I know we shouldn't body shame but, bruh... That man stole his feet from a David Cronenberg movie set.
Why would we assume this is a man? /s, and ignoring man vs. male-assigned-at-birth or whatever, just trying to make that joke about a woman with really hairy legs! đ
My real faux pas, especially given the photographic evidence to the contrary, was to assume the OP was human at all. I will strive to do better in the future.
Actual duck feet. Shoes that fit him don't exist.
This is usually what happens when you don't wear shoes. "Fashionable" shoes deform your feet and crush them up a bunch. It's why old people in rich countries have so many foot issues, especially bunions. Toes are naturally supposed to be spread out a bunch and radiate outwards, but historical western fashion trends were towards pointy shoes/feet, so that's what's the norm now.
There exist shoes that don't deform your feet though. Like another reply said, barefoot shoes are one. Those are hardly everyday shoes though, you'll have to search a lot harder (and spend a lot more money) to find "natural" foot-shaped daily drivers
He could get some bearfoot shoes.
Why isn't there any grout in between those tiles? I sure hope they are sitting on concrete.
Those look like linoleum tiles, peel and stick type
That would make sense, I assumed they were ceramic but looking at the gap next to his right flipper, they look too thin.
Those toes are definitely very interesting. This HAS to be against r/notinteresting's rules.
Nubs
That's actually pretty funny
Damn.
Those would get him locked up in Waterworld.
Dudes got Kuato hands for feet
Dudes got Kuato hands for feet
LUL! Incredible reference!
I have counted the toes so many times to confirm 5 on each, I donât know why it looks like more
For free?
I have those exact same tiles in my kitchen. Previous owners thought they looked nice. They do not.
Those feet look like sid from ice age
