Inherent to any discussion of "is X good/bad for the environment?", there's always the matter of accounting: to what or whom -- and when -- do environmental benefits/impacts accrue? And there's no general answer to that, which is why multiple reasonable people in a room can independently conclude that the solutions to climate change can be any of: personal responsibility and personal consumption taxes, the downfall of capitalism, public policy to distort market forces, laissez faire and light-touch regulation, domestic manufacturing, offshore mining, or even all of the above simultaneously.
Unless there is agreement on how the climate impacts are counted and totaled up, you'll get 11 answers from 10 people. I think the point of this video is: 1) in proportion to either the typical Western consumer or the average human anywhere on earth, the embodied carbon footprint from manufacturing of an ebike is low, and 2) the propensity to displace other modes of transport is where ebikes can flex their environmental credentials.
Some may not agree that displacement is a net positive, arguing that if an ebike works so well for someone that they sell their car, then that car will be driven by someone else and now there's an extra ebike in this world. I don't agree with such simplistic logic or its conclusion.
But for people that do see displacement as a valid environment net-benefit, then I hope they'll see that ebikes are very effective at that. Since ebikes still use lithium batteries, that'll continue to be a point of contention, but given the typically fossil-fuel alternative, we could do much, much worse for the environment.
Certainly worse than a regular pedal bike.
The only cycling I do is my commute, it's ten miles each way on hilly roads. I'm not 21 anymore and I absolutely wouldn't be cycling it without an ebike. This saves 100 miles of driving every week.
Yh, it's worse than a regular bike but you shouldn't let good be the enemy of perfect.
I'm not saying e-bikes are bad. Just clarifying that they're not a zero impact bike v. a pedal bicycle.
Funny that you say that. Check min 4:40 - https://youtu.be/HW5b8_KBtT8?si=kWTIiAzLzRaKve6b&t=280
At the outset and comparing total emissions, yes. (E-bike = Regular bike parts + motor, battery, controller after all) Comparing on an emissions per kilometre basis, the research referenced in the video suggests no.
I feel like some need for the electric part depends on how in-shape you are as well as your trip conditions. I started getting in-shape enough to think about it, then my local trail closed and now I am probably back to where I was. My bike is also only 250w so it isn't much of an ebike.
Well that, and I'd want a similar size (or smaller) bike, such as a minivelo. Not really a thing where I'm at and seems to be a cost premium. Unless maybe I could get one used somehow. Though I'm also not in a city, so it probably makes less sense than for other people.
