AnarchyChess @sopuli.xyz PugJesus @lemmy.world 3d ago

Just to spite you, I'm going to continue making mistakes, forever

26 comments

I don't care about bishops, a triple fork is always a good move, no matter what

Edit: I meant to say quadruple fork #pawnawarenessmonth
- In that case it's quintuple fork, cause 2 pawns are threatened.
  
  Never move your horsey to the edge, that's why I didn't count the left pawn but in a very literal sense, you are right
- Except when you set yourself up for mate in 2 or so.
  
  Well I mean looking at the play, other player is in check and has to defend the king. Depending on the response, it could take out the queen. Overall, the player is already in a really shit position. Taking a chance could backfire or help come back from the brink
  
  Mate in 1 maybe but that's where I draw the line
Damn! This should he brilliant move! Usa-British gambit, your opponent loses queen you lose 2 towers!
- Holy Chess Realism!
- Taking the rook might delay mate a move or two, and blocks check with the bishop. Unless there is a mate right after that I missed.
  
  bishop can capture knight next turn which is checkmate I think
It is so Anarchy that Black just flat left their King in check.
- the knight has just moved and I don't think it was in check before?
  
  Yeah i see it now. First look was that it was proposing a move to b3 from c5, which was weird.
Black to move. Bishop takes knight. Checkmate. What am I missing here?

E: oh it was white to move. The triple fork doesn’t matter. White should move the rook across to below the bishop.
- d4
  
  Bishop takes d4?
  
  Sorry I don’t get the UI. Did white just move the knight? Or is it whites move?

26 comments