Brittany Watts, 33, was charged after police searched her toilet following her miscarriage in September.
Brittany Watts, 33, was charged after police searched her toilet following her miscarriage in September.
A Black woman in Ohio has been charged with a felony for abuse of a corpse after she miscarried into her toilet, according to a criminal complaint, and reproductive rights experts are warning that it could set a dangerous precedent if she is convicted.
The attorney for Brittany Watts and a campaign organized on her behalf called the charges against her unjust, saying they feared the case could open the door to similar prosecutions and lawsuits over miscarriages nationwide.
Just hours after Watts, 33, was admitted to a hospital for a life-threatening hemorrhage after she miscarried in her bathroom Sep. 22, police removed her toilet from her home and searched it for fetal remains, according to a GoFundMe set up to fund her legal expenses and home repairs.
"Ms. Watts suffered a tragic and dangerous miscarriage that jeopardized her own life. Rather than focusing on healing physically and emotionally, she was arrested and charged with a felony and is fighting for her freedom and reputation," her attorney, Traci Timko, said in a statement.
That's what it took to get to the fetus and remove it. And they're blaming her for not doing it. There she was with a partially retained placenta, in danger of bleeding out, and she had the nerve to leave her toilet intact in order to obtain timely life saving health care.
And don't forget, she'd been to the hospital multiple times and left because she wasn't receiving care...all hospital caregivers and 'legal teams' were too busy trying to figure out if they could legally remove a dead fetus; they wouldn't do what needed to be done. Just left her sitting there while they argued intent of the law versus letter of the law.
"She put the fetus into the toilet." No, she didn't. The fetus was expelled into the toilet, along with bodily waste. She tried to get everything out, but she couldn't.
"She then went about her day." No, she didn't. She went to the hospital. She was bleeding (probably heavily) due to part of the placenta being left attached.
That's just two of the twisted statements the prosecutor has made in order to make this woman look like a heartless SOB.
It's gone too far, and short of removing Republicans from office and justices from the court, I don't know what we can do. They are prosecuting this woman to punish her for miscarrying in an inconvenient place.
It's worth mentioning that just 11 days earlier, had her miscarriage happened at the hospital, it would have been disposed of as medical waste...incinerated. 11 freaking days, and the state is criminalizing her.
This is one of the many reasons that I hate people: "10 days and you're fine, 12 days and you're a murderer". People that follow the law to the number are a scourge on humanity.
If God is omnipotent, omniscient and wholly good, whence evil? If God wills to prevent evil but cannot, then He is not omnipotent. If He can prevent evil but does not, then he is not good. In either case he is not God.
-David Hume
If God is unable to prevent evil, then he is not all-powerful.
If God is not willing to prevent evil, then he is not all-good.
If God is both willing and able to prevent evil, then why does evil exist?
-Epicurus
I like to think that neo-plato stuff is very neat. “God” is essentially good cause he creates and expands, but he doesn’t have a conscientious nor a great design, so in a way God doesn’t really exist as an entity but its existence itself.
Evil in this isn’t a force on its own, it’s merely the failing of a non perfect conscious being (humanity)
all hospital caregivers and 'legal teams' were too busy trying to figure out if they could legally remove a dead fetus
Source on that? Last I read, and funny how all the articles are regurgitating the same exact text a few days later, she checked herself out against medical advice. Twice.
Even the articles we can easily see today repeat that she was offered induced labor and follow up care, an abortion, and she walked away. Twice.
This isn't a case of abortion law gone mad. It's a case of a woman suffering hell and making poor choices.
tl;dr: The Texas case we've all heard about is madness. This one is too, but not over abortion laws. This one is prosecutorial overreach.
Her lawyer, Traci Timko, said Watts sat for eight hours at Mercy Health-St. Joseph's awaiting care on the eve of her pregnancy reaching 22 weeks, before leaving without being treated.
Timko said hospital officials were deliberating over the legalities.
I've got my grandbabies here so I don't have the time to do a big search, but this article quotes her lawyer's statement that at least one visit in which she left AMA, she waited EIGHT hours for help, which she did not receive. (See first quote) I've read another article which I can try to find after the holidays which explained that in her two visits prior to the miscarriage, she was never admitted. She went to the hospital, explained what was going on, received one examination but was NOT admitted. She left after failing to be admitted, which was considered AMA. I'm sure they'd have liked her to sit there another day or two while they continued to fail to admit her, while deliberating over legalities. (See second sentence in the quote)
Even the articles we can easily see today repeat that she was offered induced labor and follow up care, an abortion, and she walked away. Twice.
That is a flat-out untruth. I posted this elsewhere in this thread, but just to be sure you see it:
Every single account I have read says she was in and out of the hospital miscarrying before she finally did at home, and then went back to the hospital afterward, where she was inpatient for days. She left the hospital because she wasn't getting any help; they were all stuck on the new law while her body was unable to expel the fetus quickly. At NO point did they help her to expel it, or offer to do so. That's why she kept going home.
Brittany Watts was still hooked to an IV, sick for almost a week from a potentially fatal miscarriage, when a detective from the Warren Police Department in Ohio stepped into her hospital room. He assured her that she wasn’t in any trouble.
For more than an hour, Detective Nick Carney interviewed Watts, 33, about the details of that morning and the whereabouts of the nearly 22-week-old fetus that was declared nonviable two days earlier. As Watts described miscarrying in her bathroom, a nurse at Mercy Health — St. Joseph Warren Hospital rubbed her shoulders and told her everything would be okay, Watts told The Washington Post in a series of text messages.
Two weeks later, Carney arrested Watts on charges of felony abuse of a corpse for how she handled the remains from her pregnancy. If indicted and found guilty, she faces up to a year in prison along with a fine of up to $2,500, her lawyer said.
To describe Watts’s experience, The Washington Post reviewed police reports, call recordings and more than 600 pages of medical records, interviewed her lawyer, and spoke to Watts via text message.(emphasis mine)
Again, you don't need to make anything up. If you find yourself having to lie, maybe your point is not as worthy as you think it is.
Thank you! I had not seen this anywhere else and it explains much.
I'm not lying, bullshitting or trying to condone abortion law. I simply hadn't seen anything tying this case to law.
God forbid I said that out loud and asked honest questions. I know how to play for upvotes, 11-years on reddit taught me to play users like a fiddle. Thought around here we might discuss things, but of course not, toe the party line or get the fuck out.
Again, thanks for the more in depth material. Your attitude needs fucking work though.
I had not seen this anywhere else and it explains much.
Well, that's another big fat lie, because you've been posting the same horseshit on multiple Brittany Watts articles, refusing to read the articles themselves (which I linked in my last comment and you now claim you've never seen) and carrying on despite others telling you each time you're just flatly wrong:
No, it really doesn't. How many separate threads do others need to wade through your bullshit before it's appropriate to call you out on it?
The links I provided above were from separate Lemmy threads that you participated in, all saying the same thing, repeatedly. I just linked them above from your post history.
That's multiple occasions you had all along to
read the fucking article instead of sealioning for unnecessary additional sources, and
get your fucking facts right, and
stop fucking with commenters who genuinely care about the criminalization of women's healthcare by repeatedly trying to turn related discussions into victim blamefests.
In each instance, commenters corrected you, but you kept spouting your bullshit unhindered.
So tell me, Shalafi, how much of your bullshit do others need to wade through silently before calling you out on your lazy, dishonest, willfully WRONG statements?
I love my attitude, it's the right one to have as human being, and I'll keep enjoying it with pride, thanks.
Facts. The people loudly freaking out at the Supreme Court were right all along. Innocent women will be punished during a traumatic experience that is more than punishment enough. The amount of shame for this and other consequences of Conservative legislation will need to be applied for generations. They have proven to be a lice or bedbug infestation and proper treatment is necessary.
The abortion ban is so broadly enforced that even women who suffer miscarriages and stillbirths can be prosecuted for murder. Now an international court will decide for the first time whether these laws violate the human rights of Salvadoran women.
Hmm... the US is a member of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and signed but never ratified the treaty. Great. The court did actually determine that El Salvador needed to change their policies, which were basically the same as the ones the Christian Fascists have come up with in Texas, Ohio, etc.