Is this genuine? Like is the unit circle really fucking you up that bad?
35 0 ReplyI'm pretty dumb, so I don't understand this one.
31 0 ReplyPythagorean theorem.
Although, don't solve this or else Pythagoras might throw you off of a boat
15 2 ReplyPretty sure this is Pythagorean Identity, theorem is a²+b²=c²
16 0 Reply
Probably that trigonometry is the highest math the average person will take?
3 0 ReplyI got to calculus 2 and proceeded to forget everything through algebra II once I took a break from math for a semester.
5 0 Reply
You leave my unit circle alone!
21 0 ReplyWhy?
18 0 ReplySOH CAH TOA
10 1 ReplyAh, sohcahtoa. Not to be confused with
23 0 ReplyPlease elaborate.
9 0 Reply
Believe this was featured in a paper that recently used trig to prove the Pythagorean theorem (previously thought to be a circular definition). I think some highschoolers cracked it as part of a mathematics challenge or something.
13 0 ReplySomeone needs to turn this into loss
6 2 ReplyWhy is it 1
3 0 ReplyIt was freely chosen for simplicity.
If you choose another R, the other sides (x and y) become R*cos(th) and R*sin(th)
I don't understand what is harmful about the unity circle either.
25 0 ReplyAny circle could have its radius technically be 1, as long as you set the units of measurement so that 1 equals the radius of the circle.
12 0 Replyunits? what are those? I never use units, or pay attention to capitals. pure math ftw, baby!
spoiler
Rapidly hides from the science professors
2 0 Reply
Because it's a unit circle.
6 0 Replyfor the same reason that rulers start with 1, it would be utterly pointless to use anything else.
4 3 ReplyYour ruler starts with 1? How do you measure stuff between 0 and 1?
6 0 Reply
Took me a minute to notice, but it was worth it
3 5 ReplyNotice what??
You can use the spoiler tag
No spoiler
6 0 ReplyNotice what, exactly. I still don't get it.
5 0 ReplyTake a look again, it's still there
2 6 Reply