“Ventoy” responds to blobs concern on GitHub with ChatGPT nonsense from a newly-created Lemmy account after sole maintainer’s vacation to China
“Ventoy” responds to blobs concern on GitHub with ChatGPT nonsense from a newly-created Lemmy account after sole maintainer’s vacation to China
What happened? Due to the recent XZ-Utils drama I checked the code and I'm appalled. There are more BLOBS than source code. https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/tree/3f65f0ef03e4aebcd14f233ca808a4f8946...
![[issue]: Remove BLOBs from the source tree · Issue #2795 · ventoy/Ventoy](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/6cf4f4d5-5452-457d-9645-b778a443f876.png?format=webp&thumbnail=256)
Ventoy is a tool to make a USB with multiple ISOs bootable, letting you select which ISO to use on boot. Another newly-created account claims to be the dev's friend and translator and has received no contact from the maintainer.
Nobody knows who responded here. Don't spread rumors.
I thought it was clear from the details that it was suspicious. Edited.
Things are suspicious but you still spread gossip and maybe lies.
My name is Linus torvalds and this is why I TempleOS...
My name is TempleOS and this is why I Linus Torvalds
so ive deep dived into as much information as i can find. the TLDR is the main dev LongPanda supposedly went on a vacation to china (most likely his home country?) to which there is conflicting information on his return. one path is he make a lemmy account 9hours ago and made a message that doesn't describe the blob and sound like a gpt response. to which his "irl friend made an account 3 hours ago to comment that he hasnt heard from LongPanda in months. both were removed from lemmy.ml because of suspected impersonation. the other side of the coin is the LongPanda is still gone and hasn't addressed the blobs. after looking thought the documentation, you can build from source. in the instructions it says "5. Binaries
There some binaries in Ventoy install package. These files are downloaded from other open source project's website, such as busybox."
i am not a programer but in the source build it lists the blobs and were there from supposedly from other FOSS projects with sha256's. so theoretically you should be able to verify the blobs, with the sha256.
https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/blob/master/DOC/BuildVentoyFromSource.txt
Imho it will be much easier to replace blobs with verifiably correct blobs or add the source to build them than to retroactively find the original builds from whence they came.
Searching for some of those binaries looks like it would require comparing the hash against a large set of candidates which would need to first be unpacked from releases (fedora mostly???) and hashed unless the hashes already exist somewhere.
I like Ventoy, it's handy but I don't think it's indispensable so probably what I'll do is go back to using Etcher (which is open source AFAIK) until this resolves itself one way or another. I assume either the dev will respond properly with an explanation and everything will be fine, or someone will get fed up enough to fork it. I feel like it's probably nothing nefarious, but it doesn't really hurt to be overly cautious in this case IMO.
I understand the concern raised, but unless I'm reading this wrong there is an assumption that Ventoy may be doing something untoward, but I'm not sure how at this level. It can't inject anything into the ISO files at rest without bricking then, and I don't know if an OS that doesn't verify it's own image before booting.
Just sounds like super lazy project administration. Maybe I'm missing something?
- Around April, there was this big thing where a maintainer for XZ Compression included an SSH backdoor in binaries that were only built on release. If a freaking piece of compression software can backdoor SSH, who knows what else is possible.
- The response to the blob concern is nonsensical, made without their previously-known accounts, and coincides with someone's claim that they are a close friend and was on vacation to China, the country where the XZ maintainer was from.
The xz issue is something totally different though. That was a software library running and executing against flat files. I'm just not sure there's a way to alter an ISO image before boot, undetected in the case of Ventoy.
If the goal is to alter files to provide access to something, this must be some sort of ingenious way that bypasses checksums, and targets something universal, which doesn't seem quite possible in the case of a substitute bootloader.
It can’t inject anything into the ISO files at rest without bricking then, and I don’t know if an OS that doesn’t verify it’s own image before booting.
As far as I can tell, this is not talking about ISOs installed using Ventoy, but precompiled blobs of things like Busybox that are included in the Ventoy install package. It's an important distinction. The developer could bundle a tampered blob, include in the documentation the checksum that matches that blob, and then if someone checks with the upstream project and calls them out, say something along the lines of, "Oh, they must have withdrawn that release," and replace it with an untampered blob. If they don't fight to preserve the tampered blob, they might even get away with it.
Didn't something similar just happen with RustDesk? ChatGPT response from author in an hours old account.
On second sight, that specific response seems like a troll
I banned that one now too.
Some common threads I'm seeing with these troll accounts:
- lemmings.world
- new account
- claim to be or know the creators
- make claims about the insecurity of an open source app
- blame china in some way
Oh hell naw, I was rooting for rustdesk...
Interesting context to bring up Lemmy
Edit: from the thread, it's pretty clear those people were not the creator?
I'm not saying it was aliens, but it was aliens.
ancient aliens
I heard people raving about ventoy, i checked it out online, but blobs and chinese maintainer made it seem fishy. Even if a maintainer was legit it only takes CCP thteatening their family to get a backdoor inserted
This is ridiculous. You don't trust "Chinese maintainers" ("even if legit" lol), because the "CCP" might threaten "their family to get a backdoor inserted".
Absolutely unhinged level of fantasy in the context of this project. A nation of 1.4 billion people and you don't trust anyone there to write software? You know they made your phone and pretty much everything else right? Also, the idea that "the CCP" is somehow uniquely (among governments) willing and able to coerce or commission backdoors in software is a feverishly deluded attitude.
Propaganda has put a backdoor in your brain.
We have chinese police here in Vancouver (edit Non Canadian force), if residents speak badly about CCP these "Police" show up at the door and try to coherce them back to mainland. I'm not regurgitating the articles, my friend living in vancouver had them show up. I'm not trusting blobs.
Oh, if it's not lemmy.ca and their daily quota of racism...
hey let's not attribute racism to canadians in an act of ethnicism
Hang on, it's racist to call out totalitarian dictatorships that put muslims in concentration camps and have secret police in other countries to enforce their draconian laws abroad on other sovereign state's soil?
Fuck that, the chinese government is sketchy as hell, and so are you for trying to downplay the distrust said government has earned quite well as "racism." Do you work directly for them or is it more of a 3rd party contractor situation?