For those that were interested in the openSUSE logo contest, the voting wrapped up on Tuesday and the results of this logo contest for new openSUSE branding have been selected.
The main logo choice is fine, no complaints there, but the choices for the others just seem so disjointed from each other (not to mention they basically just chose the old Leap logo again, but in yellow). I really liked the idea of having some sort of unifying design element across the logos to indicate they are all OpenSUSE products. There were some decent concepts with that idea floating around.
I think that one is the only logo with any soul to it. The rest are so flat! I like the old opensuse logo, but I get that it doesn't fit with the rest.
I'm not enormously bothered by the designs themselves; the new logos look fine, although I preferred the old logo.
But what really bothers me is that they've gone with a whole disjointed mess of different designs for each of their sub-projects. Why on earth wouldn't you take this opportunity to design a coherent family of logos? Bizarre missed opportunity.
For those that were interested in the openSUSE logo contest, the voting wrapped up on Tuesday and the results of this logo contest for new openSUSE branding have been selected.
The winning selection for the new openSUSE logo is:
Meanwhile for the new Tumbleweed logo it ended up being a three-way tie:
The new logos for Kalpa, Slowroll, and Leap can also be found via the openSUSE logo contest page.
What do you think of the winning openSUSE logo designs?
Better than the current?
The original article contains 84 words, the summary contains 84 words. Saved 0%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!