Yeah, no shit? Life in America is terrible, why would anyone willingly join?
Literally a "developing country" except for the ultra-rich. https://theconversation.com/us-is-becoming-a-developing-country-on-global-rankings-that-measure-democracy-inequality-190486
Meanwhile, 60% in favour of EU accession and those are numbers from just before the current escalation and with the fisheries policy still being a giant unsolved issue. Might actually fall under the bus because tough luck getting the parliament to reform it if there's no need and with all those minerals Greenland isn't as keen on fishing, any more.
Greenland used to be part of the EU
Important note: 497 participated in the poll. Still seems statistically like a good sample and am happy about the result!
Source: https://www.berlingske.dk/politik/new-poll-shows-overwhelming-majority-of-greenlanders-reject-trump
497 participated in the poll.
wow, thats almost half of the population!
At least ist almost one percent of the total population (~57000), from which those not eligible to vote (children, foreigners) need to be substracted.
If the polling organizer did its job correctly and removed bias from their sampling, a beautiful law in statistics has been proven, stating that small-ish samples are representative of the whole population if it follows e.g. a normal distribution. It's called "law of large numbers".
That's 1% of their population. For comparison, if you polled Spain's 1% of population, it would have been around 470.000 people (I'm using the 47.000.000 population from memory though)
Is there a poll Americans can take? I'd be interested in that too.
It is not for you decide Donald Trump, it is the choice of the Greenlandic people. No means no.
I don't think Trump or his buddies know that, no means no, nor would care even if they did.
Trump makes it a point to brag about not knowing what "no" means
"Your country, my choice."
- Trump, probably
so 2 voted in favour, 3 withheld, and the remaining 28 citizens voted against?
The poll included 497 participants which is enough to represent the population of 57 000 with a statistical uncertainty between 2 and 4 percent.
I was joking but thanks for the info :)
6 and 85 have no common factors, so this implies that they must have asked some seals as well.
what makes you think these numbers are exact? 2÷33 = 6.06% and 28÷33 = 84.84%
so the seals didn't necessarily get a vote but I hope they did
Wow, I didn't think he'd be able to crack the single digits!
I think this poll is a little early, atleast let the US take Greenland to McDonald's before they can consent to being fucked.
With our new president? No consent sought...
I'm now curious what those 6% were thinking. The no is basically the default. What males those few say they want to join the US?
As a German, I'd be more than happy to have only 6% of people voting against the interest of the country..
A general rule with polls is that you'll never get a result below 5% on a question with 2 options. Those people mostly weren't paying attention, didn't understand the question, didn't care or intentionally chose a contrarian response.
Yeah, I just want the results of the secondary poll that asks the why. It'd be interesting just to see the real answers.
Everywhere has some Nazis.
6% got paid* by vance
*payment has only been promised, not yet given lolol
!dataisugly
When did 'no' or the law ever stop this guy?
The 6% were those maga idiots who visited.
Oh they’re just playing hard to get
Fake news. The human Cheeto said otherwise and I only believe what he says.
Now poll the Americans. How many of them want to include Greenland?
Nobody cares what the Americans think about this, since they are the Aggressor in this case
They would be, but the opinion of the common folk lend a lot to where a particular war goes. The United States are not as top-down as the administration and media would have you believe.
The Iraq war had a lot of initial support which dropped off quickly. This war? I don't even see it having that first push support.
