It's easier to see what it is once you see the whole scenery. It's a really clever framing, 10/10
211 0 ReplyAlso colour saturation put to the max.
39 5 ReplyNot necessarily, just different lighting. OP looks like it was taken with low-angle full sunlight.
22 0 Reply
Oh, so that's a textured wall, and not the horizon/sky
20 0 Reply
I like this style, just don't know what it's called.
100 0 ReplyI can't speak for the photography style, but that style of using walls of ice in a composition is called "impossible in 30 years"
72 9 ReplyHaha! Oh, now I’m sad. :(
16 0 ReplyThat's very optimistic of you to think humans will be around to have names for such things in 30 years.
3 1 Reply
Checkers
10 0 ReplyPete.
2 0 ReplyA tetraptych or pseudo-tetraptych maybe? Closest concept I can think of.
2 0 ReplyYou just invented it. You get to name it. What would you like to call it?
2 0 ReplyA Croatian empanada!
10 1 ReplyIt's had a dedicated subreddit for like five years
2 0 ReplyJefferson Starships!
1 0 Reply
The upper right quadrant is a terracotta wall that goes right up to the water. Below that in the photo is the reflexion of the wall. The left half is just normal water with no reflexion.
38 0 ReplyIt's a really interesting composition. I'm not a fan of these kinds of things being called "unaltered"/"unedited", because after a bit of searching I can't find any evidence of that. But it certainly is not a composite.
If it's shot on film, it's possible the saturation is natural, but I can't find metadata anywhere.
29 4 Replywas anyone else able to see the pic for what it is and then left confused looking for why it’s supposed to be confusing
5 1 ReplyHow????
5 1 ReplyThe bottom right is a reflection on the water of the wall at the top right.
9 0 ReplyYou must bend the spoon.
5 0 ReplyMan-made structure in the top right
1 0 ReplyAaaaaaah ok
1 0 Reply
Oh no.
2 0 Replyunaltered
🤔🤥
3 7 ReplyYep. It's literally cropped from the original and impossible to argue it's unaltered
1 0 Reply