You're viewing a single thread.
Cuz they are trees
19 0 ReplyTechnically you’re not wrong. Mainly because there’s no agreed upon technical definition of what does or doesn’t constitute a tree.
35 1 Replythe definition of tree is literally just something that looks like a tree: a woody trunk with branches.
6 0 ReplyTIL that trees are the same as vegetables and weeds, arbitrary cultural groupings. We should make an arbitrary cultural group name for arbitrary cultural grouped things!
So far the group is: -Trees -Vegetables -Weeds -Pets -Continents -The culinary use of fruit
10 0 ReplyI feel like sports could fit into that pretty well.
5 0 ReplyFish
3 0 ReplyBerries, insects
1 0 ReplyI think both of those have rigid scientific definitions.
2 0 ReplyOh yeah. I thought you meant how they are used culturally. Because we have many nok-berries with berry in their name.
2 0 Reply
Most won't consider it a tree but who am I to judge
4 0 ReplyMost are wrong then. If you can make toothpicks out of it, it's a tree.
6 2 ReplyYou can make toothpicks out of anything if you're willing to find a hard bit in it that can be sharpened or whittled.
Holds up a chicken. Behold! A tree!
15 0 Replybones are trees? o_o
3 0 ReplySo... Everything is a tree? 🤔
3 0 Reply