You're viewing a single thread.
Splattering lives is okay,but shattering such windows is the promotion of violence? Honestly? 🔨
In capitalist US, property is more valuable than human life.
Remember: You can take lives to protect property, you cannot damage property to protect lives.
Who told you that?
Rittenhouse
He was damaging property to protect lives?
His stated purpose of being there and taking his gun was to protect property (by taking lives if necessary) from people who were damaging property in order to protect lives (the BLM protests).
by taking lives if necessary
That's an aside you're imbuing, he never said the above.
Why did he have a gun? You don't take a gun with you unless you're ready to use it. You don't use a gun unless you're ready to kill whatever you are pointing it at.
Otherwise you're a complete fucking idiot that should have never been allowed around a gun in the first place.Why did he have a gun?
Demonstrably, to protect himself from an attacker.
You don’t take a gun with you unless you’re ready to use it.
And he demonstrated that he was ready to use it to protect himself. What's your point?
You don’t use a gun unless you’re ready to kill whatever you are pointing it at.
He didn't point it at or use it on anyone except those who were literally in the act of trying to kill him.
What's your point, exactly?
Huh. I don't really consider Kyle Rittenhouse a valid source of my moral philosophy, so I've never heard his manifesto before.
Considering the lack of consequences for his actions, and that he's been paraded around since by the party that won the election, it shows the moral philosophy of the country and its legal system.
His "actions" were nothing but him stopping people who were in the act of trying to murder him unprovoked.
Despite all of the ridiculous politicization of the events in Kenosha that day, that is the fact of the matter. His life was directly threatened for no reason, he tried to flee, was eventually cornered, and used his weapon to stop the aggressor from making good on his threat.
It is not immoral or illegal to use lethal force to protect your life from an imminent threat.
-
why was he there in the first place? Inserting yourself into a dangerous situation so that you have an excuse to shoot someone in "self defense" is vigilantism.
-
why was he invited to speak at political events after the fact? Lots of people have their "life threatened for no reason" and exercise their right to self defense, none of them have been invited to speak at political events. What was differnt about Rittenhouse's situation that made him a good candidate to give speeches?
-
At best it only shows the moral philosophy of the plurality of people who bothered to vote, and your defeatism is tantamount to enabling their attitude.
One guy had an idea of the relationship between property and (black) lives and got into a fight which ended in a death and was acquitted for murder.
Do you think that because Casey Anthony was acquitted, America thinks killing kids is no biggie? What if a few people signal boosted her to rabble rouse their base?
It's a handful of morons who are now disproportionately at the helm. They don't speak for you or me.
Ah, so that's why they try to reestablish slavery. Make people property again to protect them. Got it!
In fairness, my dogs are considered "property" and I value both of them far more than the human who put this on their vehicle.
Thats just called familial priorities tho. Doggo is fam.
Property is more valuable than human life everywhere in the world. For example, two million children die from hunger each year. 7$ will protect a child from malaria for a season. I could save so many lives by selling everything I own and donating it to charity, and yet I don't. And neither do you, or most of the rest of the world.
Life has value. Each of us estimates our own life to be invaluable, but the life of those farther and farther away has less and less value for us. Not because it's not actually worth less, but because we're tribal beings. We care about ourselves first, then our tribe, then if we have any extra resources we might care about other tribes too.
But yeah, what I'm saying is I'd let the entirety of lemmy die for a crisp 1$ note and I'd lose no sleep about it, y'all were born in the wrong tribe.
You're a bad person and you should stop pretending your selfish disposition is natural and immutable simply because you've noticed others are too. There are reasons people behave the way they do and those reasons can change.
It's some weird sort of sarcasm/projection. He does not really mean it, I have been there, been edgy before...
Property is more valuable than human life everywhere in the world.
No not really. There are lots of places where it wont fly in court when you kill someone to protect your property. In the US it does, all the time. They frame it differently and cry self defense or something, but we all know what actually happens.
Wow, you'd really let me die for $1?
I'd let myself die for $1 if it was painless and quick.
Sounds cheap enough.I'm sorry man. That's unfortunate, and I have to hope my life is never in your hands. I hope you understand why.
Uncritical acceptance of power structures as natural extensions of humanity. Sometimes this place really is Reddit.
The mod might be referring to the sticker itself. "Don't post bumper stickers that promote violence."
Then the mod should have posted the comment as it's own comment and pinned it to the top.