You're viewing a single thread.
Remember kids, God is all-powerful, all-knowing, and created EVERYTHING; including evil and suffering.
This means that God created evil, knowing full well what that meant for us humans. He knew Adam was going to eat the apple, and lie to him about it, but still got angry that he was lied to; so angry that he damned the rest of humanity as punishment.
So if God created evil, and knew what that would do for all of humanity, and it was a part of his great plan to do so, then God must also be evil.
You can’t have it both ways. He can’t be good and not evil if he created evil. He also lets it happen. He can’t be good and not evil if he knows every mistake we will make, and knowing the impact of our mistakes (i.e., the other people it affects). This makes God culpable for our sins, yet he is not held accountable for his inaction.
In my opinion the only god worth thinking about is one that is beyond human comprehension. Once you restrict a god to only only following human logic god ceases to be interesting.
Honestly, anyone who says god is all powerful and all knowing clearly hasn't read the Bible. There is a clear character arc there, and that's absolutely incompatible with those two assumptions.
I man, look at the whole Jesus thing! He makes himself human to see why the humans can't be good, he does retain at least some of his godly powers in human form tho. Even as God made human he has outbursts of rage and is at least at one time incredibly inconsiderate to his parents. Clear character faults if you ask me. At the end he is like "shit was hard man, goddamn!" and changes toe policy for going to heaven completely.
Don’t forget how he raped a child to impregnate her, thus also committing adultery and breaking one of his own commandments at the same time, just so he could send his “only begotten son” to die, just to effectively give up and never return.
Not enough info to meaningfully talk about rape imho, and the 'son' thing is a bit complicated. Probably more correctly described as a kind of aspect?
So like conservatives in ‘Merica he just makes a woman have a child by sheer force of will. No rape involved!
Rape means no consent, has nothing to do with the unconventional way of conception. The entire passage is so imprecisely written, that I don't think you can for sure say it would have been rape.
Well power impacts consent.. can you really fully consent to an all powerful being when there's a chance they might destroy your life for refusing?
First of all, not all powerful. That is what my first comment was all about. Second, I wouldn't categorically say no, unlikely, but not impossible. Thirdly, why do so many people feel like debating the finer points of a fictional event with me? You guys are almost as bad as harry potter nerds, except you hate the book you are talking about.
uh wow, I thought we were just chatting, not debating. Why are you acting like this? I also never specified my beliefs so it's weird to jump to all these conclusions.
A very human-centric perspective.
There's the option that God is all-powerful, all-knowing, etc, but humans are completely irrelevant to his plan.Unsurprisingly no human religion advocates for this perspective.
The history of Christian theology can be summed up as: a handful of guys said "hold on, the premises of this whole idea contradict each other", followed by millenia of coping old dudes writing texts and texts and more texts rationalizing why the dogma they were indoctrinated to believe in has no paradoxes, ackshually.
Think of it quantum mechanically, God is aware of all possible outcomes, of which Adam lying to Him was but one of the many possible consequences of free will (note that the forbidden fruit gave them knowledge of their nakedness, they already had free will). Free will is inherently incompatible with determinism unless we account for all possibilities resulting of free will. Quantum mechanics and superposition theory is the closest we can get to understanding the machinations of God. Even then it still doesn’t help in the least.
This isn’t the gotcha you think it is, because the Bible literally says as much in Isaiah 45:7:
I form the light and create darkness,
I make peace and create calamity;
I, the LORD, do all these things.However, it’s not valid to conclude from the fact that God created evil that He must therefore be evil, because He created good as well. At best you could say He is neutral.
In fact, it is you who is evil because you ignore all the good that He does and focus only on the evil.
…it’s not valid to conclude from the fact that God created evil that He must therefore be evil, because He created good as well. At best you could say He is neutral.
I hate splitting hairs, but in this case I do feel it’s an important distinction to point out that I said he must “also be evil”; in the sense of being in addition to good, he is also evil. So he is both things, and not just one or the other.
In my personal experiences with Cristians, I have often heard how “God is good” because of all the good things (more often in reference to things other people have done to solve a problem; e.g., doctors, nurses, and firefighters), and that anything considered bad or evil is the work of Satan. At the same time, Christians that I have known are all too happy to acknowledge that God created everything, yet thy conveniently fail to acknowledge that evil is one of those things having been created too.
And for what it’s worth: while my focus here in this conversation has been on the negatives I see in life, that does not mean I do not acknowledge and rejoice in the positives when they present themselves. Mind you, I do suffer from depression and suicidal ideation, so I will acknowledge that it can be difficult from time to time to remember the positives when I feel like I’m drowning in the negatives.
Do with that as you will. I do thank you for the opportunity for discussion. 😊
Thanks for your response, and please accept my apology for misinterpreting what you said. I think my mistake came from the fact that “also” in this context could mean both “consequently” and “as well”.
I do agree that a lot of Christians seem to be struggling with this idea, but let’s be honest, it IS a tough pill to swallow. While I think there is value in overemphasizing the goodness of God in order not to get depressed by the sometimes overwhelming amount of evil that may present itself, it’s a mistake to lose sight of it, because that’s how it continues to fester and grow.
I think the parable of the wheat and the tares (Matthew 13:24-30) is a helpful metaphor in this regard: to an extent, we have to accept the presence of evil even while focusing on growing the good, but that’s okay as long as we don’t let it get out of hand and we have a plan for dealing with it eventually.
My parents, bless their hearts, were unfortunately not very good at this. My dad in particular focused so much on getting rid of all of my evils that he destroyed pretty much all hope of ever being good enough in eyes, which of course did not exactly motivate me to try to do better. But as much as I’d like to be angry about that, I know it’s of no use because I’ll be the one paying the price for it by becoming bitter and resentful, so all I can do is take it as a lesson learned in what not to do, and try to figure out a way to do better.
I hope that was helpful and I wish you all the best. Depression is an awful condition and it takes a lot of courage and willpower not to give in to that. Keep fighting the good fight!
And solutions :)
In the first one, God is not omni-benevolent.
In the second, claiming "God did create a universe without evil" immediately followed by "evil exists because" is contradictory.
If God created everything, then God created evil.
Both of those solutions would mean that God is not all powerful.
Straight to hell
