Republicunts have lost their goddamned minds. That this is seen as necessary, even at the margins, means the Republic is fucking lost. All for an orange traitor shitcunt.
I can understand that a populist leader could create an authoritarian state in America, but I'm still in disbelief that it's this guy who they chose to be their god emperor, to be immune from all laws and criticism, to save them from the "elite".
I mean, this guy?
The overweight geriatric dementia-addled billionaire (who wasn't even that until he grifted his way there last presidency), who is the epitome of the "elite asshole" stereotype Fox News was demonizing for decades before 2015, a New York silver-spoon-sucking, sell-your-mother-for-a-nickel elitist who couldn't even be a successful used car salesman?
This guy is the one?
I mean, c'mon, America. Maybe we don't deserve the top shelf stuff, but this is some serious hangover-inducing self-hating well-liquor-binge level of bad judgement.
Exactly .... why bother with a complicated justice system when one person can step in to ignore the entire process. The fact that one individual can pardon others means that it is an incomplete and flawed system.
It was originally created as a check / balance. But now that the legislature is completely neutered to hold the executive branch accountable, and the supreme court has made itself subservient to the executive, we're just... You know... Fucked.
I mean it should be updated that's for damn sure. But the average person seems to think that it is sacrosanct despite the people who wrote it saying otherwise.
And then what? A vacuum gets filled by something else. We do need to reexamine some of the archaic ideas just like its writers thought we should and would. It's short-sighted because we've hung onto old words for so long we can't even agree on what they mean. Jefferson has some good quotes on how expecting laws then to apply to a future society is ridiculous. And yet here we are...
"The issuance of these pardons should not be mistaken as an acknowledgment that they engaged in any wrongdoing, nor should acceptance be misconstrued as an admission of guilt for any offense."
Although the Supreme Court's opinion stated that a pardon carries "an imputation of guilt and acceptance of a confession of it," this was part of the Court's dictum for the case. Whether the acceptance of a pardon constitutes an admission of guilt by the recipient is disputed. In Lorance v. Commandant, USDB (2021) the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that "there is no confession and Lorance does not otherwise lose his right to petition for habeas corpus relief for his court-martial conviction and sentence. The case was remanded for further action not inconsistent with the court’s opinion."
He knows what the majority of people aren't ready to accept, which is that we've functionally become a dictatorship for at least the next 2 years. Republicans have already proven they'll harm any family they can reach with the "conversation" about whether Jill should be allowed to be called a Dr. since she has a PhD and not an MD. The charging and excessive sentencing of Hunter. Not to mention those who stand for justice like Letitia or Fani.
My issue is this makes it quite likely that in the possibility of a return to democratic control in 2028 that Trump will pardon his families and friends actual crimes since the precedent has been set (Though he'd probably do so anyway at least for Ivanka).
He was pardoning corrupt politicians and family at the end of his last term, “the precedent” being set already happened and that ship sailed a long time ago. Biden didn’t do anything new that his political rival and replacement hasn’t already done.
How come ole Joe didn't pardon all the democrats in America if we wanted to save people from the wrath of Trump? He had the constitutional power to do it after all...
Because the pardons have to either, name individuals, or specify a specific group of people, like "Members of the Jan 6 Commitee" or "Any Persons who have avoided the conscription pertaining to the Vietnam War."
Something like "All Registered Democrats" would be too broad and this 6-3 conservative supreme court would definite step in and void it.
Who says a specific group of people can't be, "All Americans?" There's nothing in the Constitution that provides limits on the pardon power. In theory, if they wanted to, a president could issue a pardon for every American for every violation of federal law ever committed.