Its a lot easier looking at a beautiful person these days and not feeling a bit of jealousy knowing there is a decent chance they would vote for fascism.
Its a lot easier looking at a beautiful person these days and not feeling a bit of jealousy knowing there is a decent chance they would vote for fascism.
Beep boop. I am robot.. beep boop I have no emotion.
ITT: the 30 some odd people who that have transcended human desire.
I really can't tell. Did I flush the trump supporters out with this post? Are people so offended that a beautiful person could be a NAZI? Or am I just too blunt and to admit I don't go around imagining everyone is morally upright really makes people uncomfortable. Aka I'm an ass. Let me know cause I've said some dumb shit but this one hit a nerve.
Interesting article
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/07/opinion/andre-aciman-why-is-beauty-important.html
What is this incel shit.
I'm too chicken to talk to girls so they must be fascists.
Op, probably.
9/10 posts in this community are stoned people or edge lords. Not sure how they all seem to miss the mark of "shower thought".
You're right, I'm an incel, lol.
Um, excuse me..
Since when does beauty have anything to do with political opinion?
And since when does political opinion have anything in particular to do with showerthoughts?
Just a thought. It's true for me. Just going plain statistics. The fact that Trump is still in this race has left a disgusting taste in my mouth that concerns about 1/3 the population. It's just weird to have such a solid number of these people self identifying.
Just going plain statistics
And completely ignoring demographics.
First, a lot of people didn’t vote, period.
Second, support differs drastically by state. Let’s pretend we’re in 2020, right after the election. Are you in California? If so, a randomly chosen eligible voter has an 88% of having registered to vote. And a registered voter had an 81% chance of having voted. So 29% of people didn’t even vote. If they voted, they had a 34% chance of having voted for Trump. So that’s already reduced the overall chance that an eligible voter voted for Trump to 24%. But if they were younger than 30, that drops from 34% to 25% (overall: 18%). (Under 40? 29% (21%).) Or if they’re Black, Latino, or Asian? 21% (15%).
So if a 20-something Latino caught your eye, then there’s only a 17% chance he, she, or they voted for Trump. (And if you use different pronouns, there’s very little chance you voted for Trump.)
On the other hand, if you’re only into older white people (50+) who’ve been doing better while Trump was president, and you hold that not voting or voting third party is the same as voting for Trump (only a Sith deals in absolutes) then there’s a 61% chance he or she voted for Trump.
At least, I think that’s how those probabilities get combined.
Sources:
- https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/how-groups-voted-2020
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_United_States_presidential_election_in_California
- https://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/ror/15day-gen-2020/historical-reg-stats.pdf
- https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Applied_Mathematics/Book%3A_College_Mathematics_for_Everyday_Life_(Inigo_et_al)/03%3A_Probability/3.02%3A_Combining_Probabilities_with_And_and_Or
So which are you, ugly or republican?
What?
Lemmy is full of lunatics. You found one.
I'm not sure exactly which variety it is, but I'm diagnosing you with derangement syndrome
Thnks. Bud.
Edit: See what I mean. So sensitive.
I do believe that Republicans have a higher ratio of blondes and cat haters. Not sure if those things are attractive.
I'm not so naive to think democrats have some sort of monopoly on beauty. Unless you're talking inner beauty.
Who said anything about that?
What crap. Since when is appearance necessarily associated with intelligence?
You suck.
Lol.