This is bullshit, it defined but didn't even use the continuous functions 🍇and 🍍.
golang is gonna be fuckin pissed when it finds out
IMSA kid?
Those are backups in case the other functions break down.
Its probably reasonable to say that 25% of math majors cant solve this, therefore non-math majors aren't people
"sup" without a "\" belongs-to-set symbol \[ and \]
scrödinger's TeX
I mean, technically, it is true. At least 25% of people can't solve that.
Yes I can, as this is just the metric induces by the L-infinty norm. But why did we introduce 🍇 and🍍?
I can answer the question. No.
He’s right.
Look at this shmuck, using the supremum of a continuous function on a closed interval when it clearly achieves a maximum. I bet they’ll feel real embarrassed about that one when they’re falling asleep years from now.
Christ, it's like people just don't even give a fuck about the extreme value theorem anymore?
I get you are joking, but I've seen many literature just using sup for maximum. Maybe for consistency or laziness, idk why
I am waiting for someone to actually answer this
Thanks. I've mostly forgotten real analysis by this point but the meme seemed really familiar, lol.
Thanks for the link. I expected there would be a problem with triangle inequality but didn't want to do the actual proving 😅
Oh, I expected it to be some unsolved problem.
🍊🍊🍊🍊
By using 🍊 to rate how good this post is(out of 5), i made it a metric for how good this post is
The function is a homeomorphism on R, so it preserves its topological features.
Nyar!
