Ohio GOP Senator Says 'Civil War' Needed If Trump Loses.
Ohio GOP Senator Says 'Civil War' Needed If Trump Loses.
"Inciting violence over an election that hasn't even occurred yet is irresponsible and undemocratic," said the Ohio Senate Democrats.
You're viewing a single thread.
Suggesting that a war should be waged against the democratically-elected government of the United States seems... Well, it seems kinda treason-y to me. Just a smidge.
394 0 ReplyHey now, treason is very specifically defined in the constitution. Oh and yeah, that’s the constitutional definition. This is treason.
235 0 ReplyTo be fair, we have been very lenient with traitors lately. To the surprise of no one, treason becomes increasingly popular.
This is why we should have met treason aggressively and swiftly from the beginning.
119 0 ReplySCOTUS allows treason if it's an official act peculiar only to Trump.
61 0 ReplyRepublicans can have a little treason. As a treat.
16 0 ReplyYou've heard of first treason, but what about second treason?
9 0 ReplyWhat’s treasons, precious?
2 0 Reply
Americans have been giving these folks too much rope. When will they start using the rope?
8 0 ReplyPerhaps Biden's "official" act is rope-a-dope.
2 0 ReplyShould have done it his first month in office.
Trials for the January 6th crew? Should have been immediate, not taking 4+ years.
1 0 Reply
We've been very lenient with traitors since 1865.
34 0 ReplyObligatory FUCK ANDREW JOHNSON.
8 0 Reply
To be fair, we have been very lenient with traitors lately.
Lately? We have been lenient since the last civil war!
22 0 Reply
Hey treason is when Democrats do anything I don't like which means anything
14 0 Reply
Its only real treason if it comes from the Treasony region of France. Otherwise its just called being a rebel.
36 1 ReplyThe Champagne virus is elusive.
7 0 Replybubbling rebel
2 0 Reply
I miss when that mattered....
20 0 ReplyIsn’t this sedition, not treason?
12 0 ReplyTechnically yes, but it's really just semantics and treason sounds sexier.
4 0 Reply
Yeah this kinda does seem like it might cross the line and be actionable
11 0 ReplyDoing the definition of treason is AT LEAST treason-adjacent!
1 0 ReplyBut you need either that person or two witnesses to admit to it in a court in order to convict.
1 0 Reply