What are your favorite news sources?

AP, BBC and NPR

NPR is my go-to for soft spoken documentary pieces about uncomfortable topics.

Mostly the wire services (Reuters, AP).

I tend to follow journalists more than the publications themselves. That said my usual go-to's would be BBC World, CBC, Al-Jazeera, and AP.

I want to like Al Jazeera, but they are owned by the Qatar government so I am dubious of them.
- Its good to be dubious. Its also good to include them to get a different bias into the mix. Only consuming media of the same bias will leave you ignorant without you knowing it, thats the believe I've come to adopt.
  
  And you only realize which part of the bias is shared across a lot of media when you read media from outside the bubble. And a lot are within the bubble. To quote wikipedia:
  
  progressively fewer individuals or organizations control increasing shares of the mass media.
  
  There is enough reason to be dubious about all mass media. BBC is founded and owned by the UK government and many other publications by a billionaire family.
  
  Previously I had thought media literacy was about chosing "reliable" sources but nowadays I believe its more about reading many of different biases and being dubious of all until their bias emerges.
  
  IDK if that resonates with you at all or not. But I can also recommend Noam Chomskys "Manufacturing Consent", its a classic ofc.
- Yes, but you know what their biases are and can take that into account. Do you know what the biases are for the privately owned news sources? Sometimes sure, but it isn't always as clear.

Theres this tiktok account that reports using the ai voice of the newscaster fish from spongebob. Surprisingly intresting news from that.

Ah yes, @bikini.bottom.news!

NPR, AP, an Reuters are already mentioned. For leftist/left leaning sources I like Jacobin, truth out, it's going down, Jewish currents, current affairs, the intercept, democracy now, mintpress news (more Canadian centered), and left voice

The Onion. No need for further explanation.

Me too. I seriously go to The Onion for news. I started doing it as a joke, but then realized what people want to laugh about gave a much more honest picture of what people actually cared about on a daily basis. I live outside the USA so it's not otherwise obvious to me. It truly is America's Finest News Source.

The court jester is the only one allowed to tell the truth about the king, I guess.

The Economist

Not for breaking news perhaps, but for in-depth analysis and critical commentary the Economist is in a class of it's own. It's the only news magazine I subscribe to. They don't dumb down stories, they treat their readers as adults and they scrupulously avoid sensationalism. The standard of written English is exceptional, (something for which it is renowned). And I love the humor in some of the regular columns. The whole magazine is a joy to read from Letters to Obituaries. 10/10
- It is also important because, while there is bias against Russia, the newspaper generally does a good job reporting on taking a step back from the issue to provide something more nuanced than typical news sources.
  
  It also will write articles defending welfare spending if it finds a reason to do so, which it often finds.

NPR

PBS

BBC

Reuters

AP

(My state owned broadcaster RTÉ)

Other news sources are fine, but I prefer to double check these if I am uncertain.

Also Democracy Now! Is pretty good too.

Which app do you use to follow that many source?
- I use RSS readers. Specifically Feeder on Android and QuiteRSS on laptop/desktop
off topic: do you watch the virgin media channels since you're irish
- I would occasionally watch them if I'm flicking through channels etc, but they wouldn't be my go to source.

AOL news. Yes, it still exists.

But… why?

Man.. used to be twitter and I don’t have a replacement yet. You could just follow all the journalists you wanted over there it was great. But now I’m migrating away from the app.

I used Twitter too to check for the most up to date local news, but on the website the posts are not sorted chronologically anymore, so it is absolutely useless now
- Yeah that’s a dumb change that never fully impacted me because of the sheer time I spent on twitter. Plus, the following feed is chronological so that still worked for the news I chose to follow.

One day I just decided news didn't exist and stopped reading any of it. Last I checked it was 1992 and they invented moon pies. What a time to be alive.

DW News, AP, Reuters, BBC (which I sometimes feel doesn't belong in this list).

BBC

Most often I'll see an article, and then google the topic to find a better place to read about it.

AP & Reuters are pretty good usually

CBC (Canadian public broadcaster) for Canadian stuff. They're pretty reliable and trustworthy while many other broadcasters are owned by an oligopoly of of telecom companies (which surprise, shy away from topics of competition and abuse by the parent companies). I also check out small small local independent places.

Also specific healthcare journals and organizations because I'm involved in that area.

Associated Press. Everyone else just takes their reports and puts their spin on it.

That’s only really true for run of the mill stories. News outlets do their own reporting all the time

Morning Brew. Their daily emails give me just the right amount of news. Most of the major stories in a concise format. I usually hate emails so I was skeptical when setting this up, but I do like it

Ground News. I see all of the same breaking news as anyone else who is tuned into a specific channel, but I can easily compare how the story is being spun.

It’s also nice because I can link the story to anyone, no matter their affiliation, without implicitly endorsing one outlet’s take on what to think about it.

Ground news.

tl;dr news and ground news sometimes i find instresting topics on google discover also i mostly find about data breaches by mental outlaw + lemmy may have instresting news