the best home server is a computer you're not using, the second best home server is a bajillion dollar server rack you looted from behind a meta LLM farm
I'd say not just starter... My rack is full of tiny/mini/micros. Proxmox on all, data on the three NAS boxes, easy to replace a box if needed (for example, the optiplex 7040 that the board died on).
Way quieter than a regular rack, lower power use, etc. If all goes well following an intended move, I should be able to safely power it off solar + batt only. Grand total wattage for all these boxes is less than my desktop (when I last checked at least, I was running about 300-350W. I did swap two that have dgpu's now, so maybe a touch higher).
I recently got a M710q with an i3 7100T. It uses around 3W on idle. I threw 8GB of RAM and a 512GB ramless NVMe for a total of under 100€. Absolutely would recommend (if you don't need too much storage). Also Dell has some machines.
For more info, servethehome (they have a YouTube channel and a blog) has a whole series on "tiny mini micro" machines.
Good choice. I think people often invest too much into hardware and SBCs, when an old laptop does just fine. Just monitor the battery or remove it, if you run that for years and unsupervised in the broom closet.
Depends. If you want something that will keep your files reasonably safe and accessible then a laptop isn't great because most of them won't let you mount multiple hard drives without doing something silly like running everything over USB.
Of course that's where an old desktop is the computer of choice.
Yeah, it really depends on the use-case. I've attached several external harddisks via USB to unsuitable hardware before. That kinda works, but isn't a good choice. But for some selfhosting of Bitwarden, home autiomation and calendar sync, an old laptop is more than enough. After that I bought an efficient mainboard, lots of RAM and built my own NAS for my files, and it does the other stuff as well.
I started out with a laptop and it worked fine, but I always wondered, wouldn't the energy consumption be much higher? Even with the screen off, a laptop isn't made to run 24/7, right?
I think it's mainly the battery that isn't made for 24/7 charging. The other components are fine. And as a laptop is made not to waste electricity, it's efficient with the energy consumption, too. Just turn off the screen and it'll use as much as a Raspberry Pi or less...
Your suggestion that racks of server hardware shoved into a shoe closet is unnecessary overkill betrays the very ethos of selfhosting! Your dangerous philosophy of minimalism and efficiency cannot be tolerated!
My only "server" is a modest DS218+ which runs more mainstream services that I see in those huge ass servers like in the pic, what am I missing? (I have 6 GBs of RAM):
Plex-Auto-Languages (for the Synology PMS and my Nvidia Shield TV Pro)
PlexTraktSync
Portainer
Qbittorrent
Riven/Rclone/Zurg
Speedtest
Tautulli (X2)
Vaultwarden
Zerotier
Everything is silent and running with Docker, aside from a bunch of stock Synology services (and Tailscale), I really feel like the only reason to own better hardware is for a better transcoding experience... And usually you don't want to transcode.
dayem buddy thats cool i'm still a noob in selfhosting and using docker im using some containers like adguardhome and metube photoprism and memos still tweaking cuz i started 1 week ago
Homelab = I have a bunch of computers I experiment and learn with, often breaking stuff and starting from scratch
Self-host = I have a bunch of computers where I run my own email service, I replaced Netflix with plex/jellyfin, I have a Minecraft server for my friend group, etc
I don't know if I can completely explain the difference, but I would classify myself as a home labber not a self-hoster.
I use Proton for email and don't have any YouTube/Twitter/etc alt front ends. The majority of my lab (below) is storage and compute for playing around with stuff like Kubernetes and Ansible to help me with my day job skills. Very little is exposed to the Internet (mostly just a VPN endpoint for remote lab work).
I view self-hosting as more of a, "let me put this stuff on the internet instead of of using a corporation's gear" effort. I know folks who host their own Mastodon instance, have their own alt front ends for various social media, their own self-hoster search engines.
Is having a bunch of oscilloscopes in your electronics lab self-hosting now ?
Using old laptops or other repurposed computer for self-hosting is just great! Who does have an old computer collecting dusk in their home ? Anyone had the potential for self-hosting :)
I think the issue for some people (why they may buy expensive hardware) is that their server is not “enterprise grade”, literally meaning a whole server rack with a SAN, firewall, etc. If you’re new to this hobby, please consider this unsolicited advice:
Use whatever hardware you already have or buy only what you need to achieve your goals.
Some people want to “cosplay as a sysadmin” like what Jeff Geerling sells on his tshirts. That can mean doing this stuff for fun or maybe self teaching for a job. For those folks, buying “enterprise” could possibly make sense. But I would argue that even the core concepts of that hardware can be learned on stuff you already have.
Enterprise hardware is loud, inefficient, and will likely have idiosyncrasies that making them run at home kinda suck. An old laptop is perfect as a place to host stuff or play with software.
One of the things engineers/admins have to do in a datacenter is plan for rack power efficiency. That often means planning for the capacity you are going to use, for the space you have and choosing the cheapest solution for that.
I think its considered generally more impressive with how much you can do within the constraints you have, vs having so much capacity for a cheap price. Like, how many services can you run on a Raspberry Pi? Can you create “good enough” performance for a storage area network using just gigabit? The skills you get by limiting yourself probably out perform working with “the real stuff”, even if your purpose is trying to get a job. I’d argue the same for folks who simply want to self host. Run what you got until it stops, and then try to buy for capacity again.
Your power bill, the environment, and your wallet will thank you.
Downsizing from an ex biz full fat tower server to a few Pis, a mini PC and a Synology NAS was the best decision ever here.
The new hardware was paid for quickly in the power savings alone. The setup is also much quieter.
You don't think about power consumption a lot when working with someone else's supply (unless it's your actual job to), but it becomes very visible when you see a server gobbling up power on a meter at home.
You're right about the impressiveness of working creatively within constraints. We got to the moon in '69 with a fraction of the computing power available to the average consumer today. Look at the history of the original Elite videogame for another great example of working creatively and efficiently within a rather small box.
In my case, 2 USB 3.0 hard drive enclosures with twin drives, in ZFS mirror configuration. I keep the the disks "awake" with https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/hd-idle, and it meets all my needs so far, no complaints about the speed for my humble homelab needs.
So far I haven't needed mass storage. The Mini Pc itself has a 1TB nvme drive, which I could expand upon since there's space for another 2.5 inch drive inside the case, plus USB ports for external drives. Obviously not close to a real NAS, but again, so far I have not had any need for that.
I got like 6 old computers from 2000 to 2016 all doing different things. If I had a choice between a high end server and cobbled together mess I would always choose the mess. Lot more entertainment and fun to figure out
Mine are a bit more recent (2012-202*) but same thing. Old hardware gets used for something, my "server" is just my old i5 11500k with as much ram as I could throw at it and as many drives as I can fit in the case. Oldest is a laptop that's my bench computer.
Helps me justify upgrades, hardware's been capable for a long time, always impressive to me just how capable things are, and sometimes it's part of the fun (if you enjoy problem solving) to work around limitations. Off-lease enterprise stuff interests me, would need to figure out where it lives though.
Here's mine. Might need to repaste it tho, the fans are literally always running pretty noticably loudly and CPU temps are at ~49° even though it's idiling all the time at max 1%-2% CPU usage.
On a side note - is it normal for Redis to always be using 1-2% CPU even when there's no traffic?
I use an Asus laptop I bought during COVID as my server. I dropped in 64GB of RAM, a pair of NVM drives and an old 2.5” SATA SSD. More than enough for my use cases. The only real software tweak I made was limiting battery charging to 60%.
For my Asus laptop the setting is maintained at the hardware level. I didn’t bother trying to find Linux software that could control it (I think there is one) but instead just booted into Windows and set it there and it will persist after that in Linux.
Dynamic DNS or static IP. Whatever is convenient for you.
If humans are connecting, it is generally prefered to type in a domain name, rather than an IP address.
For local services? - just type in static IP that I've assigned myself, otherwise I have a subdomain pointing to my online services. works like a charm
I just have a used Dell T3600 I got for like 50 bucks at most? Desktop form factor and quiet fans mostly, but still has 32GB ECC memory, 8 core CPU and a full size PCI-E slot to put my 1070 Ti in for transcoding in Immich and Jellyfin, secondary stable Diffusion setup and such and such.