The page is arguing for readable, informative link titles, not url literals

Maybe make blocking a public thing, so when you respond to someone you get a warning "this user has blocked you, they will not see your reply" and then show to others that a comment is responding to someone that blocked them? This may help prevent a lot of confusion. Though I see the increased risk of harassment that comes with it... I guess you really can't win this

yes!

Very likely not him, and he's like the 20th candidate whose been paraded by the news

Ironically, that's the kind of "issue" you need trustworthy banks for. The thing crypto was meant to replace. But none of the crypto exchanges that exist are trustworthy enough

I imagine it'll shift the mentally on electric heating (mainly through heat pumps) first. People have been outright hostile towards it, but once energy's free or negatively priced at peak, people will want to make the switch. People who own a large reservoir and a decently sized battery might be able to not pay for any heating or electricity in a good month.

As for industry, those that can allow for flexible production schedules will and in parts already have adapted to fluctuating energy prices. Whether that means less production in winter, or just adjust workflow so peak demand is during peak supply

I've seen that person in several threads now, always shilling for nuclear. I'm not sure why, but it's always been at the expense of renewables

Alternatively, have a horizontal acceleration of >0 after throwing

rightfully? depends on the cars

Nuclear is consistently among the most expensive ways to generate power, and only afloat due to massive government subsidies, especially when it comes to waste storage. Whereas solar and wind are only beaten (in some metrics) by natural gas when it comes to power per dollar, getting even cheaper at scale.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source

Your original point was that renewables are being blocked by China, Russia and the Middle East. I disagree on China, but that's not the point. How will nuclear, with all strings attached, succeed there, whereas solar and wind won't? Silliness.

You don't want to know

The same can be said for nuclear. Potentially even more so. 3 countries produce almost all of the world's uranium. What if they stop selling? You can build a domestic solar panel industry if you want, you can't magic a uranium deposit under your feet. Nuclear is slow, expensive and a national security risk. Renewables are none of these things. Stop shilling for the energy companies that want to keep their monopolies.

What exactly does nuclear change about Russia, China and the middle east? That's a massive non-sequitur

Besides, think of China what you will, they've been key in driving large scale cheap solar

Poison the monk

They're microwaves spread out over several hundred meters squared, so... likely nothing

It does, but it's negligible on the scale that's currently realistic to build

first Tumblr banned porn, then Reddit requires sign-in for 18+ content (I know old UI bypasses that), and now Twitter has become a walled garden as well. Bad times for gooners

Hopefully it'll happen to the .nu domain soon, which has quite literally been colonized by Sweden

Nein.

How does one even get a drone like that 60km behind enemy lines, I thought batteries only last like 30 minutes at best...

Слава Україні!