Recent testing revealed that Arch Linux, Pop!_OS, and even Nobara Linux, which is maintained by a single developer, all outstripped Windows for the performance crown on Windows-native games. The testing was run at the high-end of quality settings, and Valve's Proton was used to run Windows games on ...
Figure I should give context here. The Steam Deck isn't available on Amazon. The link they give (which is covered in their affiliate nonsense, of course) is to one of those third party resellers.
Morality of those resellers aside, probably not what the article should be linking to as where to buy one.
Silly article. I'm sure you could find a lot more than 3 linux distros that perform similarly.
That's because besides different packaging, these linux distros are all running pretty much the same software. There's likely less than 1% difference between the lot.
While I love good news for Linux gaming, this article is IMO a litre too positive. In the last part, notebookcheck picks the games that Linux distros were best in and presents a biased picture.
But the general message is positive: When games run under Linux, the performance is probably equal or better than with Windows. (And Windows has compatibility problems too).
Yap, ProtonDB give us a good picture, mostly games still have minor issues. But, I like this kind of thing because show potential. If gamedev do they homework, the Linux experience could be better performance.