"$200k bond for Trump—significant and something of an indignity that he has to post something," former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Harry Litman said.
That was probably true before he became President but I doubt it is anymore. He spent his entire term lining his pockets with as much taxpayer money as possible... And that's not even taking into account the fact that he's been campaigning this entire time to fund his legal defense against the numerous criminal and civil cases against him.
I keep seeing this, so I wanted to clear up some details:
Bail isn’t a penalty, it is an incentive to return for trial (to get your money back). Bail was waived for Trump in previous cases because not only is he constantly followed by Secret Service, he is a high profile person who won’t be able to hide for long anywhere in the world.
Bail is typically a tenth (or less) of what Trump was given for even some violent felonies.
You must pay the entire amount to be released on bail, unless you get a bail bond.
A bail bond is when a third party agrees to pay the bail amount if you do not show up for trial. The 10% frequently cited is a fee to the bail bondsman for taking this risk. You still have to provide some kind of collateral to the bondsman to cover the remainder of the bail amount.
You don’t get the 10% back. If you have the cash to cover bail, it makes sense to use it because then you can get it all back.
Trump getting a bail bond would be a public admission that he doesn’t have the cash. He’ll find the cash.
I suspect it's a function of engagement. Trump's edictments are hot, so some will click on anything vaguely related to it. Even reporting on chirping does the trick since people want more of the "story" even though it's not a development.
The steep decline in money available to publishers means that they’re going to cut reporting in favor of paying an intern to copy and paste off of twitter. You end up with twenty different publications summarizing the same AP article with one paragraph, the. a dozen hot takes on twitter by people you’ve never heard of.
And we’re reaching the point where they don’t even need the intern to do it.
It's the 24-hour news cycle and the drive for constant content. Nothing of value just content. They'll tell you the same thing thousands of times. Over and over again drilling it into you. Reporting on he said she said inanity. In Pursuit of an agenda.
The $200,000 bond approved for Donald Trump in the Georgia election interference case is significant as it suggests the former president "cannot be trusted" to surrender to authorities for processing, according to a legal expert.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee approved the amount for the former president on Monday, the first time Trump has been asked to post bond in any of the four criminal cases he is involved in.
Discussing the bond arrangement, former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Harry Litman said that while the amount of money is not an issue for the former president, it is noteworthy that Judge McAfee should take steps to ensure that Trump does hand himself in.
But the bigger provision is the anti tampering condition—he can't do anything to intimidate any co-deft or witness or otherwise obstruct the administration of justice," Litman posted on X, formerly Twitter.
The former president is not allowed to communicate with witnesses or any of the 18 other co-defendants in the case, which includes his former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and his ex-personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, except through his lawyers.
Trump was previously accused of witness intimidation via his Truth Social posts by legal experts after suggesting that former Georgia Lieutenant Governor Geoff Duncan shouldn't testify to a grand jury just prior to the Fulton County indictment being announced.
The original article contains 596 words, the summary contains 226 words. Saved 62%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
"... something of an indignity that he has to post something"
LAWL.. that a former PRESIDENT has to post BOND because he's considered at risk of fleeing the REPUBLIC.. yeah, something of an indignity.. that's exactly what Washington would have said..
on racketeering charges no less.. while still in office.. against a state..
if you trusted him your head is on upside down AND backwards.. get a friend or a priest to knock it off for you, so you can put it back on straight..
Then again, this is trump and you know he's dumb as a rock and always ready to put up a show.
Then again, please please don't show up. I want to watch a SWAT team kick in his door and drag him out screaming "I thought this was America! MAGAFLGHH" and then a cop puts a knee in his neck. I know, will never happen, bit wouldn't that be fun for a change
The article is deceitful, because it's quoting former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Harry Litman. So it's a former prosecutor saying the $200k bond means Trump cannot be trusted, not the courts saying that.
When shit gets too hot, he is one plane ride away from fleeing to Russia.
Right now his lawyers can just been on fighting all his legal problems in the hopes that he will get elected and will try to find some way to wipe the slate clean. Something. But if he is legitimately facing actual incarceration, there is no doubt he is leaving the country. Absolutely zero doubt about ti.
And we will just let him do it, rather than impound his plane or throw him in jail as a flight risk. And that's because Democrats are too timid to be as forceful as they should be.