Why would'nt this work?
Why would'nt this work?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b949e/b949e6399d16825af6364feb65768991f8d93f63" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9092/a9092e2fe7016fdcea73797e2ceffa82291ec233" alt=""
It can look dumb, but I always had this question as a kid, what physical principles would prevent this?
You're viewing a single thread.
The problem is that when you push an object, the push happens at the speed of sound in that object. It's very fast but not anywhere near the speed of light. If you tapped one end of the stick, you would hear it on the moon after the wave had traveled the distance.
For example, the speed of sound in wood is around 3,300 m/s so 384,400/3,300 ~= 32.36 hours to see the pole move on the moon after you tap it on earth.
238 1 ReplyYour math is off. The Moon is about 384,400 KILOmeters from the Earth, not meters. So 116,485 seconds, or a bit over 32 hours.
84 0 ReplyOh right. I'll edit my comment
28 0 Reply
I swear I've seen a video of someone timing the speed of pushing a very long pole to prove this very thing. If I can find it I'll post it here.
*Found it! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqhXsEgLMJ0 I can't speak to the rigorousness of the experiment, but I remember finding it enlightening.
69 0 ReplyAlphaPhoenix is definitely one of the best scientists on YouTube, that video is good.
9 0 ReplyCool vid, thanks for sharing
7 0 Reply
Damn, so that means no FTL communication for now... ๐
38 1 ReplyHear me out... What about a metal stick?
31 1 ReplyMetal is a lot heavier than wood. You'd never be able to lift it to the moon.
22 0 ReplyBut can you lift it from the moon? Gravity is a lot lower there.
17 0 ReplyLarge if factual
14 0 Reply
You should make it out of feathers. Steel is heavier than feathers.
8 0 ReplyNASA: "Hold my beaker."
7 0 ReplyWhat if you had a crane?
7 0 ReplyOr a duck.
11 0 ReplyOr hope
3 0 Reply
๐ค
5 0 Reply
For now
13 0 Reply13 hours later Now?
1 0 ReplyHold on, let me check. I don't think so
1 0 Reply
Wow, TIL that the speed of sound has this equivalence
6 0 ReplyIt's also why rocket nozzles can't be infinitely thin :)
3 0 ReplyI don't get it. Care to explain?
2 0 Reply
Does that mean the theoretical speed limit for a jet aircraft is how fast sound propagates through the airframe?
2 0 ReplyNo, a jet aircraft moves by pushing air behind it, the theoretical limit would have to be somehow related to that
6 0 ReplyXKCD has alot of thought experiments like this.
2 0 ReplyThe theoretical limit could be related to either of those things; it just depends which is lower.
(It's almost certainly the one you mentioned.)
1 0 Reply