Fear, loathing, and excitement as Threads adopts open standard used by Mastodon
Fear, loathing, and excitement as Threads adopts open standard used by Mastodon
Meta promised to make Threads compatible with W3C open standard for social media.
That’s the first time I’ve seen Lemmy mentioned in an article from a respectable tech outlet. Exciting! We need more like Ars.
But also, muck feta.
Ars Technica seems to really be embracing the fediverse. They have a very active official Mastodon account. https://mastodon.social/@arstechnica
Yeah, Threads can do all it wants. I've set a preemptive block. I want nothing to do with Threads. Of course, I cannot control what other instances decide to federate and get my content that way. But I won't make it easy for them.
What steps did you take to preemptively block it? I want nothing to do with Threads either but am a bit confused on what I should be doing. Is there a list of instances who defederated from threads or something?
I appreciate that the article mentioned that Threads isn't federated and these claims often never materialize, because I feel like this is the most important fact, and it's barely discussed.
Threads is not federated. There's nothing to defederate from, and it's unclear if there ever will be.
All the benefits of embracing activitypub are provided by announcing adoption, and all the downsides only materialize by actually doing the hard part. Based on experience and logic I think federation will happen far, far in the future if ever.
All the benefits of embracing activitypub are provided by announcing adoption, and all the downsides only materialize by actually doing the hard part.
Well said. It wouldn't take much to convince me that this was their strategy all along.
Yeah, that's exactly what I think is the strategy.
If I were the VP or whatever in charge of this -- which means that I'm assuming I'm a dishonest corporate shill -- I'd create a roadmap to integrating activitypub that includes the very most basic functionality as the first deliverable, then any usability or UX features as round two deliverables. Then I'd tell the project manager to plan for an open-ended "assessment" period between completing round one and starting round two, and tell them to move on to other tasks until further notice,
IF they ever finish, you just announce that it's technically possible for someone on Mastadon to query the Threads server and vice-versa, but, like there's no way to actually find people on Mastadon servers in Threads or follow them, and vice-versa, and then leave it that way. And that assumes the project doesn't just get suspended at some point and left that way.
I’m incredibly surprised that Wired (the original source) didn’t mention that there’s precedent for the fediverse’s concerns in Gchat/XAMPP
Because there aren't. That was a dumb blog post.
If Google Talk never supported XMPP it still would have had millions of users and XMPP would have died years earlier. That wasn't EEE, that was Google keeping an open protocol alive for a while until they decided not to.