World News @lemmy.world Rapidcreek @lemmy.world 10mo ago

NATO to Buy 1,000 Patriot Missiles in Face of Russia Threat

www.thedefensepost.com NATO to Buy 1,000 Patriot Missiles in Face of Russia Threat

NATO members in Europe have signed a contract for up to 1,000 Patriot missiles to bolster air defenses in the face of the threat from Russia.

35 comments

I know Patriot missiles are relevant to traditional airframes... But aren't they completely irrelevant when it comes to drones? I'm pretty sure each missile costs at least 1000x the price of what it's most likely to be aimed at.

Edit: at four million a missile it's closer to 10000 or 100000x
- Patriots are part of a layered air defense system that focuses on more valuable targets, whereas smaller air defense systems and units intercept UAVs.
  
  Example
- These aren't for the small disposable drones. They're for other missles and large aircraft. For the missles in particular, you should also factor in the potential cost of the damage they'll cause if not intercepted.
- 4 000 000 a missile, 100 000x times more expensive than a military drone? what military drone costs $40?
  
  I don't know what models are in use today, but a Bayraktar TB2 costs 4 million.
  
  The Ukrainians and houthis are having successful attacks with consumer drones that have hand grenades or ieds taped to them. You don’t need a “military grade” drone to fly an explosive where it shouldn’t be
  
  Both Russia and Ukraine are heavily reliant on consumer drones from the likes of DJI. Those run in the 1000-4000 dollar range.
Great news for the industrial militar complex.
Does Russia even have 1000 operational aircraft at this point?
- I think it's more about how wide the area to defend is.
  
  Yeah, but I wanted to make a joke at the RuAF's expense.
- They are also used against hypersonic missiles the Russians have (kinzal etc.) and ballistics like s300 and s400.
  
  You might want to put the hypersonic part in quotes, they're basically just really expensive ballistic missiles that fly slightly faster. Considering their price tag, Russia would have probably been better off never developing them anyways
  
  The S-300 and S-400 are anti-aircraft missile systems.
  
  Missile on missile violence?
- Defending everywhere requires more units than attacking anywhere.
- Yeah they are totally losing
Kinda feels like we should add a 0 to that, given the jiggery-pokery that China is also getting up to these days. I’m sure Taiwan wouldn’t mind a few shipments of the anti-ballistic variants.
- 10,000 missile x 4 million dollars = 4 billion dollars. Maybe this is why I stopped checking how expensive war is, it makes it more depressing when we talk numbers.
  
  1.5x Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity projects or 160 million flu shots.
  
  Nope, it's 40 billion dollars, 4 billion as it stands rn.
- Taiwan has seven Patriot batteries. For reference, Ukraine initially got two Patriots, and a third one in December. They have to cover a lot more territory than Taiwan, but they've basically shut down Russian missile attacks. Including Russia's hypersonic missile, which is a very important datapoint for military planners to know.

35 comments