I usually do
1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg
3.jpg because I forgot I already have a 3.jpg
5.jpg
6.jpg
10.jpg because I forgot what number I'm up to and too lazy to check
11.jpg
12.jpg
15.jpg again, I forgot
1 0 ReplyThe most unrealistic part of this is that it's trying to save a png instead of a webp that nobody asked for
8 1 ReplyYou wanna put AI to good use? Save As suggested names.
current name: 02398750983475_98734958793_3.png suggestion: "A picture of the rabbit from Monty python holy grail saved from firefox on Feb 16th 2024.png"
|Save as suggestion | Save as 02398750983475_98734958793_3.png|
50 0 ReplySave as "I will not engage with sexually explicit content. Let's try another topic.png"
13 0 ReplyI don't think I would use a public LLM to categorize all my data. Even if I'm not doing anything uncoorh, that information's best kept under my roof
3 0 Reply
I feel like you could just call it "Monty Python Rabbit.png" and let metadata handle the rest.
30 0 ReplyWait, you want ME to name it? like type? think?
30498750987_345870938745_3.png it is :)
19 0 Reply
Firefox is already working on an accessibility feature that add descriptions to images. They could probably add this easily
3 0 ReplyHUNTB-069 - Single guy just moved in this apartment and it's only girls who want his attention - JAV, M7F.avi
Wow, thanks DeepSeek!
4 0 Reply
File already exists, overwrite?
20 0 ReplyMe: Save as "6606499f1e5c84d7c30 (2).png".
30 0 ReplyYea
5 0 Reply
Let's be honest: you're at the point you need a full-blown relational DB to catalogue your memes anyway, Stamets. (And we love you for it.)
5 0 ReplyEven Lemmy converts my good file names into nonsense when uploading.
1 0 ReplyThat’s my national insurance number 🤪
2 0 ReplyMight as well.
2 0 Reply