Idk but I think Hezbollah has promised to bomb US military bases if they get involved.

But if they want the rapture to come why don’t they support “sexual perversions” that will also become widespread before the endtimes? I think I just made an argument for Christian nationalists to support pink washed Israel.

Yes, the US are OG oppressors, but Israel is on the cutting edge. It is a material fact that Israelis train cops in the US in oppression. New high tech techniques are tested in both places and shared. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/6/12/how-the-us-and-israel-exchange-tactics-in-violence-and-control

They don’t do it for simple sadism, they have Israel test ways to be cruel so their own military can when “necessary” and so they can teach USian pigs how to crush dissent when we inevitably rise up like BLM.

The funny thing is they think the anti-Christ will unify “the holy land” and they’re still for it.

Libs: just don’t do war

Mao: “War can only be abolished through war, and in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun.“

Borshwazee

They knew they weren’t capitalist though, and that their knowledge of capitalism only applied to Europe.

Fair, I wonder why it was canonized as a Marxist thing. I guess it was probably just opposition to bourgeois nationalism was extrapolated to all nationalism by some.

This is why we need Lenin. Back in Marx’s day there may have been one international proletariat, but now there’s imperialism and oppressor nation workers are not the same as oppressed nation workers.

That’s just the stuff in the red deal. I found the Bolivian thing referenced btw. Some more stuff recommended on that podcast was ‘socialism or extinction,’ ‘fresh banana leaves’ (I have a copy), ‘indigenous Paleolithic of the western hemisphere (?),’ and ‘Custer died for your sins’ (classic, but a bit outdated, and I’ve heard criticism of it) among others.

All of them, I’m guessing

I’m pretty sure it wasn’t meant to be too radical. It was meant to draw sunshine and DSA types, and then the further reading it references are supposed to be more radical. That’s what they said on Marx Madness anyway. The further reading being ‘red nation rising,’ ‘our history is the future,’ and the one Bolivian decolonization agreement they mention.

Sartre’s not too bad. He’s an undialectical comrade, and he defended not promoting the notion that gulags were evil. He had some interesting philosophy. Obviously Israel shouldn’t have been supported, but the USSR supported them at the time and it wasn’t as blatant then.

All I’m saying is it’s stupid to actually think “ humanity lives in a perpetual cycle of “fuck-around” and “find-out”.” maybe it was a joke, but I don’t find it funny.

the shared story of America

Indigenous heroes are not and would not want to be part of your colonizer history. It’s more offensive to call them “American” than to not honor them with a holiday.

I don’t think it was offensive, but it also wasn’t funny.

New theory about the whole structure of human history based on like two observations

Idealism much?

That’s not true, they aren’t the worst or capitalism because neoliberalism actually exists. They don’t.

I was saying this recently. For the test of whether you are an anti-imperialist leftist the only real questions need to be “Russia or NATO” and “Israel or Palestine.”