Skip Navigation
InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)SZ
Szyler @lemmy.world
Posts 0
Comments 76
Let the man enjoy his boats
  • It's not wanting a label, it's struggling to fit in and being tired of it. Finding people like yourself is how you fit in, and if you fit with some people and they have a label, you checkup on it yourself and find an explanation of why you didn't fit in in the first place.

    If you feel you fit in without knowing who you might fit in with, that is great, and you don't need to have a label. But some people find it easier to find like minded people if they match labeles.

  • This is a bigger culture shock than the metric vs imperial system to me.
  • How many floors do you count in a two storey house? Do you have ground + 1 floor, or so you have a house with a floor in top of the ground and a floor up the stairs? If you have two floors, you can one the first and the other "second floor"

  • Learning to interrupt gracefully is a skill
  • I haven't thought about it like that before. When I told my ex I want to leave a party she would say "we're leaving" and keep talking for 20 minutes. I'm like "wtf? We said we're leaving, why aren't we leaving". She used to say "slowly leaving". And it always frustrated me. As there is no slowly leaving. There's leaving and there's not leaving.

  • What's a phrase you hear a lot, but disagree with?
  • This is also an autistic thing of being more logical in reasoning.

    I only got diagnosed at age 30, and had some bad relationships due to me wanting truth and them feeling personally attacked by my questions.

    Could be why it took you some time to realise, as most neurotypical people think in past experience for reasoning. https://psychcentral.com/autism/why-people-with-autism-are-more-logical#autism-and-logical-thinking

  • Climate expert says 2/3rds of humans are under an effective 'death sentence'
  • Humans can still be a cancer without killing them all. We can CURE cancer cells (maybe in the future). We can MANAGE cancer cells, stopping their destructive appetite for more and more energy (uncontrolled capitalism). Opting for killing the worst of them, but not all + the host. We can PREVENT spread of cancer to other cells (countries), stopping the opportunity of the cancer to live in the future. Eventually the cancer will die out a natural death.

    Cancerous might be a hyperbole of our built in greed though. Humankind is a pest on the planet though. We consume too much and adapt our surroundings to us, not us adapting to our surroundings.