Jokes on you. I'm a Machinist and that feature on the drawing has an perpendicularity GD&T callout of +- 1deg. In spec is in spec. Ship it!!!
71 0 ReplyI like this positive attitude!
11 0 ReplyIt's 87 degrees
9 0 ReplyNo, no- it's the design engineer who is clearly wrong.
6 0 Reply
Full send
3 0 Reply
As long as it's perfectly 89° it's fine. That's acute angle.
53 0 ReplyIt's very well drawn too, no overshooting on the edges. Looks good to me.
16 0 ReplyIt's 87
9 0 ReplyBarely acute 😳
2 0 Reply
Engineers: Eh, close enough.
29 0 Replyshrugs Same order of magnitude
12 0 Reply
I didn't know 1° difference would be this noticeable. I am very disturbed.
23 0 ReplyIt's noticable cos its 87 degrees not 89.
17 0 Reply
Is it exactly 89°?
24 1 ReplyNo. It's wrong, too. Have a nice day :)
43 0 ReplyI saw this before and if I remember correctly, it's more like 87°.
27 0 ReplyNo. It measures about 87°.
14 0 ReplyWtf?! The fact that OP got it wrong is even more disturbing!
4 0 Reply
Guys it’s actually 90° but the photo is taken on an angle.
20 0 Reply90° isn't any more perfect than 89°. Unless it was supposed to be 90°.
So if you post this exact thing but include the right angle indicator, that would make the image work as intended.
19 0 ReplyIt's supposed to be 89° but is actually 87°. So it qualifies as imperfect.
7 0 ReplyLove it (after I confirmed it to be true via the rotate function in the photo editor)
3 0 ReplyOh shi-
2 0 Reply
More concerned about why you wasted all those colors on this image when two was sufficient?
16 0 ReplyAhhh, I love it when the 89 degree angles are perfectly 89 degrees.
13 0 ReplyI’ll see you in hell
10 1 ReplyYou should have put the little square thing in the corner to indicate a right angle!
6 0 ReplyI can't believe you've done this
5 0 ReplyIt's still perfect since you can just take 32040 of these (= 89*360, ggt is 1 since 89 is prime) and then you will have a full circle. A real shame it would have been when you would have took an irrational amount of degrees since then this calculation would not be possible. There could only be an approximation that makes it impossible in reality to decide if it is right or not but mathematically speaken it would be impossible.
6 1 ReplyI prefer the 91° version
4 0 ReplyWish i didn't see this
4 0 ReplyAnybody who posts images like this have a special position in hell
2 0 Reply
That's not right.
4 0 ReplyAfter reading the title I internally thought: "fuck!"
2 0 ReplyNot a whole circle? BASTARD!
1 0 ReplyYou evil son of a witch.
1 0 ReplyDon't let perfect be the enemy of good.
1 0 ReplyYou monster.
1 0 Reply