Trump trial: Prosecutors withhold witness lineup from former president’s team
Trump trial: Prosecutors withhold witness lineup from former president’s team
Prosecutors made the unusual decision this week to remain almost entirely mum about the order in which they planned to call their first witnesses in former President Donald Trump’s hush
Prosecutors made the unusual decision this week to remain almost entirely mum about the order in which they planned to call their first witnesses in former President Donald Trump’s hush money trial in New York.
Joshua Steinglass, a prosecutor working on behalf of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, said Friday evening he would let Trump’s attorneys know the name of their first witness on Sunday night, the day before opening arguments in the case are set to begin, according to a report from the courtroom. Trump's defense team had asked for the names of the first three witnesses that prosecutors would call.
…
“Mr. Trump has been tweeting about the witnesses," Steinglass told Judge Juan Merchan. "We’re not telling them who the witnesses are.”
Blanche then asked Merchan if he could have the information if he promised Trump would not post on social media about the witnesses, to which Merchan replied that he did not believe Blanche could make such a vow.
You're viewing a single thread.
Blanche then asked Merchan if he could have the information if he promised Trump would not post on social media about the witnesses, to which Merchan replied that he did not believe Blanche could make such a vow.
Agree to the terms, and then when Trump inevitably intimidates the first witness, throw his ass in jail until the trail is over. I don't understand why they have to continue to give him special treatment for every single step of the trial. Either the trial process was never meant to handle all possible types of defendants, or it's being applied differently to this case. If it's the former, overhaul the judicial system to make it fit all types of cases, if it's the latter, throw the case to another court where it will be applied equally.
I get the feeling they're trying to avoid martyrdom. He needs to go to prison for the big things, not on technicalities.
I don't know, witness intimidation is pretty damn big. And a pretty damn big admission of guilt.
The thing is, he wouldn't do it openly. He'd pass the names to an assistant who would make some anonymous posts online and let it go from there. Sure, maybe that can be proven in another trial, but that's too far away to help the witnesses or to avoid slowing this case
You're talking about the guy who just says whatever the hell is on his mind at the time.
He is too stupid to keep his mouth shut. The problem is the courts are too cowardly to enforce their own gag orders.
"Please stop tweeting about the clerks and family members of the court." [He immediately tweets about the clerks and family members.] "Oh, ok, please have a 10 day extension and we'll give you a far lesser bond."
Once you put it like that, it's just laughable how much they've pampered this asshole. And he still. Fucking. Complains.
The entire right wing and Christian movements in the US seems to be based on nothing on persecution syndrome. It's just moaning about how oppressed they are day in an day out.
he wouldn't do it openly
...where have you been for the past 7 years plus change?
He does MOST of his crimes openly and the rest he publicly brags about later!
There's literally NO way he'd ever try to make his witness tampering discreet. That would be like expecting Guy Fieri to cook without ketchup 😛
People only need to go to jail or prison for crimes. Witness intimidation is a crime.
The thing is where will you house the orange asshole's Secret Service detail in a prison?
That's gotta be a huge drawback for any judge to send him to prison during a trial.
Insurrectionists don't deserve secret service protection.
If a U.S. President Goes to Prison, Does the Secret Service Go, Too?
Under current United States federal law, all former presidents are entitled to lifetime protection from the Secret Service. Barring an act of Congress or a presidential executive order, the Secret Service is bound by law to protect former presidents for life. There aren't any exceptions listed in the statute governing the protection of former presidents.
Trump's various indictments have left many wondering if the Secret Service would accompany Trump (or any other convicted former president) to prison.
"Yes, no question," said Ronald Kessler, author of two books about the Secret Service: "In the President's Secret Service" and "The First Family Detail." "There wouldn't be a Secret Service agent inside his cell, but I expect that there would be two agents outside of his cell, two agents in the corridor leading up to the cell block and another two agents at the entrance to the prison."
Other commentators, including a former Secret Service agent, have said that as few as two Secret Service agents could be posted at the prison, but Kessler called that "crazy."
*** There are multiple links in the article that I haven't transferred here.
Personally I think that any former president who winds up incarcerated should have to serve their time in the military side of Leavenworth, but that’s just me. The Secret Service would have a much easier time integrating into a system run by MPs than civilian prison guards.
There's got to be a spare supply closet somewhere: use that. and make sure they don't use Epstein-brand video cameras.
"Don't deserve" is a completely different thing that "Won't get" which seems important to point out because your response is about the latter.
I copied portions of an article. I wasn't personally choosing deserve or get.
Then why did you choose those specific quotes as a response to my statement about not deserving?
Because the federal rules were in it. Deserving or undeserving has little to do with it then.
Is that something for a judge to take into consideration though, or for a warden?
They sit outside the cell, obviously.
Why would he need a secret service detail? He has prison guards.
So did Epstein and they didn't save him.
I think many consider witness intimidation to be a big thing. Threatening judges/advocates/... is big, doxing their families as a form of intimidation goes beyond even that. They should have never let them (not just Trump, but also others who were making threats or encouraging others to make threats) get away with it.
That it gets a pass as "not bad enough" is indicative of how far the USA civil society has fallen.
He needs to not be treated like a fucking king because he isn't one. Presidents are just people who happen to be elected, and shouldn't get treated like royalty.
Worrying about making him a martyr is counterproductive.
Presidents are just people who happen to be elected
Some of them not even that, such as himself and first term Dubya.
He is already claiming to be a martyr since being charged for all the civil and criminal indictments
why they have to continue to give him special treatment for every single step
Because the US "justice" system is very conservative and Frank Wilhoit was absolutely right in this characterization:
Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition ... There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect
Trump is in the in-group no matter what and anyone who displeases the fascist man-child and his cult in any way is in the out-group. No matter what.
There's this but also they have to give him every possible consideration because any possibility where they end up having any kind of misstep gives him the opportunity for either a mistrial or to have the whole damn thing thrown out on appeal so they have to make sure they get their ducks in a row perfectly before doing absolutely anything. Otherwise you're going to have that little dehydrated mango get off and be out and running around on atechnicalityy.
they have to give him every possible consideration
No they don't. They pretend that they do but they actually don't.
any possibility where they end up having any kind of misstep gives him the opportunity for either a mistrial or to have the whole damn thing thrown out
You don't get a mistrial for your actions having the consequences prescribed by the law.
I know it feels like that because everyone has adopted the media's deference to lunatics and crooks, but you cannot get a mistrial without an extremely serious breech of rules.
It's an excuse for treating him with kid gloves, not a valid reason for doing so.
they have to make sure they get their ducks in a row perfectly before doing absolutely anything
They really don't, no. This isn't Congress where you just make up the rules yourself as you go along. This is a court of law where what you can and cannot do is clearly defined. That can not only bind you from misconduct but also protect you from negative consequences of following the rules.
Otherwise you're going to have that little dehydrated mango get off and be out and running around on atechnicalityy.
That's not how "getting off on a technicality" works. For that to happy, someone has to make a mistake that is against the rule. Holding him accountable for his words and actions according to the letter of the law can't set him free.
I'm frankly sick and tired of everyone using that completely invalid excuse every time he shits on the whole concept of law and a just society without incurring any consequences.
ENOUGH!
You don't get a mistrial for your actions having the consequences prescribed by the law.
Unless you have a really good lawyer. But none of them will work for him at this point.
It sucks, but I don't believe anything will happen to him. The secret service will never let him go to jail with the commoners. The best we can hope for is house arrest, frozen assets, and limited WiFi. He will stil run for office and his people will vote for him. It would make a funny tv show to have a president who couldn't leave his home and had every visitor and phone call vetted and monitored.
The secret service will never let him go to jail with the commoners.
There's a motion being proposed to remove secret service for any individual who gets themselves convicted of a felony.
Of course the Republicans will ensure that it will fail to be passed, but it's still an interesting thing to think about.
Well, at least then maybe his communications detail could keep him and his cronies on encrypted systems. I know someone who worked on his detail, and they were always chasing Trump’s people down to stop them from using unapproved unsecured channels.
Funny on TV, not in real life 😭
The secret service will never let him go to jail with the commoners.
He can go to a military prison where it wont be an issue. Throw him in solitary or under armed guard and he can waste away his life reading cat and the hat and other reading level appropriate books.
The won't give him the contempt of court charges he deserves. Acknowledging that at least allows them to make better decisions even if they aren't doing the right thing.
Fuck this two tiered justice bullshit.
The rich and powerful never get treated with the same distain and lack of dignity that the non-wealthy in this country are treated with in our fucked up judicial system. And Trump has proven it over and over again as he never sees any real consequences for what he's done.