Bottom looks like the Fabulous Power Rangers. Power rangers have done nothing but save the planet time & time again. We should be grateful for their service
Look up "statistics drag queens crimes against minors" on Google.
Now do the same for "statistics priests crimes against minors".
Notice anything interesting?
If a certain narrative is relying only on isolated stories and journalistic reports, and the other has statistical studies to back up its claims, I'd trust the latter to have a closer grip on reality.
the bottom is just exhibitionist autogynophiles forcing us to watch them in fetish as they demean women and demand respect from society. literslly just blackface for women i hate it so much. im not claiming however we've seen large rape amounts by them so top is way fucjing worse. both fucking suck though
It's because of the top group and their antics that we're worried about the bottom group. Or any group that takes an unhealthy interest in other people's children....
No of children abused by priests are shamefully large. But no of priest are too.
So even if there are few cases of child molestation by drag cases, if you'll calculate on percentage itll look comparable.
Both the scenarios will not yield more than 1 percent ( i am taking about higher side)
That's why I don't think that this meme is doing what OP think it does
Speak for yourself. I would rather leave my 7 years old with any drag queen artist rather than a priest alone in a church. Hell it's not even close. Just thinking about that makes my skin crawl
There's no drag queen church to protect them from their crimes and shuffle them around to another diocese so that they can continue hurting children. I would say that's the most glaring difference here.
You do realize that literally any "group" you care to create will, in fact, be "involved in exploiting children" if it's large enough and your definition of "exploiting" is disingenuous enough, right?
Of course you do. But you don't care. You just want those scary men in dresses to stop making you feel weird in your pants, don't you?
It's fine. Just go with it. Be one of the girls. Your god doesn't care, because your god doesn't exist.
Both? I'm gonna say both. This argument is basically falling for the "Black and White" fallacy.
If it were worded like... "One of these groups definitely hurts children more"...you could probably get away with it though.
But the way it's worded is basically a claim into itself that the bottom group has NEVER...EVER harmed a child. Which, being an absolutist statement probably doesn't hold water.
The top group is definitely more responsible for hurt children simply by measure of influence - that's undeniable.
This TikToker actually goes through all the news stories and logs every child abuse case and whether or not it's a drag queen or trans person. She even publishes all the data so you can fact check. Currently the count of drag queens abusing kids is ZERO since she started. So... no, you're wrong.
You'd be quite internet famous if you found inaccuracy. Please go for it.
I can go on. There are plenty. I'm not going to be 'internet famous' either, for correcting some delusional internet-dweller who thinks that a specific class of people are any more righteous than any other specific class of people. That's the same as thinking cops don't lie, or cheat, or steal, because they're cops. Drag queens are just as fucked up as the rest of society. Claiming otherwise is simply naive. edit: I was being a little mean, so I removed my nasty statement
Some people in the bottom group hurt children (like in mostly every sizeable group, unfortunately), while the top group as an entity hurt children. There’s no Drag Queen organization protecting drag queens with proven child molestation records. Meanwhile, churches have done that for ages, and I don’t remember of a single priest facing consequences from the church itself for illegal behavior around children.
Honestly, You make a good point. I would say much more focusing on them being a unified entity, I'm probably focused too much on the individual. I think it's reasonable to argue as a "group" the bottom one hasn't harmed children; despite individuals from that group having done so.