Why did people think it was bad that I identified as male online so I could be gay?
I’m comfortable being a woman with my lady parts. I also like to pretend. I told people I was male (transmasc, specifically) so that I could freely experience attraction to just men without having the “straight” label.
Whatever I was, I did NOT want to be straight, so presenting as a trans guy helped me feel better about myself. I could be a gay man. Then, I was a non-binary demiboy (either gay or bi but would only date men).
I felt like a girl in real life. I still do. I didn’t feel dysphoria nor a desire to transition in any way, neither socially nor physically nor anything. It just felt relieving to be a gay trans guy, but that still made me trans even though I didn’t identify as male nor did I ever see myself as male, right?
(I see myself as a woman and always have, I don’t have dysphoria. I identify as a woman who wants a penis. I think I’m moreso attracted to the idea of having male parts than actually seeing myself as a guy, but like I said, it relieved me to be gay and not straight.)
long story short, I’m a woman slightly attracted to the idea of herself being a trans guy or having a penis.
... presenting as a trans guy helped me feel better about myself
I identify as a woman who wants a penis. I think I’m moreso attracted to the idea of having male parts than actually seeing myself as a guy,
It kinda sounds like a bit of dysphoria honestly, unless you just said those things because of guilt. As far as I understand things, wanting to have genitals that typically match the opposite sex usually points to some form of body dysmorphia/euphoria even though you say your current body is fine.
Also, I don't know why the shame from people you're around. It sounds like you're still figuring yourself out and picking a label that is the closest to what you feel like is only something that you can know. Maybe it's not the most accurate but it's not entirely off base.
It sounds like you're at the very least kinda queer and non-heteronomative. Maybe non-binary but that's for you to figure out. Something under the Trans umbrella sounds right to me.
I’m comfortable being a woman with my lady parts. I also like to pretend. I told people I was male (transmasc, specifically) so that I could freely experience attraction to just men without having the “straight” label.
This is the part people will likely get upset about. I'm not pretending when I say I'm a woman. I am trans. Trans folks have been begging for people to respect their identity. It has nothing to do with sexuality, I did not transition in order to be seen as a lesbian woman or as a straight man. I did it to be seen as a woman. The other labels are added on after.
The way you've worded this, it seems like you've taken the trans masc identity and the trust that's been garnered around trans identities and abused it. Your feelings about this are valid, but I really feel you should approach this differently.
If you are feeling uncertain about your gender, then explore that and determine if you truly feel that way. Maybe you are trans masc? Maybe not? If you find yourself struggling with your gender but not rejecting your assigned gender at birth, maybe explore what it means to be genderfluid or nonbinary?
If you feel this is strictly a discomfort with your sexuality labels and perception of them, please find some other ways to convey it that does not involve abusing gender labels.
It feels bland and basic, and I basically live to not be a basic girl. I want to be spicy and strong, not just like a girl who starts drama and complains like your average basic girl.
People have already called me basic IRL because I like Starbucks, I’m straight, and obsessed with TikTok.
Then try being legitimately interesting, rather than co-opting an identity that doesn't actually belong to you.
Also there's nothing wrong with "basic." Most of us are basic in some ways and interesting in other ways. Surely being straight and liking Starbucks and TikTok is not the sum total of who you are. Figure out the ways in which you're unique and interesting. If you don't think there are enough, then put the time into developing new hobbies. Personal growth is amazing. But don't lie about who you are. That's way worse than being basic.
I think people would be upset about dishonesty, particularly if you present yourself as a gay trans man, which most people will take to mean you don't see yourself as a woman, for example. If they learn you are actually OK with your assigned sex at birth and you were pretending to be a trans man, I could imagine they would be upset because you were dishonest.
I can see why people would think it's dishonest, but is it actually dishonest, or just unexpected?
I think even a lot of trans people don't really grasp things like gender fluid and bigender, so it's easy to do bad reasoning like "different gender in person => lied about gender" under the assumption that people only have 1 gender.
I’m comfortable being a woman with my lady parts. I also like to pretend. I told people I was male (transmasc, specifically) so that I could freely experience attraction to just men without having the “straight” label.
From this I get the impression they are being dishonest. The exploring, gender identity, etc. isn't the issue here, the issue that will upset people is the pretending when it's not disclosed that it's pretend. It's fine to explore and role play, but not in a non-consensual manner when it involves other people.
I agree completely that OP might have some complex gender stuff going on, but that's not really what makes this dishonest or problematic. Even if OP later realizes they are actually a gay trans man, the point is that they were intentionally presenting themselves as something they don't think they are now - that's where the dishonesty is.
First of all, gender expression and being trans is a vast field. While there are a bunch of labels one can use and that fit for many, this doesn't cover everybody and their experiences.
Second, there are many forms of dysphoria, not all have to do with being uncomfortable in your body.
With understanding this and only having your description from this post, there are signs of both of this (at least some I interpreted that way while reading). As far as my understanding of the demi label goes, one only feels like that gender in certain situations or at certain times. If that is "on the internet" for you, then it isn't far fetched. While you feel comfortable as a woman, you also said you'd desire male genitalia, which even without any pain from it is still dysphoria. If you want to be perceived as male sometimes or just online, that's a form of dysphoria too.
I'd recommend to you to do some soul-searching and introspection to find an answer for yourself. It doesn't sound like you're trans-masc, but maybe demiboy, genderfluid or non-binary would fit you? Nobody can answer that for you though and it is fine for you to be something that doesn't have a label.
Now I would say it's kind of inappropriate to call yourself trans-masc online if you don't consider yourself that. It might be seen as appropriating an identity or pain you don't actually have. Many trans people suffer from their dysphoria and taking that label just for the optics is maybe not that nice (similar to how people pretending to be another race isn't a good thing). Connecting this to my previous point: many trans people do start out pretending to be another gender online to experiment. If it feels comfortable to you, maybe you should think about that a bit
I can see why people would be suspicious of you because this sounds similar to what a transphobe might do to mock trans men, but as long as you're doing this in good faith and not using it to overgeneralize anything I think it's fine.
It reads like you don't want to be a woman in a "woman" way? I think I get that. I'm transfem and gender fluid and sometimes feel like a man in a non-man way. But I generally don't tell people that because it might give them the wrong impression and make them treat me in ways I don't want.
Using gender purely to change how your sexuality is perceived feels icky to me. I believe that's even a talking point transphobes use to delegitimize trans people's existence.
I think it kind of smacks as someone who wants to appropriate a struggle that is not their own.
I think most people have known a girl who claimed she was bisexual because she found some actress attractive and she wanted the attention from her friend group but found the idea of sex with women as disgusting and so never ever had a relationship with any women.
It wasn't too long ago that being gay or lesbian meant you had to hide who you were or who you loved and a lot of older people had to live through that. Some people still do to avoid losing their family. A lot of younger people don't understand that. So seeing someone who enjoys the privilege of being straight and being able to openly love who they want pretending to be marginalized just feels kind of gross. Kind of feels like Rachel Dolezal. You can look her up.
I'm probably going to be downvoted for this opinion but we were asked to explain why those around OP thought their deception was bad. This is likely why.
Hopefully you agree, but I just want to suggest we should keep an open gate, so to speak. One doesn't have to suffer or struggle to be gay/bi or trans - that's just not how that works. OP might still be some kind of trans (or not), that's not really the issue here.
OP happens to have another post talking about how they identify as bi even though they are hardly attracted to women, so your comments about faux-bi women might come across differently to her, FYI.
In the end, the community respects self-identification - and this is just how that works. It's not really appropriate to gatekeep identity on a basis like questioning how sincere someone's capacity for same-sex romance is. There are some biromantic-heterosexual women for example who might find it possible to have a romantic relationship with a woman, but generally wouldn't want to have sex with a woman. This is part of why it's pragmatic to respect self-identity, because it's complicated and we don't want a gatekeeping culture that victimizes people with less understandable sexualities or identities.
However, that's not really what's going on in this post - she said she likes to pretend to be a gay trans man to explore non-straight attraction to men, in this case she isn't actually identifying as a trans man and she is admitting to pretending. That's what makes it dishonest and thus problematic.
I understand that the climate today is vastly different than what it was when I was growing up. These days being gay or lesbian doesn't necessitate a struggle and that's fine. I am coming to terms with the fact that it's more important to be okay for people to self-identify these days, despite what I or others may think, since being queer is simply far more widely accepted (in the US). This is true for being the LGB portion of being LGBT to a large degree, but we haven't gotten there for the trans portion.
I'm just explaining the perspective people who have issues with OP might have and thus why they might have a problem which is what they asked about. Especially as someone who grew up in some of the hard days (i.e. being disowned for being gay, having to fight for my rights to marry my husband, etc.). And also experiencing people in my own journey that claimed they could speak on my behalf or for LGBTQ people as a whole despite having almost no understanding of the struggles we had to go through in the past. The struggles the gay community has faced in the past are being experienced right now though by trans folk perhaps even to a larger degree. Which is why it is more likely to be found problematic to pretend to be trans when you are not.