 Reply
The top one's a motherfucking website, indeed.
95 0 ReplyRIP txti.es
22 0 ReplyWhat happened with it?
4 0 Reply
motherfucking website
One of my all time faves!
11 0 Reply1 0 Reply
what is wrong with this frontend? not enough ads? loads too quickly?
71 0 ReplyI would hire you as my lawyer.
23 0 ReplyNo designated time zone.
10 0 ReplyNo cookie banner with the worst dark patterns of UX imaginable
4 0 ReplyHonestly, no units
2 0 ReplyIt's the temperature in Paris so I assume it's Celsius.
0 1 Reply
just missing some flexbox basically
love me some flexbox
1 0 Reply
64 0 Replythat's what i call a sexy website
8 0 ReplyAlso: Real websites like this don't have DRM. GOOGLE.
8 0 Reply
As a backend developer who occasionally has to work on the frontend, that top image is pretty accurate although it requires bootstrap smeared all over to pretty things up a bit. After that it will have the "Good Enough" seal of approval.
62 0 Replyin Paris
in Paris
in Paris
in Paris
What is this bloat? Trash site.
52 2 ReplyHonestly you don't even need to make the text field visible. If they can't touch-type that's on them.
15 0 ReplyI would prefer a dropdown list of all possible coordinate combinations.
20 0 Reply
It's meant to be used like this:
curl localhost:8000/?city=Paris | grep Temperature >> TemperaturesOfTheWorld.log
6 0 ReplyWho was in Paris?
5 0 ReplyI mean maybe B'Ellana if Tom was into some kinky shit but we aren't talking about Voyager right now.
5 1 ReplyWhat's a Paris?
3 0 ReplySome fine gentlemen.
2 0 Reply
You can see the programmer used Copilot, who in their right mind would want to type <?php echo htmlspecialchars($city); ?> four times
2 0 Reply
God I wish weather pages were more like that first one.
49 3 ReplyI like to use this one: https://wttr.in/
You can get info for a specific city by appending it like this: https://wttr.in/newyork
35 0 ReplyTysm
4 0 ReplyIt seems to be down right now, but if i remember correctly this one also works when you are using a terminal and curl, i.E.
curl wttr.in/newyork
Edit: It works again, you can use the command as written above :D
1 0 ReplyNice thanks.
0 3 Reply
I can make HTML look alright if I have to and it's simple enough requirements.
The real hell is making it look good in an email. Oh, you used something from the last 20 years of HTML/CSS progress? Well fuck you.
31 0 ReplyAfter some time toying with CSS I have decided to fuck it and whenever I need to make a website I will just either:
- Make a plain website with no virtually no styling.
- Use bootstrap or some other similar shit.
21 0 ReplyI used to like bootstrap. Still do. But it has some faults... Depending on your needs you're loading a lot of CSS you aren't using.
Bootstrap 5.3 is 59kb before gzip. 6700 lines of code. That's a lot to just apply some simple styles.
There are a ton of lighter weight alternatives nowadays.
2 0 Replyit is a required subject at my school
1 0 Reply
No bloat, no Javashit, no problem
17 0 ReplyFrom my experience, devs be like:
Backend, yay! Frontend, nay! ... and I the end, not even the backend works properly.
15 0 ReplySo in the end, it doesn't even matter?
24 0 ReplyI TRIED. SO. HARD.
21 1 Reply
“Hey Bob, you did add a retry when you added that call to service X?
Umm, no?
Oh for fuck’s sake!”
All the fucking time.
5 0 ReplyI much rather frontend that backend, I like making things that people actually see.
3 1 Reply
As a java/python developer who has been hooked to front end since last 3 years I feel this is apt !.😂😂
9 0 ReplyI'd rather play pacman
11 0 Reply
A proper backend developer would have the query be a URL using the GET method with a parameter that the user can fill-in directly in the address bar and the result be a text/plain page with just a bunch of numbers separated by pipe characters (or an application/json page with that info encoded as JSON if you wanna be fancy).
This has the added advantage of working both for humans and as an API for use in machine to machine communications via HTTP.
8 0 ReplyThe frontend developer made the backend so inefficient that it runs out of memory
7 0 ReplyThey have this cool hack where they emulate Edge within Node.js and then run their stuff as a webpage within Edge.
3 0 Reply
why am i both
5 0 ReplyThe simple form that shows 503 on submit?
2 0 Reply
Shots fired! Shots fired!
4 0 ReplyAsa backend dev, it should be a 503 error. I live in 503 land.
3 0 ReplyLooks like a perfectly fine frontend to me.
2 0 ReplyWhat if I want the weather in Paris, TX?
2 0 ReplyYou need to fire a gun and to a really good bald eagle impression.
1 0 Reply
I do front and backend work. Biggest issue I see is people not thinking through interfaces properly (e.g. efficiencies & atomicity of operations), sanitizing inputs on both sides, error handling, and putting in the appropriate validation, authorization & testing.
1 0 ReplyMy SO just said your comment applies to sex just as well 🤣🤣🤣
1 0 Reply
As a full stack dev I'd like to say that the issue I see most from backend devs isn't a lack of styling, it's their need to wrap every element in 15 motherfucking divs. They don't seem to understand that most html elements are self contained and can stand on their own.
0 0 ReplyAkshwallyyyy those are both presentation problems, eg frontend
Edit: to those downvoting me please tell me why a frontend dev would end up showing a raw error like that on a page
1 4 ReplyFront hand back hand?
1 5 Reply